Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I hate to say it...but I was sort of worried about the Palin choice last Friday.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 06:54 PM
Original message
I hate to say it...but I was sort of worried about the Palin choice last Friday.
Just the sheer WTF of it. The total surprise.

Boy, was I stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. The total Maverick-ness of it, you mean?
Well, it WAS a game-changer--no doubt about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. It had potential...but the kookyness soon emerged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChimpersMcSmirkers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. The timing and sheer chutzpah of it were impressive...What a difference 72 hrs makes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classof56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah, I was worried too. And got quite depressed.
The more I heard, the better I felt and hope has replaced depression. (I was on pretty much of a "high" following the DNC. Sorry if I sound manic-depressive--never been diagnosed as such!) But the point is, you were not stupid as I am not. We just got caught up in the moment and all the "ain't this grand" rhetoric that followed McSame's announcement.

I am SO thankful for DU and the path of reality it keeps me on.

Blessings!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Yeah so was I and I was also very depressed
actually for a couple of days because I thought some people might actually be stupid enough to fall for this stunt. I now see that only the very very dumbest (like the wingnuts who we never had in the first place) are the only ones sucking this ridiculous pick in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NotThisTime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. I was giddy watching it from my Husbands hospital bed - it really cheered me up....
I saw this coming the minute I saw the announcement, I never imagined it would get THIS deep THIS fast however :) I hope Palin sticks around!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. I hope your husband is okay now
:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm still a little worried.
I'm guessing they'll have to keep her, and she's good at rattling off talking points. She could be a problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Me too
I never underestimate the ability of the american people to rally around someone, no matter how wrong they are for the job. I see that happening here.

"She's choosing to have her baby and keep it and marry the father!":loveya: :loveya: :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yep. Attractive young family, nice girl in trouble
they're gonna run with this if they can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. when it was announced i ma asking, who is she. within half hour enough dirt i was lmao
and saying wtf. now it is just gggggeeeeeeezus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
verges Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
11. Me too.
On paper, at first glance, she looked like a RW Fundie dream! But as more comes out, I'm not so worried. I do think it was nice of Sen McCain(R-Ariz) to hand Soon to be President Obama the Presidency like this.

At least Guiliani no longer has the biggest blunder/miscalculation of the whole campaign season '08.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
D23MIURG23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
12. I looked for the best arguments I could find that she could actually be dangerous.
Edited on Mon Sep-01-08 07:52 PM by D23MIURG23
I found one that wasn't superficially laughable, posted it here, and people debunked it pretty well.

So now I'm pretty much void of fear. All the evangelicals in the country showing up at the polls won't make up for the people alienated by the sheer stupidity and bad judgement evidenced by this situation. Thats not even accounting for for the problems of the woman herself.

McCain sure upstaged Obama's convention alright. Mission Accomplished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Many Evangelicals don't think a woman should have any power
at all, this may keep them away in droves...:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
many a good man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
13. It knocked Obama's 40 million strong Acceptance speech out of the headlines
and shored up the right wing fundy base. The question now is will the press do it job in vetting her as McCain certainly has not. Recent history leaves me little room for optimism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. But look at the cost to them...
His campaign is imploding. Duck and cover!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
14. The first thing that I thought of immediately upon on hearing this was...
"Holy Shit! McCain just lost any chance he had!"...and then I literally laughed out loud.

I Googled her, and was assured that this was probably the worst possible candidate for VP, (others include, Charlie Manson, Cheney or bush), and McCain just tied the anchor of the Titanic around his neck.

After talking to a few R's I know, I realized that McCain really did make the worst mistake possible. Some were willing to hold their noses and vote GOP, before this "event", but immediately following the announcement, virtually all of them said they would sit this one out. the GOP rationale around here, McCain will ot survive one full term in office, and there is NO WAY, Palin is qualified to take the helm of the presidency.

Just about the only ones who think this is a good idea are those GOP'ers on media feeds, and when you watch/listen to them, you realize there is NO true emotion other than, "damn, but I've got to make it look like this was brilliant".

I figure that all of those McCain called or hoped for, just told him to go away, they know McCain is going to lose, and they don't want to be a part of the burnout. Palin said OK, because she figures it was her "destiny"...instead, it will be her Waterloo, (nasty destiny if you ask me).

