redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 10:42 AM
Original message |
Why are people picking on Levi and Bristol? |
|
And about such petty bullshit, too.
Seriously... WTF?
And regarding him calling himself "trash"... IF he did, that's his right and it's much different than someone hatefully calling him the same thing.
I can call myself a bitch if I like... but if you use that term about me in a nasty way that is completely different and all of you damn well know it.
We all have a line between what we consider acceptable and what we don't... I guess this is mine.
Picking on teenagers for no reason other than they're related to people you don't like / support for office... shameful.
|
NMDemDist2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 10:43 AM
Response to Original message |
1. actually I think they're cute kids |
|
too bad nobody told them about birth control so they could have some fun and not have to get married in high school
|
Cronus Protagonist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
51. Yeah, they're both adorable |
|
That's a plus for George McCain, but beauty seldom comes with brains...
|
Lorien
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
65. Sure, cute until you read Levi's MySpace page |
|
He's a neo-con fascist who can vote.
|
trueblue2007
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 10:43 AM
Response to Original message |
2. This has been debated AD NAUSEM. Redqueen = like you mean a Republican? |
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
10. Yeah, that's what I mean. |
NYC_SKP
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
27. OMG....you're the Red Queen!!!! |
|
The famous Conservative crossdresser from, I don't know, Ohio?
:sarcasm:
|
Whisp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 10:44 AM
Response to Original message |
3. so agree with you. there is no need to go there |
|
why some weak assed minds what to wallow in this is beyond me. there is sooooooooo much to criticize and have fun with without including the kids.
it's disgusting beyond words.
|
Dammit Ann
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 10:44 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Totally agree with you. |
|
I feel terribly sorry for those kids.
|
melody
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 10:45 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Why did she stick her children out as props? |
|
Levi and Bristol are both essentially adults. Palin made the choice to draw them into the line of fire by trying to use them in her political fantasy.
|
Whisp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
12. you can't mean that when Obama had his kids on stage |
|
that it was fair game to go after them?
pleeeeeeeease.
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
15. So you think it's A-OK to act like Rush Limbaugh because her mom made a choice? |
|
So... punish the child for the sins of the mother... is that it?
|
melody
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
26. When you're fighting sociopaths, you have to hit back hard |
|
Palin is an extremist. She would destroy the tiny shreds of a Republic we've got left. So now, she puts her adult children in the line of fire, they're fair game. This is a political war.
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #26 |
31. Enjoy being the flipside to Rush / his fans. |
|
Pardon me if I don't join you.
|
melody
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #31 |
34. If that's what it takes to knock you people down |
|
That is what it takes. My pacifist days are long behind me.
|
cwydro
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #34 |
78. That tactic will not win for us and hurts the ticket. |
|
Are you just too lazy to look for a real issue?
Palin is a right wing anti-just about everything wacko. Surely yo can find something else to get worked up about.
|
greguganus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #34 |
98. I just sent an email to admins to check the ignore function to see if it is working. n/t |
sniffa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #34 |
greguganus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
97. I thought you had RQ on ignore. n/t |
MyUncle
(798 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
94. All candidate kids go on stage, including ours. Always. It's a formula. |
dkf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 10:45 AM
Response to Original message |
6. They are the poster kids for the evangelical crowd. |
|
But I agree calling them "trash" isn't going to win any fans. I don't get this "trash" thing anyway. Its not a concept we use here in Hawaii.
|
Virginia Dare
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 10:45 AM
Response to Original message |
7. Because people are angry and mean-spirited and they aren't perfect...n/t |
BeyondGeography
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
32. Hey, I resemble that remark |
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
36. Yeah, you're right I know... I just figured so soon after Palin got up there and played the bully... |
|
I guess maybe I thought we wouldn't be so quick to do the same, given such a recent example of it.
Maybe some people liked it and think it's effective.
|
Virginia Dare
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #36 |
75. Few people are like The Christ and can turn the other cheek.. |
|
or maybe they can only do that for so long. You reap what you sow.
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #75 |
80. Another excellent point... |
|
I don't expect turning cheeks... that guy didn't come out swinging at us last night did he?
