Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The criticism of Palin is NOT about her "choosing to work"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
complain jane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 04:46 PM
Original message
The criticism of Palin is NOT about her "choosing to work"
it's about her choosing to CAMPAIGN and possibly serve as the VICE PRESIDENT of the United States with children who obviously need her attention between her special-needs infant and her pregnant teenage daughter.

On Hardball just now, someone was saying that there is now criticism from women "on the left" of Sarah Palin for "choosing to work" while having a Down's syndrome baby.

What bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Vice Presidency is not a fucking 9-to-5--remember the phone ringing at 3 AM?
Yeesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. When did we start telling women how to lead their lives or raise their kids?
I must have missed that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
complain jane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. When this one chose to run for office and wants to insert the government into my reproductive rights
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. So, you want to reclaim your personal rights by taking away hers?
Is that the deal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
complain jane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. No, I want to question the woman who wants to take away my rights.
Lose the hysteria.

Anyone who wants to tell me how to run certain aspects of my personal life will not only be scrutinized- but refraining from doing so is irresponsible.

Especially when her way obviously doesn't work.

Get over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why Not Let Republicans Come to That Conclusion On Their Own
Right now, using hardball tactics on the Palin women over Bristol's pregnancy is like shooting fish in a barrel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. It's not shooting fish in a barrel unless you're listening with liberal ears.
It's ginning up support for the most laughable VP choice in time immemorial.

I can hear those fundies rushing to support her right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. When Are They Going to Clean House
This board is so gamed ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Sometimes I think we've just all been contaminated by 15 years
or more of Republican rule and Republican owned media.

That Rude Pundit post speculating about Bristol Palin's vagina got more than 15 votes.

What is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Rude Pundit
Is breaking my heart with that stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. That sounds more like criticism I would expect to come from the right.
I think they are trying to offload Dr. Laura onto us.

Liberals and Democrats do not usually make personal judgement calls about if a woman should or should not work. F!@#! Does ANYONE remember women's liberation at all?!!! It was about the right to make the choice that made sense for YOU.

Most poor or middle-class women do not have the LUXURY of making the choice to stay home with their children, disabled or not. They work to put food on the table and clothes on their backs and to pay for healthcare and shelter.

If you are making the case that Palin should not be Vice President because of her new son or her daughter's situation - I am 100% opposed to that position. You say "what bullshit" but your first sentence sounds like you are trying to dictate her options. As a matter of fact, your first 2 sentences are complete contradictions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raebrek Donating Member (467 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. If this works now in this situation
Then you can expect it to be chanted through the years every time a woman runs for a political office.

Raebrek!!!

I'm with you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
complain jane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Why is it
Edited on Tue Sep-02-08 08:07 PM by the dogfish
that the choices presented seem to only be limited to running a full time political campaign, or staying home?

Like choosing another career-oriented option that's not so consuming isn't a possibility I guess?

That's what I'm mad about, the mischaracterization.

I'm not apologizing for the fact that I think if she has a baby at home with special needs and a teenager that's pregnant, her fucking family should come first- but that doesn't mean "staying home". It means choosing a career move that's fair to the responsibilities she's already taken on.

ESPECIALLY if she's running as a "family values" politician.

That's sexist now? That's backwards? Get real.

God forbid someone suggests she weigh her options and base her decision on whether or not she's giving both this family and the people of the United States their fare share.

I don't care if she's male or female.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. I suppose rich people have nannies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
12. that's the latest talking point: playing the reverse feminist victim card....
Stephen Hayes, Cheney biographer/repub shill extraordinaire just said that the way the left is ATTACKING Palin for trying to be a working mother has him more "FIRED UP" than he's been in Years!

it struck me as he said it that it's the same thing I've been hearing since yesterday, and followed Jack Cafferty's mentioning that he heard similar RW talking points on EVERY Sunday chat show, "some word for word"

that was funny. Hayes sat there, shaking his head, in a mute attempt to refute the obvious truth

excellent moment, almost on the level with Campbell Brown

can't wait to see what she has to say tonight about causing Larry King to lose his exclusive with PO Dubya
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC