Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Guardian: Ruthless, vindictive, authoritarian. But she loves Jesus.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 09:51 AM
Original message
Guardian: Ruthless, vindictive, authoritarian. But she loves Jesus.
Edited on Sat Sep-06-08 10:07 AM by seafan
'This person loves Jesus'

Ed Pilkington in Wasilla, Alaska
September 6, 2008

Guardian



Sarah Palin receives a nomination for governor at the Republican National Convention. Photograph: Tannen Maury/EPA


.....

In Palin's case, the improbable journey began here: a sprawling wooden compound that looks like a cross between an oversized McDonald's and a prison complex. It occupies a patch of barren ground on the edge of Wasilla, the tiny town in Alaska in which she spent her childhood and cut her political teeth. Above the entrance a banner announces that this is the home of the Wasilla Assembly of God, motto: "To know Him, and to make Him known!"

It was here Palin was baptised, or "saved", as she describes it, and later had her children baptised. It was here she was inducted into the peculiar rituals of her fundamentalist faith - the charismatic preaching, the laying on of hands, the tears and cries of joy of the Pentecostal church. "I grew up in the Wasilla Assembly of God," she once said. "Nothing freaks me out about the worship service."

.....

Pastor Ed, as his flock calls him, moved to Wasilla in 1999 - three years after the town elected Palin as its mayor. What struck him the first time they met, he has said, was that in her eyes religion came first, politics second. He thought to himself: "This person loves Jesus. That's the bottom line. She loves Jesus with everything she has. She is a disciple of the Lord Jesus Christ before she is the mayor. Sarah Palin is the real deal."
Pastor Ed's language may be colourful. But he has put his finger on a central truth about the woman who in two months' time could become the next vice-president of the US. From her earliest days at the bottom of the political ladder in minuscule Wasilla, through to her sudden rise this week into international stardom, she has always been on a mission.

Her trajectory has run in parallel with that of her party. Her career took off precisely at the moment when the Christian right seized control of the Republican movement, casting out the fiscal conservatives who had traditionally held sway with their focus on such worldly matters as low taxes and small government.

The shift in the party's focus from mammon to God is illustrated perfectly in Palin's successful campaign to become mayor in 1996. All previous elections had revolved around such existential questions as how to improve the pavements and get litter off the streets. She ignored all that, campaigning instead against abortion and gun control and casting aspersions on her (Republican) opponent about his infrequent attendance of church.

Victoria Naegele was editor of the local paper, The Frontiersman, at the time and can recall the shock of the Palin revolution. "I remember thinking 'Wow! Are religious issues really germane to the job of being mayor of a town of just 5,000 people?'"

Naegele remembers vividly too a second shockwave that came swiftly after Palin's election. Instead of easing her way into the role, she went in with guns blazing, demanding that six of the department heads of the council - none of them political appointments, several with many years' service - submit their resignations. When Naegele protested through the editorial columns of the paper at what she saw as the new mayor's heavy-handed style, she felt the heat. "It was a difficult time. I was lambasted as a liberal, when in fact I am a Christian conservative Republican, just like Sarah Palin."



This poignant and very timely article goes on to describe the single-minded, harsh vindictiveness that Palin displays in her frequent clashes with those who do not agree with her views.



Then, in an incident that is fast turning into the stuff of political legend, Palin was revealed earlier this week to have attempted to censor Wasilla's library. The idea is almost laughable when you see the library itself. Its small collection of books includes a prominent section on hunting and fishing, and no visible copies of Lady Chatterley's Lover. Yet in 1996, after parents complained about a book their child had taken home, Palin took umbrage. Frustratingly, no one can remember the volume concerned. What we do know is that Palin turned on the then librarian, Mary Ellen Emmons, asking her in a council meeting what she would do if she were told by the mayor to remove certain books from the collection.

Local resident Anne Kilkenny was in the public gallery and heard the librarian's reaction: "She sucked in her breath, and replied that the books in the library were all acquired in accordance with professional criteria and she would resist completely."

Palin has since claimed her question was purely rhetorical. That is not how Naegele and Kilkenny perceived it at the time. A few weeks later, Palin sent Emmons a letter terminating her employment. "People in the town rose up in anger," Kilkenny recalls. "The library is an important institution in our city, as there's not a lot else to do here in the winter but sit by the fire with a good book. There was real public pressure, and Sarah was forced to rescind the letter."

