SwampG8r
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 04:58 PM
Original message |
Poll question: vote on daily post limit |
|
the posts flip by so fast they lose all information and entertainment value so i(meaning you the reader of this post) believe that
|
SwampG8r
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 05:00 PM
Response to Original message |
1. leave a message folks im trying to get a solid response |
msongs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 05:02 PM
Response to Original message |
2. supression is not good when repubs try to do, why should it be good for DU / nt |
SwampG8r
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. its getting hard to keep up and good threads get lost |
|
a lot of useful information is being drowned out
|
dkf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
10. Isn't that what the greatest pages are for? |
Bernardo de La Paz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 05:03 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Wrong forum. Please move this thread. |
Joe the Revelator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 05:03 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Wtf? Why should we institute a post limit?? |
npincus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
dkf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 05:04 PM
Response to Original message |
7. This is information gathering season. |
|
Anyone who can contribute should do so.
|
Va Lefty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 05:04 PM
Response to Original message |
8. I think we have enough rules here |
grantcart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 05:04 PM
Response to Original message |
9. I propose that we get one post per major McCain gaffe per day |
|
that would come in between 6-9 a day.
|
dailykoff
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 05:05 PM
Response to Original message |
11. How about five more threads |
A-Schwarzenegger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 05:05 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Your sons and your daughters are beyond your command |
|
your old post guidelines are rapidly fading
|
azmouse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 05:05 PM
Response to Original message |
13. A limit worked well before. |
SwampG8r
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 05:05 PM
Response to Original message |
14. i saw a post wondering if it was a better policy and i wanted to find out what |
|
yall thought about it i myself actually voted no i have seen several threads asking about the old 3 a day policy and wanted to see what the real overall opinion was
|
yourguide
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 05:06 PM
Response to Original message |
15. would help weed out some of these stupid trolls. |
Muttocracy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 05:08 PM
Response to Original message |
16. I'm not sure - I'd prefer merging threads, though that's extra work for the moderators |
Muttocracy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 05:09 PM
Response to Original message |
17. another thought for your personal viewing sanity - sort threads by start time |
|
instead of last reply. Then "sinking" is not an issue and each thread gets equal amounts of your attention. If there's an interesting one, you can bookmark it or reply to it and easily find it later.
|
Boojatta
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 05:23 PM
Response to Original message |
18. Did you mean a limit on new THREADS per day? |
Liberal_in_LA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 05:27 PM
Response to Original message |
19. posts or initiations of new threads? |
Boojatta
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 05:27 PM
Response to Original message |
20. Do you mean a limit on new threads per day in General Discussion? |
|
Some Topic Forums that aren't moving too fast, unless you're a very, very, very slow reader.
|
justiceischeap
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 05:31 PM
Response to Original message |
21. I think if people spent a bit more time posting to appropriate threads instead of starting new ones |
|
We wouldn't have this problem. There must have been 50 different threads (at least) speculating about the "baby," then another 50+ about the daughter being pregnant, then 50+ of people bitching about the other 100.
I don't know if it's possible on DU but I also think if there are a lot of threads on the same topic, then the threads should be combined or maybe during the election season a forum specifically for scandal should be started. Those types of posts are what seem to knock the other stuff off so fast.
Lastly, you can always hide threads that you don't want to follow...
|
salonghorn70
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 05:32 PM
Response to Original message |
22. I Understand Your Point, But..... |
|
I don't like the idea of limits. Sometimes I'm following a post and in 5 mins its on page 2. Well, I just go to page 2.
|
ChazII
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 05:35 PM
Response to Original message |
|
on posts. Many points of view are represented here.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:09 AM
Response to Original message |