Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Isn't the fact Palin's AIP membership disqualifies her for Security Clearances a big deal?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 12:23 PM
Original message
Isn't the fact Palin's AIP membership disqualifies her for Security Clearances a big deal?
AIP is on the list the military and government use when doing background checks before issuing Security Clearances.

The list of organizations and party memberships includes anything related to Communists and Alaskan Independence Party and also the Hawaiian secessionist party.

She is almost certainly not going to be getting security clearance unless Bush gives it to her as an exception.

How is this not a VERY big deal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
crazylikafox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. wow. If true, great catch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's a huge deal, but the MSM hasn't picked up on it yet
they are still distracted by the other story involving s*e*x
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadrasT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. Pretty much seems a deal BREAKER to me. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. HOLY FUCKING SHIT!!! It would be illegal for her to be VP!!!!
There would be no getting around that law!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. No, Bush or any POTUS can grant anyone security clearances. Remember Plame Scandal?
And someone stated that the President automatically gets it.

Don't know about VP.

But as a candidate, she'd have to rely on Bush giving it to her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. That wouldn't play too well with real republicans, if there are any left.
Plus Bush is miffed with them right now, and you know how petty and vindictive he always is.

The fundies of course will just thank their god.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. Please provide a link for that.
It would be killer, IF TRUE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Fingers crossed!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. 2 military DU'ers (long term members) confirmed this. I don't have a link to the list the military
and government uses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Independent confirmation would be helpful.
Otherwise, it's going to be pretty hard to sell as a "fact".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Here's the first bit I could find googling
Edited on Tue Sep-02-08 12:49 PM by cryingshame
copy of an actual form to fill out for govt. security clearance:
http://usmilitary.about.com/library/pdf/sf86.pdf

I cannot find the actual list they have when interviewing in person. However, looking over questionnaire, they go over your background.

This was on the questionnaire linked to above:

Information relating to the following issues may be considered significant in relation to holding a clearance:

Allegiance to the U.S.
Foreign Influence
Foreign preference
Sexual Behavior
Personal Conduct
Financial Considerations
Alcohol Consumption
Drug Involvement
Emotional, Mental and Personality Disorders
Criminal Conduct
Security Violations
Outside Activities Misuse of Information Technology Systems


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 12:27 PM
Original message
This is huge if true - can anyone fact check this?
If this proves to be true (I don't doubt you, cryingshame, I just want solid factual evidence in black and white), we need to get this out there to the media and other friendly sources. Hammer the AIP business home - this is a "personal issue" that affects us all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. WOW..do you have a link for us who share this info w bipartisan forums?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. Link, please.
I've seen that repeated several times this morning, but I'd love to see an official list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. Interesting. Link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
12. Here is some info (although not on AIP specifically):
"sedition, or other act whose aim is to overthrow the Government of the United States or alter the form of government by unconstitutional means"

from:


Security Clearance Guidelines

Allegiance to the United States




The Concern. An individual must be of unquestioned allegiance to the United States. The willingness to safeguard classified information is in doubt if there is any reason to suspect an individual's allegiance to the United States.

Conditions that could raise a security concern and may be disqualifying include:

a. Involvement in any act of sabotage, espionage, treason, terrorism, sedition, or other act whose aim is to overthrow the Government of the United States or alter the form of government by unconstitutional means;

b. Association or sympathy with persons who are attempting to commit, or who are committing, any of the above acts;

c. Association or sympathy with persons or organizations that advocate the overthrow of the United States Government, or any state or subdivision, by force or violence or by other unconstitutional means;

d. Involvement in activities which unlawfully advocate or practice the commission of acts of force or violence to prevent others from exercising their rights under the Constitution or laws of the United States or of any state.


http://usmilitary.about.com/library/milinfo/security/blallegiance.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
13. If you can provide a link to the list, that story and link should be sent to every news outlet
to every reporter, and to every TV talking head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
17. Does she?
Showing in-depth allegiance through voter registration--that's the most likely way to take the actual evidence--is iffy.

If it's a past tense thing, one has to wonder if Byrd's KKK membership was a problem.

Then there was the video address Palin made to the AIP for the convention. Listen to it: I agree with your goal to do X--which makes salient there are other goes; highlighting one leaves the others de-emphasized, possibly excluded, since she's taking the time to be explicit about her agreement. This is a pragmatic implicature. Cf.: "Oh, John, I love you and want to have sex with you!" ... "Marcia, I want to have sex with you, too!"

But more to the point, she clearly says she supports the AK constitution in that address. The constitution is the AIP sticking point: They claim it was illegitimately ratified, so secession or reversion to territorial status is appropriate. "Annulment" is a good term for that. By supporting the constitution, she says they're wrong; moreover, it explicitly says that it's written to be part of the "Union of States". This is a logical entailment, unless she's just lying--why she would be lying on this point then to them, I'll leave others to speculate. In other words, what's claimed to entail support for the AIP's secessionist goals, can only entail the opposite.

Now, *that's* spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
18. Youthful indiscretions mean nothing if a 'puke is the indiscreet one
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC