Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TPM: Face It: They Didn't Vet Her

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 06:53 PM
Original message
TPM: Face It: They Didn't Vet Her
By Josh Marshall

Earlier I noted Andrea Mitchell's reference to reports that the McCain camp had just sent a team of GOP lawyers up to Alaska to do what I guess you'd call a post-vetting of Sarah Palin. Now George Stephanopoulos appears to have more. George says the McCainers are sending a "rapid response team of about ten operatives that includes lawyers" to do the aforementioned deeper vet. A lot of attention is being given to Gov. Palin's daughter's situation. The much bigger deal is the expanding trooper-gate investigation, the fact that Palin lied in her Friday speech about her purported opposition to the Bridge to Nowhere, her apparent former membership in the secessionist Alaska Independence Party, and more. Individually, you can come to your own judgment about how consequential these stories are. What they show pretty clearly now -- in addition to the news that the McCain campaign is only now sending in a vetting team -- is that John McCain didn't do any serious vetting of Palin before he invited her to join his ticket and, he hopes, become Vice President of the United States.

Fundamentally, of course, this is about John McCain. And the real issue here is what this slapdash decision says about his judgment.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/212192.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. How long ago was Palin campaigning to succeed from the US?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. SECEDE, not SUCCEED
Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. It looks like she was a member until she became mayor
of Wasilla, when she switched to the Republican party for political expediency. So that was 1996.

In related news, that means she's a person who will change political parties in her quest for personal power. Just as valid a concern as her secessionist tendencies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. DUers have been saying this for days
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. It was obvious. The question is if the MSM will take it up.
I'd like every Republican operative to have to answer this question regarding the quality of McCain's vetting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Epiphany4z Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ya canj't help but wonder
why no vetting?...the good news is maybe Obama scared the caca out of McCain and made a hail mary vp pic..it would explain why no leaks ..she was not a top choice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
live love laugh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. eGGszactly. WHY not? The only logical answer to me is to upstage Obama. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NotThisTime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. You are exactly right.... He made this choice Thursday night I'd bet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lurky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. To me it reeks of a last-minute pick.
Like everyone else said no, and they were running out of time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. This is amazing. How dumb can they be?
Apparently Tim Pawlenty is also extremely pissed he was passed over for a flawed VP candidate. Looks like the wheels are coming off the McCain wagon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
10. They had their buds the dominionists vet her, and all the dominionists need to know was
are you a fundy? These are not complex people, they only see black and white, and she was determined to be... white. Stamp her Approved!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
11. He had the longest time in US history to chose his VP - this is what he chose
He had the longest time of any US candidate for president, to chose his VP and
then made a quick, rash, uneducated guess without proper investigation and vetting
and picked a manager of a pizza hut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC