Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Palin is appealing to some key sociodemographics and we'd better wise up.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AnarchoFreeThinker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 10:30 AM
Original message
Palin is appealing to some key sociodemographics and we'd better wise up.
Edited on Tue Sep-02-08 10:45 AM by dmsRoar
There are crucial blocks of voters that the numerous Palin scandals will in fact cater to and attract to the ticket. We've got to face facts here, and it ain't pretty.

1. Anti-American secessionist patriots. Not a large group, but a group rarely wooed. They'll love her.

2. Parents who preach abstinence only who are soon to be surprise grandparents. In our country this is a massive block of voters whose self-righteous hypocrisy has finally been validated by someone equally as self-righteous and hypocritical.

3. Reformers who ran 527s and copped millions in earmarks. Now the average Joe who's run a 527 and touted reform can vote for a real role model.

4. Bitter busybodies who help hatch revenge plots against their sisters ex-husbands. Ever watch Nancy Grace? The country is teeming with these folks. And make no mistake about it: as their hateful lives collapse around them they'll still find time to vote on Election Day as long as it doesn't interfere with their plans to hit someone.

5. Polar bear lovers who hate the terrain that provides polar bear habitat. I think by now we all realize that polar bears are awesome, so awesome they wouldn't allow themselves the wussy designation of "endangered" if they had any say about it. There's no need to protect such totally awesome polar bears by not drilling right through their dens to black gold. And, let's face it, Democrats have dropped the ball on capturing the mood of the electorate on this.

6. Voters who have been looking for a Vice President who professes no understanding of what a Vice president does. Let's not kid ourselves. If we're honest, that's exactly the kind of Vice President we all have secretly desired during these times of great national crisis. But what kind of lame ass does the Democratic Party put up? Yep, someone with a full grasp of all the issues who is ready to step into the job immediately.

7. Parents of children serving in Iraq or about to serve in Iraq who profess no knowledge or understanding of the nature of the conflict in Iraq that will be affecting their children. Sure, perhaps only eight or nine voters nationwide fall into this group, but they've found their candidate. And they vote.

8. Freudians. Fans of one of psychology's true pioneers simply can't believe how enamored they are with the McCain-Palin ticket. Really, they can't believe it. They can't stop thinking about it or talking about it either. Let's face it, they're obsessing about it. If they could vote three times for this ticket they would while screaming "Electra" in the booth.

9. Women who want to vote for a woman who loves causes that are harmful to women. I'm sorry to report that Palin is the perfect VP for those voters willing to stand underneath the glass ceiling as it shatters and impales them with thousands of foot-long dagger-shards.

10. Voters hoping for more politicians who wrench tax money from their grasps in order to build bridges to nowhere and then deny they ever wanted to build bridges to nowhere. We're in trouble, fellow Democrats. It's true. The republicans have totally wrapped up the stupid vote.



ed for sp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. You forgot to add the Flat Earth Society
And people who either believe that Adam & Eve had to fight off dinosaur attacks, or believe that dinosaurs never existed at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ogneopasno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. Hilarious.
Well done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatBO Donating Member (713 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. K&R for hilarious...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. Sounds like a party of one. I'm waiting for the media to latch onto #1 and her "anti-Americanism".
Edited on Tue Sep-02-08 10:36 AM by Feeney2
They have given voice to McCain on Obama and Michelle being anti-American, but being part of a group that wants to succeed is by defintion anti-American.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
5. K&R for unexpected delivery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
6. bah hahahah. you funny. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alter Ego Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
7. You very nearly had me--bravo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurgherHoldtheLies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
8. The "glass ceiling" with "thousands of foot-long dagger-shards." made me LOL
Great image of what Palin really represents for women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renie408 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
9. ROFL! I love the "foot-long dagger-shards." part....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
10. "Palin voter, party of one. Palin voter, party of one".
Very funny OP!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
11. Was anyone offended by Palin's 18 million CRACKS statement?

She really emphasized that word, crack, after hearing it for the 5th time.

Anyway great OP....... nominated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. English professors throughout the land are still roaring about that.
"Hillary Clinton put 18 million cracks in the glass ceiling..."

I didn't get it at first, but to English professors that is the height of humor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. Sailors and Construction workers caught that too n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellerpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
12. Thanks for revealing these frightening constituencies.
I'm shaking! :scared: Also, K&R! :dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
13. At a party over the weekend
since I was the well-known Democrat of the bunch, I had several people who are Republicans ask me what I thought about Palin. I answered, "Oh, the bimbo?" which elicited a disgusted look on their face followed by their mandatory, "But seriously...". I replied I was serious (more disgust). I then would explain I was concerned about her lack of experience, etc. Several times I got the, "But Obama's experience, etc." The first time I said, "surely you're not comparing Chicago to Alaska?" I would also explain that I was an original Hillary supporter. That invariably got a "You're not still going to vote for Obama, are you?" to which I replied, "As if there's a real choice here? Just who else is there to vote for?"

One woman explained how her husband who is a geologist with an oil company and how they thought she was a great pick. I told her that I thought that the two of them should vote for McCain as that was in their best interest, but I'm not in the oil business.

So there are some people who are supporting McCain in spite of the very obvious shortcomings of Palin. And they are actually intelligent, albeit narrow thinking people too.

I asked my wife later if I had a sign on my back that said "The Democrat"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
14. You mean key sociopaths!
Edited on Tue Sep-02-08 10:49 AM by hedgehog
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
15. I agree that she will appeal to a LARGE group in #2. However...

This absolutely is *not* hypocrisy. It may make abstinence only education look naive and foolish for not teaching them about birth control. But it is definitely not hypocritical.

Hypocrisy would have been teaching her daughter about birth control. So her daughter ending up pregnant is evidence that the Palin is not a hypocrite on this subject.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnarchoFreeThinker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. would she be a hypocrite if she still professed the efficacy of abstinence-only doctrine?
Edited on Tue Sep-02-08 11:50 AM by dmsRoar
Because I bet she does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. No. I don't believe that word means what you think it means.

Hypocrisy means you say one thing while doing the opposite. Hypocrisy does not mean you say something which happens to be wrong.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnarchoFreeThinker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. "feigning to believe what one does not." --Merriam Webster
So my question stands....do you think she still professes the efficacy of abstinence-only doctrine? If so, she's a hypocrite.

(But thanks for the attempt at the lesson.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. How do you know she does not believe that which she preaches?

But thanks for the lesson on mind reading!

:)


Actually, you base your argument on a false pretense: she favors only teaching abstinence because she believes it is as effective as sex education. Having been so recently tutored in mind-reading :), I will undertake that same exercise and agree with you that she does NOT believe it is as effective.

Now, to be a hypocrite, she would have to be arguing that it is. Has she?

You and I argue this case from a physical world perspective. I don't care how much fucking teenagers do, but I would like to help them protect themselves from negative consequences as a result.

The abstinence-only crowd are only concerned with the soul. So far as they are concerned, pre-marital fucking damages that soul. For the more radical even inter-marital fucking damages that soul. Physically they actually WANT women indulging in pre-marital sex to get pregnant as that serves as a reminder to others not to.


You could certainly drag up a lot of quotes along the lines of, "abstinence works best." But what do they mean by that exactly? Given that nobody ever got preggers by not engaging in sexual activities {insert in-vitro disclaimer here}, then it is true that actual abstinence, not the theory, teaching or planning on abstinence, but really and truly abstaining from sexual activies is the one absolutely guaranteed way not to get pregnant.

Or as my sister said, "the rhythm method worked perfectly; the first time we had sex when we knew we shouldn't have, we got pregnant".

Again, you and they would see completely different meanings in the sentence, "abstinence works best". It does work best when practiced. While teaching alternatives for those who will not pratice it works best for when it is not practiced.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
16. An insightful and penetrating analysis..
Also, pretty damn funny!!!

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
17. lol! You had me until the polar bears!
k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
19. 11. Middle aged Republicans who lust for a trophy wife.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnarchoFreeThinker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. a huge swing vote, no doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbie Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
24. the 24% who still think * is doing a FINE job.
:freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC