nichomachus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:24 PM
Original message |
No Questions! Campaign says Palin won't answer any questions -- just read speeches from now on |
|
Edited on Thu Sep-04-08 05:25 PM by nichomachus
http://www.time-blog.com/swampland/2008/09/no_questions_please_were.htmlAccording to Nicole Wallace of the McCain campaign, the American people don't care whether Sarah Palin can answer specific questions about foreign and domestic policy. According to Wallace -- in an appearance I did with her this morning on Joe Scarborough's show -- the American people will learn all they need to know (and all they deserve to know) from Palin's scripted speeches and choreographed appearances on the campaign trail and in campaign ads.So, you can just stuff it, peasants.
|
marylanddem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:24 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Good lord. Have we really come to this? |
Born_A_Truman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:25 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Does that mean she won't debate Biden? |
nichomachus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. If you were her, would you? |
Born_A_Truman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
But then I am also smart enough to know I am not qualified to be VP.
|
stolivodka
(411 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
9. That's what I want to know! |
|
Does that mean that the fake war hero is also trying to chicken out of debates?
|
WinkyDink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:28 PM
Original message |
Her excuse will be interesting. Maybe that's the point of all the "liberal Obama media" |
|
slanders. Set up a Potemkin reason for not participating in the debate.
|
blondeatlast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:27 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Will she debate? I honestly bet she won't; she can't even face "Good Morning, America." |
|
How the hell can she take on the likes of Joe Biden?
Wow. I'm almost speechless.
|
BlueIdaho
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:27 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Do they really think folks will swallow this horse shit? Will Caribou Barbi ever have to answer questions from the press - ever? Could it be she is terrified? Is she the dog that caught the car?
|
Kerrytravelers
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:27 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Well, color me surprised. |
Kerrytravelers
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:27 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Well, color me surprised. |
PA Democrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:27 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Palin should be SLAMMED for this. |
Franks Wild Years
(687 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:27 PM
Response to Original message |
|
An exceedingly weak, cowardly individual.
|
City Lights
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:28 PM
Response to Original message |
|
:eyes:
Mr. Tough Guy and his Trophy Sidekick are pathetically inept and unprepared.
Two wimps in a pod.
|
LSparkle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:28 PM
Response to Original message |
12. We MUST make an issue of this ... What is she AFRAID of??? |
|
What are her HANDLERS afraid of? Is she her own woman (the strong, rifle-wielding, moose-skinning salt-of-the-earth ceiling-shatterer) or just CARIBOU BARBIE (as we've all been suspecting)?
Put Obama and Biden out (even together) in town hall settings to such an extent that it SCREAMS transparency and openness, and run ads that show poor little Sarah in a bunker in an "undisclosed location" a la DICK CHENEY.
DO WE WANT A SECRETIVE, UNACCOUNTABLE VEEP AGAIN????
|
MrModerate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:28 PM
Response to Original message |
13. The McCain campaign is self-destructing . . . |
|
Breaks my frakkin' heart.
|
Bucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:28 PM
Response to Original message |
14. How... Reaganesque.... |
|
At least they didn't put Dubya in a bubble until he fucked up a few times.
|
MikeE
(637 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:28 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Just wow. I guess she wasn't quick enough, even with all the coaching she was receiving, to be prepared, either that, or they know the dirt that is coming.
|
fishwax
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:28 PM
Response to Original message |
16. boy, that sounds very desperate |
|
Nicole Wallace sounded quite desperate to somehow disparage the suggestion that a VP should actually be able to answer unscripted questions.
|
K8-EEE
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:29 PM
Original message |
|
If they think they can get away with that they're nuts.
She's doing plenty of whining about the press too, didn't she tell Hillary NOT to whine? Just do BETTER? Like....HIDE??
|
Cattledog
(695 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:29 PM
Response to Original message |
17. The interest she's generated |
|
will soon fade away. I guess the Pitbull's been neutered.
|
high density
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:29 PM
Response to Original message |
18. So in other words she knows absolutely nothing about anything |
|
They're making it a wee bit too obvious.
|
Mojambo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:29 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Is it possible that even this lap dog press will let this go?
|
Epiphany4z
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:30 PM
Response to Original message |
|
but we could be her employers..we dam well better have our Questions answered...there should be a letter to editor in every paper..this is just sick.
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:30 PM
Response to Original message |
21. Sigh. She did not say that Palin won't answer any questions -- let's not |
|
Edited on Thu Sep-04-08 05:35 PM by gateley
spread this around. Read the transcript, not just somebody's interpretation of it.
She was discussing Palin's speech - that it was an introduction of Palin to the people. That the purpose of it was to get to know who she is, that the people weren't interested in the other stuff.
I think the conversation was about the speech only -- I don't believe she was indicating that Palin won't answer questions in the future.
The campaign knows they'd be mincemeat if they tried that approach.
|
nichomachus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
44. Then, why is she ducking the Sunday talk shows? |
|
You'd think that an unknown candidate, new to the campaign, would be trotted around to be on all the shows to get the exposure that she's going to need about two months from now.
But, she's ducking the shows. How strange!
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #44 |
51. If they really attempt this, it'll backfire. It would have to, don't you think? nt |
Duke Newcombe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #44 |
71. Because they're prepping her...like a kid cramming for the finals... |
|
Unfortunately for her, it will soon be revealed that her "knowledge" and "experience" is a mile wide and an inch deep.
Duke
|
DeschutesRiver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
|
I watched the segment on Morning Joe. She absolutely said, several times in response to the Times guy (and in the course of the general conversation as well), that it was not important for Sarah to answer any media questions, that the only questions she'd take would be from the american public. She ended on that note as well, emphatically, when the Times guy again mentioned questions to be answered, "not from the media."
I don't know what other program she may have appeared on, and spoken differently. The one I am referring to was this morning. It was something else.
|
Ichingcarpenter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:30 PM
Response to Original message |
22. Pat Buchannan said this earlier long before the memo came out |
|
Said she doesn't need to answer any questions and Tweety slammed him so bad and said they will lose the election if they do that.
|
Epiphany4z
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
34. I knew pat was being to pushy |
|
on that point I knew something was up
|
Ichingcarpenter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #34 |
49. I thought it was odd too. He had gotten the memo and was pushing it |
|
Tweety destroyed the argument so much that Pat really didn't have a good rational answer.
So I think this story is true.
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
46. What the hell? Why would Pat say something so mind-bogglingly stupid? |
|
Edited on Thu Sep-04-08 05:46 PM by redqueen
Oh... wait...
Yeah, nevermind.
:P
|
Marsala
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:30 PM
Response to Original message |
|
The media will spend the next two months blabbing about how Palin is hiding from them like Dick Cheney in his bunker. McCain himself isn't exactly going to be Mr. Available himself, either.
Meanwhile, Obama goes on Bill O'Reilly. Palin and McCain will be unwilling to face the harsh interrogation of Larry King.
|
TexasObserver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:31 PM
Response to Original message |
25. "GOP Spokesmodel Sarah Palin" |
|
Candidates have to answer media questions.
|
Brundle_Fly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:31 PM
Response to Original message |
26. She'll Answer Questions... of course she will |
|
FAUX NEWS WILL HAVE THE STORY
|
PA Democrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:31 PM
Response to Original message |
27. I am furious. This token candidate is setting the woman's movement back by 30 years by demanding |
|
a different set of rules. And this is the wimp who was ready to take credit for Hillary's groundbreaking efforts? Screw her.
|
seabeyond
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
29. don't be sexist. treat me special and gentle.... i mean wtf n/t |
|
Edited on Thu Sep-04-08 05:33 PM by seabeyond
|
yy4me
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:32 PM
Response to Original message |
28. Come on folks, do they think we are dumb? This is absurd and |
|
I hope the media is paying some attention here. Our future is at stake and she doesn't want to talk about it? Sounds like a petulant, spoiled, dictated-to wacko. Enough already. There should be a law requiring a certain amount of public unscripted exposure. When this is all said and done, If mcSame wins then dies, we are in deeper doodo than anyone could guess. Another puppet like ****.
|
AspenRose
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:34 PM
Response to Original message |
30. Eliza Doolittle needs to spend all her time practicing for the debate |
|
So she doesn't have time for questions with the media....
|
AZBlue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:34 PM
Response to Original message |
31. Because she's so good at giving speeches? |
Bobbie Jo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:34 PM
Response to Original message |
32. The Mannequin Candidate |
|
So...they just prop her up and pull her string?
|
PA Democrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
36. Talking Barbie. No brain necessary. |
Bake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:34 PM
Response to Original message |
33. If she won't face reporters -- FACE THE VOTERS -- then don't cover her scripted events either! |
|
Is Camp McCain just TRYING to piss off the press? What idiots.
Bake
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:35 PM
Response to Original message |
35. Are they serious? Is that from The Onion? |
butterfly77
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:36 PM
Response to Original message |
37. These people really do have some damn nerve... |
|
they have been running around the Republicons and the media for months complaining about how we don't know enough about Obama and he has done everything they have harped on answered every question and they think this BITCH is going to get away with this. Yeah, I said it..
|
Rectangle
(437 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:36 PM
Response to Original message |
38. Our leaders (Obama,Biden) need to call them on this |
|
directly! They need to get bare-knucked with McCain/Palin. Give her, (and him) the straight talk express "You are cowards, put up, or shut up, You understand?" :nuke: :grr:
|
BeyondGeography
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:37 PM
Response to Original message |
39. Won't work; McCain will be worn down by questions about this until he cracks |
|
It's so outrageous, even the whores won't go along with it.
|
Bread and Circus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:37 PM
Response to Original message |
40. McCain Camp: "We didn't vet her, we don't want the American people to either" |
PA Democrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #40 |
Marnieworld
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:40 PM
Response to Original message |
41. And the queen requests that no one make eye contact as well |
|
This is ridiculous. They have actually found someone worse than Bush. She's up to the job but cant handle an interview? Wow. Just wow. Nothing pleases the media more than denying access. :sarcasm: They'll just start saying whatever they want if she won't refute them.
|
Kurt_and_Hunter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:41 PM
Response to Original message |
42. HA! I thought this was going to be a joke thread. What a world. |
krkaufman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:41 PM
Response to Original message |
43. Yep, I saw that on this morning's MSNBC Morning Joe program. |
|
She was unbelievably rude to the guy from Time (author of the above), and he came back with some snark later. I think Nicole Wallace may have raised the ire of the media a bit.
|
ErinBerin84
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #43 |
48. oooh, did you see Jay Carney on MSNBC later today |
|
talking about how McCain became "invasion of the body snatchers" (seriously) during his interview recently? He was talking to Brokaw. It should be on youtube, if you missed it.
|
krkaufman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #48 |
57. Ah, Carney... that's his name. |
|
No, I haven't seen that vid, yet, so thanks for the tip.
I'm not sure that picking a fight with Time magazine was the best move for McCain.
|
Schema Thing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:46 PM
Response to Original message |
47. I like the way Joe Scab jumped in there for the press. Good work journalist Joe. |
Kaylee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 05:51 PM
Response to Original message |
50. They've got to be kidding! |
|
Who the hell do they think they are?
|
DeschutesRiver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 06:03 PM
Response to Original message |
52. I watched that on Morning Joe; bitched on every post I could about it |
|
Nicole was a piece of work - laughed each time as she dismissed the idea that Sarah would be answerin question from "the media". From the american public? Oh sure, but not from media.
Said it multiple time; made sure she got it in one more time, ending the set with yet another crack about how Sarah will NOT be answering, if it it the media asking. I never figured out why she kept laughing like it was ridiculous to even suggest that it would be important to answer media questions, when it is the voter's opinions only that count.
How wierd is that? Like americans should stay home from work to wait for Sarah to have a q & a session some day? Or do a single rushed whistle stop in their town? I think we like the press doing its job for us, them and the whole nation; so we can dig further if we need, or just get some help figuring out the issues raised, so we can make better decisions.
|
BumRushDaShow
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 06:05 PM
Response to Original message |
53. The repukes are mocking the entire U.S. electoral process. n/t |
senseandsensibility
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 06:05 PM
Response to Original message |
54. Is the media going to talk about this? |
terrya
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 06:06 PM
Response to Original message |
55. I guess that means she won't be in the debate with Biden, |
|
Since there will be questions.
Hell, that will REALLY be a snap for Biden. :-)
|
workinclasszero
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 06:06 PM
Response to Original message |
56. Aww little Caribou Barbie is scared to show the people |
|
what a reich wing lying POS she really is!
|
aint_no_life_nowhere
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 06:15 PM
Response to Original message |
58. Achtung! Achtung! You vill ask no qvestions und you vill enchoy it! |
bigwillq
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 06:17 PM
Response to Original message |
|
How the hell is she going to go head-to-head with Biden, and WORLD LEADERS! :shrug: :mad:
|
Botany
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 06:18 PM
Response to Original message |
60. Caribou Barbie is afraid? |
opihimoimoi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 06:18 PM
Response to Original message |
61. WHAT ARE THEY HIDING??????? This is Suicidal |
|
Parsing on words ain't gonna do it....
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 06:22 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
moondust
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 06:26 PM
Response to Original message |
63. A sure sign of ignorance and/or incompetence. |
|
Same as Bush's heavily scripted, exclusive campaign rallies and his supersecret Presidency. Joe Sixpack might humiliate them in a spontaneous exchange, not to mention what the press might do. Neither Bush nor Palin has the intellect to hold high office, but they're going to do everything they can to hide that fact.
|
Willo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 06:30 PM
Response to Original message |
64. I don't think we should make a big deal of it |
|
Edited on Thu Sep-04-08 06:30 PM by WIllo
McCain's campaign told a Times Reporter this morning that Palin wasn't going to be answering questions of the media and blew them off as unimportant.
If we make a big deal about Palin not doing the debate, she will look good for just showing up.
IMO, I think it's better to let their people and the media talk and make excuses for her.
If she does not show you can be sure it will be a family (baby) emergency, of which it will be "Who would not understand and do the same in this situation.
She must show up, AND if she doesn't we have to trust the thinking of those would have watched that debate.
|
Bubbha Jo
(846 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 06:32 PM
Response to Original message |
65. Why she won't answer them will become more important |
|
than what she would actually say. Bad move.
|
GoesTo11
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 06:37 PM
Response to Original message |
67. Don't worry, the press won't stand for this! |
|
They'll bend over for it.
|
AzDar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 06:39 PM
Response to Original message |
68. How fucking Cheney-esque. |
AgadorSparticus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 06:52 PM
Response to Original message |
69. well.....doesn't this speak volumes! Obama's camp will be foolish to let som'n this juicy get away |
|
take some of their buzz away. prime opportunity. but then again, democrats seem to be experts on letting opportunities get away....
|
Monk06
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 07:01 PM
Response to Original message |
70. I said it before. This is a fundy/neo con coup in the GOP. Palin will be the president in all but |
|
name. Mc Cain will be a potted plant that Palin will water once in a while if she remembers to.
|
aint_no_life_nowhere
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 07:07 PM
Response to Original message |
72. Bring on the tons of ads against her |
|
I hope Move On runs short ads addressing each of her scandals and weirdities. For example, I'd like to see a Move On ad showing her addressing the 2008 AIP convention with her words "keep up the good work", followed by quotes by past AIP leaders who describe how they hate the United States.
If she won't get out there and answer these allegations or submit to a long interview in which specific questions are asked, rebuttals by campaign spokespeople and surrogates won't work. She has to address these things herself or they remain unrebutted.
|
Arrowhead2k1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 07:09 PM
Response to Original message |
73. This is actually a smart strategy for the McCain camp because. |
|
She's actually as dumb as a fucking door knob unscripted. Good call...
|
Arkansas Granny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 07:14 PM
Response to Original message |
74. They need to edit that statement to read "the Republican voters don't care |
|
whether Sarah Palin can answer specific questions about foreign and domestic policy".
|
JackBeck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 07:15 PM
Response to Original message |
75. Another McCain talking point goes down. |
|
Is he still going to accuse Obama of merely being a candidate that just makes speeches?
|
Mad_Dem_X
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 07:15 PM
Response to Original message |
76. Can't wait for the debate! |
nichomachus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #76 |
|
Q. Mr. Biden, are you comfortable with the fact that Barack Osama, I mean Obama, and his wife are terrorists.
Q. Governor Palin, do you think Jesus loves puppy dogs as much as he does pussycats.
Q. Mr. Biden, do you think people should be allowed to marry animals.
Q. Governor Palin, what's your favorite color and why.
|
Tutankhamun
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 08:07 PM
Response to Original message |
77. The word "Palin" is ancient Sanskrit for "cartoon". |
AmericanUnity
(342 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 08:09 PM
Response to Original message |
78. George Bush in high heels. All image, little factual substance. All speeches |
nichomachus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #78 |
aint_no_life_nowhere
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 08:24 PM
Response to Original message |
81. Now it has become the "no talk" express |
Raine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-04-08 08:30 PM
Response to Original message |
82. She's incapable and unknowledgable |
|
of answering questions, so now she doesn't have to. :-(
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 14th 2024, 09:23 AM
Response to Original message |