We've got work to do, that's a given and we all better work hard to bring down these clods, but one thing's for sure...McCain had a lot of qualified women in the GOP to choose from, he made just about the worst possible choice...:D

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. I think out of all this, we have an opportunity here.
If we win the White House, if we increase our majorities in Congress, if Proposition 2 is defeated in California, then it will be a huge setback to the religious right. If Obama can appeal to the people of faith who are NOT supporters of Sarah Palin and that part of the political base, then this can be a tremendous win. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnycap Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Let's not be too confident about Governor Palin...
I'm not sure we should be so confident at this point. Think about this. Senator Obama himself admitted that he cannot win without Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania is the state that he said the quote about "clinging to guns and religion...etc. etc." Pennsylvania voted solidly for Hillary Clinton despite Obama's campaign spending three times as much. Along comes John McCain who names Sarah Palin. Palin is a woman as are 54% of Pennsylvania voters. Governor Palin certainly clings to her guns and religion. It's not a big leap for all those Pennsylvanians with "antipathy for those who are not like them." to identify with Governor Palin...that could end up being game, set and match in the world of electoral college combinations. If I were Senator Obama tonight, I think I would be more than a little concerned. The way the media is tearing apart the Palin family, it appears average Americans could become pretty outraged pretty quick...it's like what they did to Hillary all over again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odogg Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Please.
PA is off the table for McLame, especially with the Rendell/Nutter machine and Biden from Scranton. Bristol will be off the pages soon especially with troopergate just starting to ramp up. McCain is f%*ked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. Welcome to DU!!
:hi:

ENjoy your stay!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 04:45 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. Not so...the good people of PA are practical if nothing else...
they will see this for what it is, a baltant move to try to pander to them and draw them in under false pretenses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheWhoMustBeObeyed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 05:59 AM
Response to Original message
23. I am much more worried now than I was then.
Edited on Tue Sep-02-08 06:31 AM by SheWhoMustBeObeyed
Palin isn't just some redneck woman with a gun, a Bible and a passel of kids. As detailed in articles in NYT and Time Magazine, she's a highly ambitious, cutthroat politician who turned on those who first got her into politics when it suited her agenda. She has an innate ability to understand when and where the voter tide is turning before others realize it, labeled "Sarah-dipity" by a journalist who now works on her campaign.

More than that, her suspected links to Dominionists, as revealed by dailykos and other bloggers over the weekend, have culminated in digby's revelation that she was vetted by the Council for National Policy, a highly secretive organization founded by Tim LaHaye and currently led by James Dobson. These Christian extremists are tied to a network of GOTV activism and possible voting fraud. For example, the GOTV go-to man in Ohio is Rod Parsley, who worked closely with Ken Blackwell in 2004.

Digby reports that McCain was informed that an explosive fight would break out among convention delegates if he chose either of his top two picks, Joe Lieberman and Tom Ridge, and that both men would be rejected for their pro-choice policies.

Unwilling to go with Pawlenty or Romney because of their conventionality, McCain accepted Palin. And now, whether he realizes it or not, McCain is nothing more to the evangelicals but the old Trojan horse who will smuggle their candidate into the White House to establish a Christian theocracy in this nation.

They don't care if McCain lasts four years. They want Sarah. The only question in my mind is, will they wait for him to go to Jesus, or will they arrange the meeting?

This is the story as I understand it now. Maybe it will not pan out. But it fits in with what I understand of rightwing Christian extremists. I had really thought Gingrich would try to run this year, and was surprised and pleased when he didn't. (Believe me, Newt is totally part of this effort.) Now I see a more indirect but multi-faceted strategy emerging, and it chills me.

Edit to add links:

NYT article by Elisabeth Bumiller published 9-1-08 - reviews vetting process and McCain's decision to go with Palin but without mentioning the CNP
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/02/us/politics/02vetting.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

Digby's blog about the CNP's involvement in Palin's vetting:
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2008/09/yes-sarah-palin-was-vetted-by-dday-it.html

Time article by Nathan Thornburgh published 9-2-08 - describes Palin's early political career:
http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1837918,00.html

Daily Kos entry by dogemperor detailing Palin's links to Dominionists:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/8/29/163234/559/495/579213

Harper's Magazine online - quotes from Palin's pastors, mentions Gingrich:
http://harpers.org/archive/2008/08/hbc-90003486

Daily Kos entry by Public Servant - Some good background on Rod Parsley:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/3/15/1845/54948/459/477541

Extra-credit reading: Harper's Magazine - reprint of excellent 2006 article by Jeff Sharlet that details the revisionist efforts of the Christian right:
http://harpers.org/archive/2006/12/0081322
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 06:13 AM
Response to Original message
24. I was initially surprised
but the more I read about her the better I felt about our prospects in November. My only real concern right now is that McSame will dump her or she will quit leaving McSame to choose a more fearsome candidate. However, given the enthusiasm generated among the fundies, I have my doubts that they will dump her because if he does the fundies, whose support of McSame has been pretty shaky to this point, will likely be apoplectic and if they do end up dumping her (or getting her to bow out) they would need to do so ASAP because the election is not very far away and they would, of course, need plenty of time to vet and prop up a new candidate (not to mention repair the political fallout from his selection and subsequent change of course). Either way it goes the road ahead looks really rough for McSame and he could not have done more to help ruin his chances against Obama. In fact, my mother and mother-in-law, normally reliable Republicans are either leaning towards Obama or are going to definitely vote for him. As such, McSame's selection of Palin is clearly having an effect on the race, albeit a bad one for him so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meshuga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 06:23 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. If he dumps her it will be the end of McCain
because it reveals his incompetence. So he is in DEEP trouble even if he brings a more "fearsome" person to the ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC