Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Andrew Sullivan NAILS IT: It's About McCain

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 11:28 AM
Original message
Andrew Sullivan NAILS IT: It's About McCain
Or, his reader nails it:

http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/09/its-about-mccai.html


As the Palin pick starts dominating the news cycles - and not in a good way - you have to ask yourself what the fundamental point of this story is. I can't put it better than this reader:

I don't think it's Troopergate, the curious pregnancy, the pregnant unwed daughter, the Alaskan separatists, or the bottomless ignorance that makes the difference. Palin is by any measure the worst vice presidential pick of the modern age (which considering Agnew, Quayle and Eagleton is quite a statement). The killer is McCain's decision-making process and what this tells us about it. The man is a risk-taker who makes snap decisions "from the gut." He liked Palin. She looked like a maverick and a bit like himself. He didn't invest the time or resources to look into her deeply.
How can a person like this be put at the helm in a time of skyrocketing international tensions?


...
How seriously does he take service to his country when he make a decision this important this crazily?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Pisces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. No Judgment = John McCain. This is the bottom line. Not qualified to be Pres. in dangerous times
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Hair trigger reactive and craven.
Edited on Tue Sep-02-08 11:36 AM by Skidmore
Neither a "uniter" or a "decider"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well, yeah. Question is, is this point obvious enough for the MSM to admit to it? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I think they already have. Their grilling the campaign on the decision and it's quite obvious
To viewers that this is a total failure of judgement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. Most of 'em are afraid to come out and say it...
...and some of what we're seeing is veiled messages from the MSM that they'll tiptoe for as long as they can, but that the GOP had better undo this in a hurry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libnnc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. To Grampy McNutter, it's all just one big game of craps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
6. That's what it all boils down to.
This is his first real decision of his potential presidency and he might as well as thrown a dart at a phone book for all the effort he put into it. We don't need another useless lazy fuck for a president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwyjibo Donating Member (612 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. He actually may have been better off doing that, and calling it a choice to represent
the average American - a random American.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarcoated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
8. I've been saying this since he picked her
And it's shut down Republican's who I talk to that want to got there with me. They can dance around, nit-pick, go on tangents about their candidate's freak show. But she's not the debate. It's about McLame and his judgment, which leads to the issue of temperment. I can't believe how easily McLame was played.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BklynChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
9. it's about his lacking judgment and his "temperament" issues (impulsive, spontaneous choice)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
10. I think in light of the NYT story, the bigger question is this
Who *forced* McShame to choose Palin? If he wanted to "do Joe or Ridge" who told a potential POTUS no, you have to choose Palin to shore up the base?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowdogintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. ding ding ding....not only who told him, but why? What did they have on him
that would cause him to acquiesce?




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. I definitely think there's something more going on in that little statement. (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC