Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This is really funny and typical of repukes. GOP claims Palin’s teen daughter's pregnancy is all

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
curious one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 04:28 AM
Original message
This is really funny and typical of repukes. GOP claims Palin’s teen daughter's pregnancy is all
Hillary's fault.

When repukes learn to be responsible for their acts? Blame it on anybody.

link:
http://www.legitgov.org/shulman_hillary_fault_030908.html

Snip//

Satire by R J Shulman
ST. PAUL, Minnesota – Key leaders of the Republican Party are going on the offensive to head off criticism of their new Vice Presidential candidate Alaska Governor Sarah Palin due to the disclosure that her 17-year old unmarried daughter Bristol is pregnant. "If it wasn't for Hillary’s long time support of loose morals and whipping up women to think they can make decisions about their own bodies, none of this would have happened," said Grover Norquist, anti-tax activist and GOP leader. “Staying married to that cheating liar of a husband of hers, gave the message to our daughters that it is acceptable to lose all respect for themselves and to forget our all important teachings of abstinence only. Shame on the Clintons. They should be impeached all over again,” said senior McCain advisor Steve Schmidt.

"The focus of blame lies clearly with the Clintons and the rest of the Godless Democrats," said Family Research president Tony Perkins, “and certainly not with the Palin's. Fortunately, their daughter Bristol believes in pro-life and will keep the child and will marry the child’s father as soon as a suitable father can be located.” More importantly for Palin and the Republicans, the elder statesman of the evangelical movement, James Dobson of the powerful Focus on the Family organization said he backs Palin completely. "We all know that this teen pregnancy is the result of the Democrat Party’s unabashed support of the gay agenda."

"This disclosure will not hurt the Republican ticket but actually help it," said Annette Ratliff a Texas delegate to the GOP convention. "It shows that the Palin's wrestle with the same problems as ordinary Americans and their handling of it shows strength, determination and that they are just like us. Now if it was Chelsea Clinton or one of the Obama girls who got pregnant when they are teens, it would be nothing less than a message to the American people of a shameful flaunting of immoral behavior encouraged by parents in league with the devil himself."

03 September 2008




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 04:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. There's a "satire" advisory up-front. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 04:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. Don't forget the "librul media"
We are devils, aren't we? I rather relish it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 04:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. these people are so fucked up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 04:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. "....this teen pregnancy is the result of the Democrat Party’s unabashed support of the gay agenda."
Really. That's interesting. A heterosexual teenage pregnancy is the fault of gay people. I wonder why I even bother following politics sometimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marsala Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 04:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. Thank goodness for that "Satire" disclaimer
Without that, I would not be able to tell if it was real or not. They are that far out there.

Okay, I'd be leaning towards "not", but the real names lend it a touch of plausibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC