THE CRIME VS. THE COVER-UP.... Looking back, Sarah Palin would have been so much better off if she'd acknowledged the real reasons she fired former Alaskan Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan -- he didn't get rid of her former brother-in-law when she wanted him to. Indeed, if she had conceded what she'd done and why, Palin might have even been able to spin this into a positive.
It's the dishonesty, though, that continues to make this a more serious problem.
<...>
I'm sure Palin and the McCain campaign would love for this story to go away, but the longer she sticks to a bogus story, the more it undermines her credibility. The crime, in this case, is bad, but the cover-up is worse.
Keep in mind, Palin has already had to backpedal when her public claims couldn't withstand scrutiny. She initially said her administration didn't pressure Monegan to fire her former brother-in-law.
That turned out to be false. She said she had disagreed with Monegan over alcohol-abuse issues in rural Alaska.
That turned out to be false (a couple of weeks before firing Monegan, Palin praised his work on alcohol-abuse issues in rural Alaska and offered to make him director of the state's Alcohol Beverage Control Board).
<...>
Josh Marshall had a terrific item over the weekend, summarizing the scandal. He
concluded: "We rely on elected officials not to use the power of their office to pursue personal agendas or vendettas. It's called an abuse of power.... The available evidence now suggests that she 1) tried to have an ex-relative fired from his job for personal reasons, something that was clearly inappropriate, and perhaps illegal, though possibly understandable in human terms, 2) fired a state official for not himself acting inappropriately by firing the relative, 3) lied to the public about what happened and 4) continues to lie about what happened. "
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