Emmons survived. Others were less fortunate. The museum director, city planner and public works director all quit within months of Palin's ascendancy, and the police chief was sacked outright (he sued for wrongful dismissal but lost). Palin said the turnover was needed to clean out the "old boys' club". Others were not so sure.




Underlying all of this is the steady, stealthy encroachment into our government and daily lives by the crusade of Religious Right Fundamentalism, now embodied in the new face of Sarah Palin.




Again, she was utterly in tune with the trajectory of her party. By the end of the 1990s the Republican leadership had adopted a modus operandi that also combined religious zealotry with managerial ruthlessness. Yet this development was not without its detractors within the party. One of the loudest critics was the very man who has put Palin on the national stage: John McCain. Paradoxically, it was partly his disdain for the grip that TV preachers came to hold over the Republicans that earned him a reputation as a maverick.




In choosing this extremist religious fundamentalist as his running mate, John McCain has exponentially endangered this county's future, both on the international stage and here at home. John McCain has, in recent years, had a love-hate relationship with the Religious Right. Now, if not stopped, the crusade of the Religious Right and its army of extremists has set about to destroy John McCain, our government and our way of life.



Since then, Palin has travelled a huge distance in her journey towards the White House. Two years ago she became Alaska's first female governor, with some of the most valuable natural resources in the US under her control. Stylistically, she's become much more sophisticated. But under the surface, the way of operating has changed little.

The religious mission is still front and centre of her politics. She opposes abortion in all cases other than those in which the mother would die if she were to give birth. She is a vocal opponent of gay marriage, and advocate of the teaching of anti-evolutionary creationism, or "intelligent design", in schools.

Her religious beliefs extend to a conviction that the Iraq war is God's will. When she returned to Wasilla in June to pray with her old congregation, she said of the troops being posted to Iraq, including her own son, Track: "Our national leaders are sending them out on a task from God. We have to pray there is a plan and that it's God's plan."

Most poignantly, she will not countenance sex education for teenagers, preferring instead to preach that abstinence is the only complete protection against pregnancy or venereal disease. It would be a cheap shot to suggest that this week's bombshell revelation that her 17-year-old daughter, Bristol, is herself pregnant was Palin's comeuppance.

But it would not be unfair to point out that Alaska has the highest per capita incidence of chlamydia in the country, and that the rate of teenage pregnancies across the US, including within her state, has just risen for the first time in 14 years - a trend many blame on George Bush's preferment of abstinence-only education. "It's frustrating we aren't doing more to inform our children," said Brittany Goodnight of the Alaska branch of Planned Parenthood.




If the religious flame still burns bright, so too does the ruthless determination. In an echo of what happened to the librarian and police chief in Wasilla all those years ago, Palin is embroiled in a full-scale investigation by the Alaskan state legislature into allegations that she sacked the safety commissioner because he in turn refused to act against a police officer whom Palin wanted dismissed.

The officer, Mike Wooten, was the governor's former brother-in-law, who had been through an acrimonious divorce from her sister. Palin, her husband, Todd, and several of her aides tried to convince the commissioner, Walter Monegan, to fire Wooten, but he refused.

The casualties scattered along Palin's path continue to mount. Lyda Green, a neighbour of Palin's in Wasilla, has just become the latest. She is stepping down as a state senator after 14 years.

Green is the leader of the Republicans in the Alaskan senate and an old-style fiscal conservative. She voted against several of the governor's most important initiatives over the past two years, including a move to increase taxes on the big oil and gas companies. Green was surprised by the reprisals that followed. "I found early on that if you disagreed with her it was not taken as a disagreement with policy, but a personal disagreement."

First came the embarrassment of a radio interview between Palin and a local rightwing shock-jock in which the interviewer called Green a bitch and a cancer within the party. Palin's response on air? She laughed.

"She knew I'm a cancer survivor - she sent me flowers," Green says. "That was a very lacklustre moment."

Then Palin arranged for a friend to stand this summer against Green in the Republican party's selection process for her own senate seat. Green decided to stand down rather than go through a primary battle she was sure would be ugly. "There came a point when I thought it was no longer worth it," says Green. "I didn't need, in a community as small as this, to stand in the face of this very popular governor." Then she adds: "But it's not a way to run a government."

That's a pertinent observation, I suggest, in the light of the next destination Sarah Palin hopes to reach in her improbable journey. "It is pertinent," Green replies.




The face of Sarah Palin is the face of right wing fundamentalist religious zealotry. We are teetering on the brink of allowing this ideology to seize our government in its totality.

That chilling outcome foretells a catastrophic threat to our future if we do not act.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. Palin is religiously insane


the religiously insane are dangerous
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crazylikafox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. Like McCain, she is temperamentally unfit to be President...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misskittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. Now tell me that stage isn't a cross.
I keep beating this dead horse, but really, here's photographic proof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. A kick for more eyes. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northamericancitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. k&r I don't want her to become an other toxic southern neighbor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chat_noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. photos of their Colorado Springs/Bible town rally
sorry, a FReeper posted them

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2076340/posts


See any non-white supporters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'm not religious at all, Sarah, but I do know Jesus would find you appalling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. They use Jesus to act like arrogant, greedy
a$$holes. The reality is they worship at the altar of Greed, Oil, and Pollution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. if Gov. Palin is what they say she is, well then, she obviously does not love
Jesus. Jesus was about helping the less fortunate and being kind.

Not for being vindictive for no reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hansel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
10. Really, then why does she represent him so poorly? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. The sin of Satan (Lucifer) ... the making of the Devil ...
... at least according to one of the myths was that Lucifer disobeyed God's command to love His Creation and Humankind. Lucifer protested by claiming that he loved only God. Lucifer, for his disobedience, was then condemned to be out of God's sight ... deprived of the 'only love' Lucifer had. Thus, Hell is described as the absence of God ... deprived of the Presence of God.

This, of course, is the 'sin' of those who proclaim their "love" of God/Jesus/Allah but hate God's children. I don't know of any reputable theologian in the Abrahamic tradition that would condone such an interpretation of the Scriptures.

In a sense, then, these are (literally) "Followers of Satan/Lucifer."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. whoah!

That's one way of thinking of it.

I've wondered how they could act so evilly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
12. Palin, the animal killer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
13. I think people should be able to believe whatever they want
If they want to worship an onion, for example, that's fine by me. I believe in live and let live.

But I don't think someone like Palin should be able to come within 1,000 miles of the levers of government, not if they let religion guide their every action and motivation and believe they are on a religious mission.

From the article: "She is a disciple of the Lord Jesus Christ before she is the mayor. Sarah Palin is the real deal." ... "The religious mission is still front and centre of her politics."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
15. Sarah Palin: Another Phyllis Schlafly, Anita Bryant, Ann Coulter
Edited on Sat Sep-06-08 09:08 PM by seafan
A woman to make enlightened voters shudder

By Joan Smith
Sunday, 7 September 2008




In the heady atmosphere of last week's Republican convention – electrified by Sarah Palin's barnstorming speech as the vice-presidential candidate – a curious fact seems to have been overlooked. On paper, the new darling of Christian conservatives ticks all the right boxes as only a media-taunting, oil-drilling, gun-toting, abortion-hating, creationist mother of five could. Equally at home posing for photographs with her children and dead animals, she sends out an irresistible mating call to evangelical voters who suspect that John McCain is secretly too secular for their taste.

.....

Last week, the Democratic candidate, Barack Obama, responded to the news that Palin's 17-year-old daughter was pregnant with an instruction to his supporters that the subject is off-limits, and a reminder that his own mother was only 18 when he was born.
Ms Palin insisted it was a private matter, although she was quite happy to parade her children, including the pregnant Bristol and her deeply uncomfortable boyfriend, at the convention in Minneapolis-St Paul.

Both candidates got it wrong: Palin, by exposing a troubled teenager to the world's media; and Obama, for failing to raise a legitimate and important issue.
He should have said that while the girl is entitled to privacy, it is clearly better in principle for young adults to finish their education and make decisions about marriage and children without the pressure of a teenage pregnancy; he should also have pointed out that Palin opposes any form of sex education that isn't "abstinence-based".


In practice, this means giving teenagers as little practical information as possible, while telling them not to have sex before marriage.
It it doesn't work – neither for Bristol Palin, nor for the other 750,000 teenage girls who get pregnant in the US each year at a cost of $9.1bn (£5.2bn) in public funding.

Last year, the British Medical Journal listed abstinence-based sex education programmes under the unequivocal heading "popular interventions that do not work"; an analysis of five such programmes showed, at best, no effects on teenage pregnancy rates and "at worst, an increase in the number of pregnancies in the partners of young male participants".
The United States has one of the highest rates of teenage pregnancy in the developed world, even worse than the UK, which is itself frequently criticised for having the worst record in Europe. Between 2000 and 2005, there were 44 births for every 1,000 women aged 15 to 19 in the US, compared with 27 per 1,000 in Britain.

More than 80 per cent of births to American teenagers are unintended, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and they are powerful evidence in favour of broadly based sex education linked to programmes that provide contraceptive devices.

McCain has chosen a running mate who doesn't want that, even though her own family provides living proof of the failure of one of the main planks of her brand of social conservatism.
As if that were not bad enough, she is implacably opposed to abortion, even if it's the result of incest or rape. She wants to overturn the landmark legal decision Roe vs Wade, which legalised abortion in the US, even though in the past McCain has admitted that it would immediately lead to thousands of back-street abortions.

.....




Obama must pick up this issue of teen pregnancy and highlight Palin's opposition to any form of sex education other than abstinence. He must frame this as such. People understand this and need to hear what Palin's extremist, narrow views are. Palin has now opened this door.



More from the article:


Forget her populist oratory and feisty delivery: this is an old-fashioned, right-wing woman who has nothing to offer either secular Republicans or the disillusioned supporters of Hillary Clinton.

The former Miss Wasilla 1984 belongs firmly in the tradition of American arch-conservatives. These include Phyllis Schlafly, known for her opposition to feminism and the Equal Rights Amendment, and Anita Bryant – another former beauty queen, as it happens –, even if Palin has managed to persuade some over-excited columnists that having a job and five children is the pinnacle of modernity.
If McCain's calculation really was that his choice of a female running mate might tempt disillusioned Clinton voters away from the Democrats, it would have to count as one of the most insulting political gestures of the 21st century; women are not a tribe, so bowled over by a candidate who shares their gender that they will vote for her, regardless of her policies.

In democratic systems, politics often throws up women like Sarah Palin. They look and sound very different from the men around them – Palin seems to have taken a conscious decision to wear skirts, unlike Hillary Clinton and her jokey "sisterhood of the travelling pantsuit" – but their agenda is even more anti-feminist than their male peers.

That's why they get so far, even if their supporters sometimes underestimate the reach of their ambition.

Members of the Conservative Party in Britain were not universally thrilled in 1975 when Margaret Thatcher successfully challenged a former prime minister, Edward Heath, for the leadership. Baroness Thatcher, as she now is, identified so strongly with men that she included only two women in her Cabinet during her time as prime minister. In so doing she created such a dearth of female experience in the Conservative Party that her successor, John Major, did not put a single woman in his first cabinet.

That is what makes right-wing women so dangerous to other women. They have perfected the trick of stamping a feminine image on male power and selling it as something new, when what they are in reality the most fervent upholders of the status quo or even determined – as Palin is over reproductive rights – to turn the clock back.

I'm always surprised that this paradox isn't immediately visible to seasoned political commentators, who should have observed it often enough by now. It may be that the gushing, awestruck commentaries on Palin's performance in Minneapolis will give way over the next eight weeks to a more sober assessment of her candidacy, especially when she faces her much more experienced Democratic opponent, Senator Joe Biden, in a televised debate.

In the meantime, it speaks volumes that the only woman in this crucial presidential contest is the beneficiary of patronage, hand-picked rather than elected, and the holder of startlingly reactionary views. The American electorate is allowed to vote for Sarah Palin, if it so wishes, but not Hillary Clinton: patriarchy still rules OK.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
16. This line sent a shudder through me:
"But he has put his finger on a central truth about the woman who in two months' time could become the next vice-president of the US."


Not a chill. A shudder.

This. Must. Not. Happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
17. She may love Jesus, but acts like Pontius Pilate
They BOTH played people against each other in order to further their careers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
judasdisney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
18. When will a Democrat directly challenge Palin's supposed Christian conduct?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
19. Palin church promotes converting homosexuals at upcoming "Pray Away the Gay" conference
Edited on Sun Sep-07-08 09:51 AM by seafan
Palin church promotes converting homosexuals at upcoming "Pray Away the Gay" conference, September 7, 2008


And the hatred flows forth in the church of Sarah Palin.







Anita Bryant


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC