willing dwarf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-02-08 07:42 AM
Original message |
You can awfully spattered dragging someone through the mud |
|
Which is why Obama's comment makes sense: "people’s families are off limits, and people’s children are especially off limits. This shouldn't be part of our politics."
Rove has taught the republican insiders how to run circles around things like this. They will work to tear us to shreds if we push the Palin story. They're already working hard to do so.
Fascinated as I am by the story, I mean to make this my last word on Palin's family until the debates, unless of course she throws in the towel before then -- but I'll bet she won't do that. Sounds like she's got ambition, and running with someone as old as McCain, she probably figures she'll be president herself soon. We need to react against her policies, not against her family.
Ok, spoke my peace, now it's time to get back to work.
|
Canuckistanian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-02-08 07:43 AM
Response to Original message |
1. As someone wisely said, "The pig likes it" n/t |
Unsane
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-02-08 07:44 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Odd you mention Rove, whose MO was to have Bush 'take the high road,' while the 527s/blogs |
|
tore John Kerry to shreds. Sounds a lot like Obama is doing the same thing.
|
pampango
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-02-08 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
10. Ouch. Obama as a Rove convert. Now that's enough to shake my world up. |
grannie4peace
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-02-08 07:44 AM
Response to Original message |
|
"vengeance is mine", that is what GOD said. rove will destroy himself--- no evil can last ---because GOD is THE BOSS!!!!!
|
POAS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-02-08 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
11. Leave Rove's family alone! |
|
Oh wait you didn't mention Rove's family, nevermind!
|
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-02-08 07:45 AM
Response to Original message |
4. He isn't dragging anyone through the mud. Neither is his campaign. |
|
(That's our job..THAT'S how Rove's boys have done it all this time)
|
Az
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-02-08 07:46 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Frankly we don't have to bring the kid up any more |
|
The secret is out there. The damage has been done. Now all we have to do is talk about how abstinence only sex ed fails. And the jerks have no where to run to.
|
rsmith6621
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-02-08 07:47 AM
Response to Original message |
6. She Will Be President 4 Sure |
marylanddem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-02-08 07:47 AM
Response to Original message |
7. She opposes sex education. Does she want all our kids to |
|
become pregnant at 16? She's an a**hole who would deny women choice. Everything about her and the way she lives her life is fair game.
|
patrice
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-02-08 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
12. We CAN talk about her policy on these issues without brutalizing her family. |
POAS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-02-08 07:48 AM
Response to Original message |
8. Your right, Palin should have left her family out of this! |
|
After all she is the one that said yes to John McCain while knowing her 17 year old was pregnant and that rumors were already going around Alaska about her pregnancy.
She's the one promoting abstinence while trotting her pregnant unwed daughter onto the national stage, literally.
Yep she should have left her family out of the spotlight of modern Presidential politics or at least been open and honest from the beginning.
|
patrice
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-02-08 07:48 AM
Response to Original message |
9. I make those threads 0. I don't hide them and I don't put the DUer on ignore, because I like |
|
knowing what is going on. I just do not read nor reply.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:34 AM
Response to Original message |