This isn't self defense... this is just getting picked on and then turning around and then picking on another person.
|
Virginia Dare
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #80 |
83. I guess you just don't feel the self righteous anger.. |
|
Edited on Thu Sep-04-08 11:52 AM by Virginia Dare
that some of the rest of us do. I agree, some of it has been way over the top, but as an imperfect person, I come here to vent too, so I guess I understand where they are coming from.
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #83 |
84. I do... I just feel a need to direct it where it belongs. (nt) |
Virginia Dare
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #84 |
86. Good on you for having excellent self-control....n/t |
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 10:45 AM
Response to Original message |
8. Where have people done this? I must have missed it. |
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #17 |
19. OK, one thread does not a universal problem here make. |
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #19 |
22. PLEASE tell me where I said it's a universal problem. |
AspenRose
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 10:46 AM
Response to Original message |
9. I feel sorry for them. And for the baby too. |
melody
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
13. I feel sorry for the non-adult children |
|
They didn't have a choice.
|
AspenRose
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
onenote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
42. does that apply to all children that are paraded on stage at conventions? |
|
Because both parties do it and have for a long time.
|
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #42 |
68. When those kids are undergoing a very difficult personal issue, it's probably best |
|
to NOT join the ticket to begin with, and attend to your own affairs. Especially when you also have a brand-new infant, as well as other children who need your time and attention, and your husband is NOT a stay at home parent--sounds like they don't quite have a handle on family life in Alaska, so how would she manage it with the VP or President slot? Michelle and Barack have gone to great lengths to ensure their daughters are attended to, are not exploited, and have normal lives--Michelle quit her job when the campaign started, and her mother watches the girls when she's away--and most of the time, Michelle is there every evening. Obama has even received criticism for taking crucial time off the campaign trail to spend time with his daughters. Families are a part of campaigns, and it's fair to judge how functional they are. I see dysfunction in the Palin family, but Miss Mooseburgers and "First Dude" refuse to let it curb their ambitions--that's my take.
|
confused08
(33 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
92. did the adult children? |
|
seems like its the parent's choice regardless of whether the child is a minor or not.... i think it is odd though that you seldom see McCain's kids even though you always see his wife... I know that one or two of his sons are/were in Iraq or Afghanistan so that explains some of it but doesnt he have a bunch more? I've seen Meghan but not since after the primaries (too bad... I think she is hot, even if she probably is an evil REPUgnant-can like her dad) but haven't seen the others... doesn't have an adopted daughter or something?
just like how you seldom see Jill Biden around... just think it is odd how much focus the media puts on the Obama and Palin families but not the other two
|
greguganus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
99. Did you feel sorry for Obama's "non-adult children" too? n/t |
faithfulcitizen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 10:46 AM
Response to Original message |
11. I haven't seen such posts. If so, they are few and far between. Hardly worthy of starting a whole |
|
Edited on Thu Sep-04-08 11:05 AM by faithfulcitizen
new thread about it.
|
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
14. Agreed--if you see a bad comment, then address the commenter, or alert it-- |
|
don't start a meme that we're ALL doing it. That's stupid.
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
18. Oh please... I didn't say "I'M ASHAMED OF DU!" or any stupid shit like that. |
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #18 |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #29 |
auntAgonist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
41. "...don't start a meme that we're ALL doing it. That's stupid " |
|
Where did redqueen say that we were "ALL" doing it?
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #41 |
43. I didn't... but to be fair, those kinds of threads have been around... |
|
Edited on Thu Sep-04-08 11:05 AM by redqueen
they bother me as much as anyone, with the poor wording and meme-ishness of the blanket accusation / observation.
|
auntAgonist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #43 |
47. NO you didn't! I was quoting the poster I replied to .. |
|
You did nothing wrong in asking your question in the original OP.
:)
troll accusations and generalizations are rampant in this thread. You are no troll :)
:hug:
aA
|
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #41 |
45. I dunno, I guess that unless there's an epidemic of inappropriate threads, it's |
|
Edited on Thu Sep-04-08 11:06 AM by wienerdoggie
best to contain the damage to the ONE offensive thread instead of starting another to basically scold and start a flame war.
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #45 |
49. Thanks for your advice. |
|
I'll be sure to check with you before starting any more threads.
Jesus.
|
greguganus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #49 |
101. Next time check with a moderator-in-training. n/t |
SidneyCarton
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 10:49 AM
Response to Original message |
20. I think we've talked this one to death. |
|
I don't think Bristol's life is relevant either. But if it weren't for sex, drugs and the occasional scandal, all we'd talk about is policy.
:boring:
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #20 |
24. I know we talked about Palin to death... and how her daughter's pregnancy reflects on her political |
|
stances...
However... today it seems to have gone from pointing out that kind of stuff to just open season type attacks because of a fucking tattoo the kid has.
Seriously... this is bullshit.
|
Virginia Dare
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #24 |
76. So just ignore those posts and move on.. |
|
because pointing it out over and over again won't make it stop. I'm not done talking about her daughter's preganancy and how it reflects on her political stances, so suit yourself.
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #76 |
81. This was an entire THREAD that set me off. |
|
The OP was nothing but a picture of the couple's hands... and it showed his tattoo.
That has NOTHING to do with how that pregnancy relfects on Sarah's political stances. NOTHING.
|
AlCzervik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 10:51 AM
Response to Original message |
21. I feel bad for them and i'd hate to be judged by my parent's actions. |
depakid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 10:52 AM
Response to Original message |
25. Levi didn't look like he wanted to be there |
|
Like Aussie lefty, I kinda feel sorry for the guy.
That said- this is politics. Not a game for the squeemish.
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #25 |
28. Apparently Dems have adopted Rush Limbaugh's tactics. |
|
Edited on Thu Sep-04-08 10:55 AM by redqueen
We've gone from criticizing Bristol Palin's pregnancy because it reflects on her mothers politics... to just open season type attacks.
Seems to me that we're moving from merely questionable behavior to official Rush Limbaugh behavior.
|
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #28 |
30. Well...he IS an 18 year old man. Old enough to vote and marry and die for his country |
|
and father children. He's somebody's child, but I think he's now crossed the line into adulthood, even though he does seem immature. His parents aren't protecting him from scrutiny, they and the GOP put him front and center.
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #30 |
33. Who cares? So relatives are open to attack cause they're related to a candidate? |
|
Are you seriously saying that you think these attacks on relatives are ok?
Now if there's some "there" there, some actual reason to go after them, that's one thing... but a freaking tattoo? REALLY?!
|
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #33 |
38. Is he a relative? Or the just the dude who impregnated the Governor's daughter? |
|
Edited on Thu Sep-04-08 11:04 AM by wienerdoggie
They didn't have the shotgun wedding yet. And snickering at a tattoo is pretty tame, IMO. I won't trash the guy, nor Bristol--they are just being manipulated and marketed for political gain. But a few snarky remarks aren't that bad.
|
Peacetrain
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #33 |
44. This is what I am not getting people are not more upset about |
|
is the Palins and McCains for using those two kids. Having a child while you are still in high school can be a pretty traumatic event. Then having the ghoul squad trot you out does not help.
I don't care if you are male of female. Sometimes you put ambition on the back burner for a year or two. This did not happen to the family while she was running for the veep. All of these things happened before and she and McCain had the opportunity to pass for the sake of the kids. Any normal person would have.
But this is what the republican party has become. Power ghouls.
|
melody
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #33 |
59. If they are being used to prop up the candidate, yes |
|
The GOP were unmerciful with Carter's family.
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #59 |
63. So you didn't put me on ignore, then? |
greguganus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #63 |
102. dupe. (unless I'm on ignore) n/t |
|
Edited on Thu Sep-04-08 12:45 PM by greguganus
|
greguganus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #63 |
103. People that are self-centered HAVE to see if someone is talking about them. n/t |
melody
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #28 |
|
Clearly you know a lot more about Ruwh than we do. ;)
|
depakid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #28 |
|
We've been bending over backwards to be reasonable and have been getting our asses kicked for 15 years.
Would you like to continue that pattern for 15 more?
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #40 |
46. We're not getting our asses kicked cause we don't attack uninvolved people enough. |
|
Or do you think that's what we need to do to win votes?
|
depakid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #46 |
50. I just look at what works |
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #50 |
54. So then you DO think that it's the mocking of uninvolved people that wins votes. |
|
Well... okay then... if that's what you think.
Guess we'll have to agree to disagree on that one.
|
depakid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #54 |
55. If Americans had mocked fundies and their lot in the 1980's |
|
We wouldn't be having this conversation.
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #55 |
58. Fundies who were trying to inject their fundieness into politics? SURE! |
|
Mocking people who aren't? Not so much.
Nuance, see.
|
depakid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #58 |
66. I'm too old to do nuance |
|
in this respect.
You either want to win, given the rules of the game- or you don't.
That's the bottom line.
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #66 |
70. We all want to win... |
|
Edited on Thu Sep-04-08 11:36 AM by redqueen
the problem is nobody can agree on the rules.
My "rules" say attacking uninvolved persons for no good reason = rush-like and counterproductive.
Your "rules" are obviously different... cause apparently you believe that attacking uninvolved people for silly reasons = more votes.
Like I said... agree to disagree.
|
depakid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #70 |
|
The rules are what they are- not what you and I might wish them to be.
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #72 |
74. THERE ARE NO RULES. The GOP uses dirty tricks... should we do that too? |
|
Edited on Thu Sep-04-08 11:40 AM by redqueen
I cannot fucking believe you just sat there and told me that I don't want to win.
What the fuck...
|
melody
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #40 |
LanternWaste
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #40 |
90. Post hoc ergo prompter hoc. |
|
Post hoc ergo prompter hoc.
|
depakid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #90 |
111. You do recognize that things happen in sequence? |
|
and that the fallacy involves relying on the sequence alone?
|
LanternWaste
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #111 |
113. I slso recognize cause and effect |
|
I slso recognize cause and effect. And I see no direct causal link in this instance, only mere supposition; therefore-- post hoc ergo prompter hoc
|
depakid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #113 |
|
Perhaps you could explain?
|
LanternWaste
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-05-08 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #114 |
123. I do not see a precise and absolute causal effect |
|
Yeah, really. :eyes:
I do not see a precise and absolute causal effect between the loss in the last two elections and civility towards an opponent.
If you have absolute and precise peer-reviewed evidence that directly points towards civility being the mitigating factor in the last two elections, then I'd be happy to go over it and re-evaluate my position on this. Otherwise, post-hoc...
|
Virginia Dare
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #28 |
77. Yep, they've dished out enough, they can take some.....n/t |
Balderdash
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #77 |
89. "They" aren't taking it |
|
you're abusing a kid who has no political affiliation other than she's the kid of a player. Leave the damn kids alone. Trashing children is not going to win votes for Obama.
|
Virginia Dare
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #89 |
93. I'm not abusing anybody... |
|
so you can just stop your hypocritical nannying. I think you've made it your full time job around here.
|
Balderdash
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #93 |
107. Until you asswipes get off |
|
the kids and start going after the politicians, damn straight I'm making it a crusade. I've spent too many years fighting the right and their nastiness to see my party devolve into fucking freepers. There is NO way to make going after these kids right. Hopefully someday some of you will experience a little Karma. Couldn't happen to a nicer bunch, IMHO of course.
|
Virginia Dare
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #107 |
Balderdash
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #108 |
109. I've tried talking to you a couple |
|
of times now and see that it's a clear waste of time. I lose my temper and you sink even further into whatever that nasty place is that allows you to think it's ok to use children and not even for politics but just to make fun of them and then say it's for politics sake. I could care less what pictures you post that are supposed to represent me, they don't reflect on me, they reflect on you.
|
Virginia Dare
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #109 |
110. No, you've tried lecturing me a few times.. |
|
and I challenge you to find a post where I've done anything you've accused me of. I've seen many of your posts telling people to stop talking about it, yet you continually talk about it.
|
Vinca
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:01 AM
Response to Original message |
35. I'm afraid since the young parents-to-be have been put out front and center |
|
as props to reinforce Palin's far right, no-abortion-for-any-reason stance, they're fair game.
|
Balderdash
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #35 |
48. Everyones families have been front and center... |
|
Obama said to leave the families out of it. So far I haven't heard Bristol say a freaking word about anything political.
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #48 |
|
Edited on Thu Sep-04-08 11:10 AM by redqueen
I give up.
|
jonnyblitz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:17 AM
Response to Original message |
56. k&r. I COMPLETELY agree. GD:P has been completely |
|
CRINGE-worthy since Palin was picked as the VP! There has been plenty of VALID criticism over her politics but this going after her kids for IRRELEVANT crap is fucking FREEPER-ESQUE.
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #56 |
73. We're on the exact same wavelength on this one! |
QueenOfCalifornia
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:18 AM
Response to Original message |
57. You are such a bitch.... |
|
Just kidding! You know (I hope) I always look for your posts... I agree with you - except I have one thing to say - those kids should NOT get married just to save Mommies face.
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #57 |
60. Yeah they shouldn't... but they will... |
|
they don't have enough experience to know better... and truly it's in their immediate best interests to do so. The whole situation is just sad.
Not NEARLY as sad as all the teenagers who are living in POVERTY and who ALSO have to deal with having a child so early in life... but still. At least Palin is willing to force them to have those kids too! Cause we don't have enough teen moms!
:hi:
|
ShortnFiery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #60 |
62. No worries, there will always be plenty of "well intentioned" people such as yourself who |
|
will gently remind us to focus on more pertinent issues. ;)
|
QueenOfCalifornia
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #60 |
|
a close call when it comes to making decisions for women and their bodies.
:hi:
|
confused08
(33 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:25 AM
Response to Original message |
61. I couldn't agree more |
|
and honestly, that is why I think that there is a huge difference between making comments about Cindy McCain, Todd Palin, Michelle Obama, or Jill Biden and making comments about the McCain, Palin, Obama or Biden children. I think this is applicable even when some of those children (like in the case of McCain and Biden) are adults. There is arguably an exception to this since Beau Biden is an elected official but I don't see the relevancy of that fact to the election at hand so I think even he should be protected from scorn.
I agree with Obama that overall the families should be left out of it, but i think this is even more applicable to children than spouses.
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #61 |
64. True... even more applicable to children... and even though they're teens... |
|
I remember what I was like at that age. Mabye I was just a weirdo, but I remember feeling pretty emotionally vulnerable, still.
|
cwydro
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:31 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Taking cheap shots at teenagers is low class; that is what is trashy.
|
olkaz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:32 AM
Response to Original message |
69. Levi is an adult. /tiniest violin |
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #69 |
71. Sorry... like I said upthread... I thought after seeing Palin act like such a bully |
|
that maybe DU's "bully squad" would take a short break at least. ;)
|
Virginia Dare
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #71 |
79. No, we've got the bully pulpit and we're using it....n/t |
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #79 |
82. Sarah's bully act is turning off independents and moderates. (nt) |
|
Edited on Thu Sep-04-08 11:51 AM by redqueen
|
Virginia Dare
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #82 |
85. So what? None of us here are running for V.P....n/t |
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #85 |
87. Um...DUH! Like I already said more than once - I'm SO fucking sorry for saying jack SHIT about that |
|
meanspirited rush-limbaugh-like nasty fucking thread!
Jesus.
Forgive the fuck out of me for thinking we'd see Sarah acting that way and NOT want to do our own imitation of the sarcasm mockery and hate schtick.
So done with this thread.
|
Virginia Dare
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #87 |
91. C'mon we're all on the same side!.. |
|
it's just not all of us are on the same page.
|
greguganus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #87 |
104. I'm glad you are done with this thread! Now I can take you off ignore! |
confused08
(33 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #82 |
|
has there been any statistics out on it? I can't tell whether to laugh at the woman or fear her... there seems to be almost no post-Palin polls out there that arent either mobbed by our side or by the "freepers"... I think we should find a poll which checks the views of moderate mainstream america on the pick
|
Occam Bandage
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 12:36 PM
Response to Original message |
96. Because they're petty, vile jackasses. |
|
Edited on Thu Sep-04-08 12:37 PM by Occam Bandage
And I don't mean Bristol and Levi.
|
madrchsod
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message |
100. ?........ i feel sorry for them |
|
Edited on Thu Sep-04-08 12:41 PM by madrchsod
the "mother" throws the kids to the wolves to save her sorry fucking ass.
i thought mothers protected their children but i guess that does`t apply to her....
|
melody
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 12:53 PM
Response to Original message |
105. I've emailed this to RQ privately but am posting it here for everyone else |
|
Edited on Thu Sep-04-08 12:54 PM by melody
I really stepped over the line today with a few of you and I'd like to apologize. As I said to RQ via email, I've been awake now for 72 hours with only a couple of hours of sleep due to waiting with my long-time neighbor for word on her son who is missing in Iraq. I took care of Cliff when he was a child and have known him since the day he came home from the hospital.
None of that makes up for my being an ass. I still hold all the opinions I expressed. I merely wish I had expressed them in a more appropriate fashion. My apologies especially to RedQueen.
If you pray, I'd appreciate your keeping Cliff, Jenny and their family in your thoughts.
Thanks,
melody
|
blue_onyx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 12:55 PM
Response to Original message |
106. I agree they shouldn't be attacked |
|
I do think referencing them when talking about Palin's positions on abortion and sex education is ok though. The fact that Palin's daughter was allowed to make the choice to have the child but Palin doesn't feel other women should be allowed to have that same choice is relevant to the election. Bristol and Levi shouldn't be attacked personally for their choices but unfortunately for them, Palin chose to run for VP even though her family was going through some issues.
|
intaglio
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 03:41 PM
Response to Original message |
112. Perhaps one reason is because the GOP are using them |
|
for the opposite reason - as cutesy, cuddly, "Oh let's all worship the ideal Republican family,"
Unfortunately for the kids the only effective response is to highlight what a nauseating mess Palin has made of bringing up her children. Levi made clear on his website that he did NOT want to marry and there is no evidence that Bristol wanted to marry Levi; indeed it would be good to know at what point that engagement ring made it's first appearance.
Similarly it is clear that Sarah Palin is a liar and the Prima Facie evidence of that is the removal of Bristol from school because of "Mono"; not because the Palins wanted to keep Bristol away from Levi or later because Bristol was pregnant but the hoary old excuse of Mono. Mono or Mononucleosis sometimes called Glandular Fever and the "Kissing Disease" has been used for years to cover for indiscretions.
The shame of this whole thing is that it means picking on the kids because the kids have been used.
|
K8-EEE
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 08:22 PM
Response to Original message |
116. Because in his website he sounds like a total asshole. |
|
And a self-described fucking redneck.
|
nichomachus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 08:28 PM
Response to Original message |
117. It's not petty bullshit |
|
This is the bedrock of the GOP rhetoric since God knows when -- teenage abstinence, working mothers not supervising their kids, teen pregnancy, blah blah blah.
If Palin wants to make restrictive rules for our kids under the guide of family values, then we have a right to ask how that has worked out in her family
By their fruits you shall know them.
She's a fraud and a phony and Bristol and the First Redneck are Exhibit A.
|
mzmolly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 08:30 PM
Response to Original message |
118. I agree. Though I'm thankful I haven't seen much of this |
crimsonblue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 08:50 PM
Response to Original message |
119. You don't get to cherry pick the pimping of your children |
|
When you exploit your Down's baby and your military son, then we get to exploit your preggers daughter and her hick boyfriend.
|
mdavies013
(292 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-05-08 12:18 AM
Response to Original message |
120. THIS IS A DISTRACTION...I THINK MANUFACTURED BY KARL ROVE |
|
I do not see any mainstream democrats going after them. Obama said that these are personal issues within the family and urged supporters to back off. I think it is designed to rile the anti-abortion crowd. The McSame campaign is cashing in on this and trying to outlife themselves.
|
kurth_
(395 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-05-08 12:20 AM
Response to Original message |
121. Leave the kids out of it |
|
Not their fault their mother is such a nasty woman.
|
mokawanis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-05-08 12:35 AM
Response to Original message |
122. I'm tired of the threads AND the complaints about them |
|
I'm getting damn tired of both. People say what they want to say, and a handful of posts on DU making fun of Palin's kids isn't going to impact the election.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:49 PM
Response to Original message |