Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The danger: The Left's complete misunderstanding of "Church Culture"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 01:54 PM
Original message
The danger: The Left's complete misunderstanding of "Church Culture"
Palin was brought onto the ticket for two reasons - one far more important than the other.

1. Fix McCain's problems with the Religious Right.
2. Try to convince extraordinarily angry Hillary voters to cast a protest vote.

I'm not sure how many bitter-enders there really are for Hillary (I'm convinced that most of the PUMA crowd are Republican operatives). And I'm not sure how many of those would vote for a woman who would outlaw abortion in all circumstances. So, the impact will be negligible, I hope.

However, she was viewed enthusiastically by the Religious Right. And they are not going to let her go.

The Left's problem with the Religious Right has always been a fundemental misunderstanding of "Church Culture." I grew up in a church that probably wouldn't be classified as Fundamentalist, but was certainly Bible-based, conservative, and made up of the kind of people that Palin appeals to. I will call them "Church People" for short.

Church People do not care about your sin or your failings, as long as you seek redemption. There seems to be this belief that because her daugther had sex or her husband had a DUI, that church people will say "Tsk tsk" and walk away. The exact opposite is going to happen. Her support is going to skyrocket among the Religious Right after this.

Churches in this country are cauldrons are moral failings. Divorces, affairs, drinking problems, drug problems, violence problems. All of these are sitting in pews every Sunday. And everyone knows who suffers from what. And all that really matters to the typical member is that you keep coming back. Some Independent Baptist may get hung up on Church Discipline, but they are a small group and even they almost always try to find a way to keep you in the Church.

You may see a hypocrisy here considering the ugly attacks on Clinton, Kennedy, Edwards, etc. But the difference is the "in the church/out of the church" question. And, you know, some partisan nastiness.

Out of the calvacade of dirt coming out of Alaska right now, the state trooper issue really strikes me as the one with the most legs and least risk for the Dems. I'm not even sure the secessionist group will have that much impact.

Anything baby/daughter related is a very very dangerous thing to talk about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. A great failing of Democrats is that we think everyone should believe as we do
and when they don't or don't follow what we view as our impeccable logic we are totally befuddled by the whole thing and simply write them off as idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. They are idiots but writing them off is foolish
they must therefore be defeated and brought down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
23. Right, because they do not appreciate that we know what is best for them,
and for everybody else for that matter. I can't wait until Liberals rule the world--it will be heaven on earth and God help anyone who disagrees with us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Considering how motivated our own base is, this election will come down to Independents and moderate
s, and thankfully McCain just shot himself in the foot with this pick in that regard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Possibly
We are still an old-fashioned country in a lot of ways and we are getting dangerously close to "piling on the poor little woman" territory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Exactly.
It isn't about the Republican or Democratic bases, it's about the moderate and independent voters. There is a reason Obama leads by nearly 10 points in every poll and it's because McCain has an issue grabbing those voters who aren't Democrat or Republican.

Remember, the GOP base was solidly behind Dole in 1996, but it didn't help them one lick because Clinton won his base and the middle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. The time it takes to shore up the base matters
Dole had to do a lot of ass-kissing with the fundies and resign from the Senate and make a one-pledge promise to everyone already thinking about the Bush boys in 2000. And he had to bring in Kemp for the supply-siders. It took him forever to get his soldiers behind him. And by then, it was too late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. One could say the same about McCain and Palin.
We have two months until the election, that doesn't give McCain a ton of time to rally the base without turning off the middle.

McCain is already down 8 or so points nationally. He'll probably cut into that lead with his convention, but it won't be enough to gain the lead, or tie it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. I agree whole heartedly...
I was raised in a charismatic church. I don't ascribe to that belief so much now. I'm more of a Unitarian at this point.

But I "GET" the evangelical culture and, at least if the Internet is any indication, I get the feeling that a lot of people who haven't been "on the inside" don't get how deeply entrenched the church is when you are talking about the communities that embrace them (and there are a LOT of them in this country).

Its the same reason a lot of the people who were attacking Rev. Wright are totally clueless about the inner-city, urban, African American culture and the kind of message that people of that origin want to hear in their church and just how common that type of "preaching" is in churches of that nature. Its a misunderstanding of perception for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. The parallel to black churches and Wright is a great one
I kept asking the people here who were all fired up about Wright this question:

"What do you think happens in black churches?" and no one had a real issue.

Too many activists on the Left think they know what goes on inside churches and they don't.

It's no mystery that the most successful Democratic politician since the 60s understood "Church Culture" inside and out. Because - and here is the real catch - Church culture is much closer to be the dominant American culture than almost anything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurgherHoldtheLies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. The majority of this country does not follow end-times rapture doctrine. Video of her at DU link
I think the possibility of her getting next to the nukes with a desire to bring upon end times is a relevant and important subject for the general public to see.

Here's a link to a DU thread on her beliefs with link to video at Huffington Post of Sarah speaking in June 2008.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x6882521
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
10. I don't think I agree with everything you said
I do agree that the baby thing should be left alone. But, the AIP ties will completely destroy her as a candidate. How can you possibly have a vice president - next in line for president - who can't get a security clearance? The fundies will hang onto her, but no one else will, because to do so is to publically claim that you are anti-American.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. They would never have voted Obama, but this election will be decided by Indies and I
fail to see how Indies will line up behind McCain/Palin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bernardo de La Paz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. Libs use two foundations, Cons use five. Read this PDF. It's important to understand all 5.
Libs use two foundations, Cons use five. Read this PDF. It's important to understand all five.

Five moral foundations and liberals and conservatives: video: http://www.newyorker.com/online/video/conference/2007/haidt PDF: http://faculty.virginia.edu/haidtlab/articles/haidt.graham.2007.when-morality-opposes-justice.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
13. The Left does not "completely misunderstand" church culture! Ridiculous!
We know that because Dubya repented and was born again, he was able to mislead a whole bunch of fundamentalists. Clearly, they liked that sinner.

We know fundamentalists pretend to welcome all sinners but are very hypocritical in that. Just a pretense. Only welcome sinners who have repented to their version of God.

We know those bottom lines. But when we're criticizing that hypocrisy, we're not trying to convince the Wahabi Christians (aka Christian Taliban). We're reminding moderates and independents that these fundamentalists are often lying hypocrites. That they are extremists who seek to impose social controls they themselves violate quite regularly.

We're reminding moderates and independents that as much as the fundies talk up their abstinence programs, they do not work. Even with committed parents like the Palins.

We're reminding moderates and independents that Sarah wanted Creationism taught in Science class, and issuing a warning.

We understand fundamentalist Christian culture. We also know fundies are a fringe group. Palin is part of the extremist fringes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
14. I was raised in fully Fundy chruches
So I know our church called your type backsliders! And I also understand church life, and I'm way on the left. You went to some luke warm, watered down church that probably is not even Full Gospel...sure you understand it. Keep telling yourself that. Fundy is as Fundy does, and if you were not in a Fundy church, you don't know Fundy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NRaleighLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
16. There is another, even scarier element of the Church culture, as I heard discussed by Bill Moyers -
It is that many of them actually believe that they have been already chosen for "salvation", and that no matter what they do in life, it is not possible for them to be removed from that chosen status.

I view organized religion as a very, very successful business first and foremost, with the church leadership preying on the vulnerable parishoners, most of whom like being told what to do (easier than thinking for themselves). They really scare me, on the whole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. That's Calvinism
Calvinism is its own branch on the Protestant tree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
17. Its not what the candidate does necessarily its what they preach
And if she is pushing hard line Christian rhetoric then they will forgive nearly anything. As long as she continues to push the faith.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
19. I am a church person, just not an extremist.
Fortunately for us, Failin' Palin is an extremist; while most church goers are not.

You are underestimating the Church Culture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. I'm glad to say that a majority of people at my church are Dems.
I was so pleased to discover that in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
20. My church is bible based. What Christian church ISN'T bible based?
A church doesn't have to be conservative to be a bible-based church.

I've had people ask if my church was a bible-believing church. And by that they meant THEIR conservative interpretation.

So that one bugs me too.

My teeth continue to itch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
22. I'm glad a few people have found this gem of a post
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libertypirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
24. Your not bright
Tie her to John's neck and let her sink him.

A person goes into premature labor.

Do they
A. Get on an airplane for 7 hours?
B. Find the nearest hospital?

She is a problem.....

Oh and stop playing fear this, I don't fear people who believe in fairy tales; I pity the fools!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
25. Palin Has More Appeal To Independent Men (or Did) Than She Would to Any Woman Who'd Vote for Clinton
My Republican female friends are more pissed off about Palin than my Dem friends. They're not any dumber than Hil supporters who told Dems to go screw themselves at the thought of Sebelius as VP nom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
26. I think Obama and his team get it. I think a lot of blogosphere types (and DUers) don't
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
27. The words "religious" and "conservative" do not mean "insane".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 06:07 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. In These Trying Times, They Do
Maybe not in 1970, maybe not even in 1985, but today, the subsets are identical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC