Palin isn't just some redneck woman with a gun, a Bible and a passel of kids. As detailed in articles in NYT and Time Magazine, she's a highly ambitious, cutthroat politician who turned on those who first got her into politics when it suited her agenda. She has an innate ability to understand when and where the voter tide is turning before others realize it, labeled "Sarah-dipity" by a journalist who now works on her campaign.
More than that, her suspected links to Dominionists, as revealed by dailykos and other bloggers over the weekend, have culminated in digby's revelation that she was vetted by the Council for National Policy, a highly secretive organization founded by Tim LaHaye and currently led by James Dobson. These Christian extremists are tied to a network of GOTV activism and possible voting fraud. For example, the GOTV go-to man in Ohio is Rod Parsley, who worked closely with Ken Blackwell in 2004.
Digby reports that McCain was informed that an explosive fight would break out among convention delegates if he chose either of his top two picks, Joe Lieberman and Tom Ridge, and that both men would be rejected for their pro-choice policies.
Unwilling to go with Pawlenty or Romney because of their conventionality, McCain accepted Palin. And now, whether he realizes it or not, McCain is nothing more to the evangelicals but the old Trojan horse who will smuggle their candidate into the White House to establish a Christian theocracy in this nation.
They don't care if McCain lasts four years. They want Sarah. The only question in my mind is, will they wait for him to go to Jesus, or will they arrange the meeting?
This is the story as I understand it now. Maybe it will not pan out. But it fits in with what I understand of rightwing Christian extremists. I had really thought Gingrich would try to run this year, and was surprised and pleased when he didn't. (Believe me, Newt is totally part of this effort.) Now I see a more indirect but multi-faceted strategy emerging, and it chills me.
Edit to add links:
NYT article by Elisabeth Bumiller published 9-1-08 - reviews vetting process and McCain's decision to go with Palin but without mentioning the CNP
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/02/us/politics/02vetting.html?_r=1&oref=sloginDigby's blog about the CNP's involvement in Palin's vetting:
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2008/09/yes-sarah-palin-was-vetted-by-dday-it.htmlTime article by Nathan Thornburgh published 9-2-08 - describes Palin's early political career:
http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1837918,00.htmlDaily Kos entry by dogemperor detailing Palin's links to Dominionists:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/8/29/163234/559/495/579213Harper's Magazine online - quotes from Palin's pastors, mentions Gingrich:
http://harpers.org/archive/2008/08/hbc-90003486Daily Kos entry by Public Servant - Some good background on Rod Parsley:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/3/15/1845/54948/459/477541Extra-credit reading: Harper's Magazine - reprint of excellent 2006 article by Jeff Sharlet that details the revisionist efforts of the Christian right:
http://harpers.org/archive/2006/12/0081322