Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I was starting to doubt the rumor about Trig's parents until I bought US Magazine

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 03:06 PM
Original message
I was starting to doubt the rumor about Trig's parents until I bought US Magazine
They showed 2 pictures of Sarah Palin at 7 months pregnant. One when she was pregnant with Trig and one from one of her earlier kids.

Let's put it this way - when Sarah was 7 months pregnant before she showed. She was a fit pregnant mom but she definately had a bump there that was very obvious that she was pregnant.

I honestly do not believe that Trig could feasibly be her child.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow. How insightful. 8 days of this bullshit wasn't enough for you, obviously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. You seriously need to change your name to cryingnanny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. I was wrong about Edwards affair - I think I 'll withhold judgement on this one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Dose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
70. Here you are again, getting outraged by someone who doesn't believe Palin's BS about Trig's birth.
Interesting. If you're so fed up with all of it, why not just ignore the posts speculating about your precious Sarah instead of posting in every single one of them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
97. Why focus on important issues when we can
have 8 more days of soap operas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
112. Every Palin thread brings out the Palin police now.
I'm so glad to have these people telling us to shut up all the time. Otherwise how would we know we've said enough?

Here's a thought. If you don't like the threads on this board, find another board and leave us alone. We'll talk about what we want to. Or are you going to fire us all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Who names their kid after a roll on deodorant anyway?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Hey, watch it!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I thought you were named after the movie star. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. The movie star AND the deodorant
yeah...that's right...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I just noticed now where his sister or mom's name came from.
Same ad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Oooh, you're right
good catch
I'm pretty sure it's the latter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContinentalOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
69. Holy shit! Hahaha, that's weird.
Edited on Sat Sep-06-08 07:25 PM by ContinentalOp
We should have a poll on what the next kid will be named.
Crumble
Trickle
or Messy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QueenOfCalifornia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. I wish you
and all others would lay off this poor kid and his name.

Trig is a norse name - not any worse than naming your kid Trip or Amber - It's just a little babies name and this sort of crap makes liberals look like idiots.

Jeesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Mitchum started it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #15
82. Did not
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #82
89. Did so! And you made me do something tasteless and offensive
-and got me in trouble. Not Bristol trouble, but some....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
59. Learn something new every day
Edited on Sat Sep-06-08 05:59 PM by nichomachus
Trig and Track -- I thought she named her boys after "things she flunked in high school."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
38. Bottom line of the ad
"Another fine product of Bristol...."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kansasblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
47. Mr Palin is a math teacher. Named after trigonometry. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #47
61. Should have gone with the much cooler Sohcahtoa!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #61
75. Best thing I ever learned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #75
78. In my class it was Oscar Had A Hunk Of Ass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #47
64. They let people without college degrees teach math in Alaska?
I thought I read that he only had "some college credits."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. We probably should let this topic die
The main reason why I accept that she is the mother is because babies with Down Syndrome are more commonly born to older women than to teenagers.

Either way, there are many real issues with which we should attack her, without generating sympathy from her supporters, too many of them were charmed by her and are not going to listen to logic, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. I've known a 23 year old child have a Downs baby
it is not unheard of with those under 40. When I grew up, there was a family that was close with our family and their oldest child had Downs and she had that child when she was 19.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
27. That's actually untrue. Because older women are tested
because of the risk, most babies with Down Syndrome are born to women under 30.

Exactly the opposite of what we might think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #27
99. She was tested. They knew she was carrying a fetus with a a Down Syndrom
This is the fodder they provide to the RWers: "she chose not to abort the baby."

Perhaps I should have used the term "carried by" older women, instead of "born."

The stats are that the older the woman is the more chances are for a Down Syndrome baby. This is why, when amniocentesis first was developed, it was offered mostly to women over 35.

Even today: "Prenatal screening tests are routinely offered to women over the age of 35, due to their increased chances of giving birth to a child with a disability; however, pregnant women of any age can request a test or choose not to have it done. If the estimate determined by prenatal screening is high, doctors will often advise a mother to undergo diagnostic testing."

http://www1.ndss.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=category§ionid=23&id=60&Itemid=234

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #99
111. Do you have a link to where it was announced that Trig had Down Syndrome before he was born?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
33. Far more children with Down's Syndrome are born to women under 35 than over 40
It's just that the odds are far greater with women over 40. But far fewer women have children
at that age as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
34. dupe
Edited on Sat Sep-06-08 05:08 PM by ClarkUSA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. Bill Maher still doesn't buy it that Trig is her's either. He brought it up last night on
Real Time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough already Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
83. We know she's a damn liar
Why should I believe her on the kid's real mother? This needs to be pursued hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greendog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
14. She announced her pregnancy the day after McCain clinched...
...the Republican nomination.

Maybe Dobson & Co. fixed her up with a down syndrome baby to round out her cred with the base. It seems likely that they're the ones who forced her on to the ticket.

:tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Do we know that the baby absolutely has Downs?
I mean I'm not questioning that this child doesn't have something but there are plenty of other development issues that could occur at birth. Saying it's Downs would at least help make it seem like the child is Sarah since Downs is more common (but not limited at all) to older women. Remember Sarah would not see a doctor in Texas AND would not see any doctor in Anchorage, which is where the plane landed. All of this 12 hours after the water had broken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. That's a fair question, given Palin's history of lying.
We know she's lying about her political history.

What if the child is hers, but was harmed by her failure to seek medical attention promptly? It's possible she and her family Doc cook up the story of Downs, instead of having a scandal.

With Palin, anything is possible, because the one thing most prevalent about fundies is their absolute ability to lie about anything they can rationalize God would want them to hide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greendog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. We know what they tell us.
And we should know to question all of it.

The down syndrome baby is a REAL IMPORTANT part of her story. That's why I think it's fair to question it.

Last Saturday it was bugging me so I googled a couple things:

~~~~1. McCain clinches nomination ~~~~> 3/4/08

~~~~2. Palen announces pregnancy ~~~~~> 3/5/08

Been wearing the hat ever since~~~~~> :tinfoilhat:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colinmom71 Donating Member (616 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. There have been several photos circulating from the Palin family's time at the RNC...
That show Trig quite well. He clearly has the facial features common to babies with Down Syndrome. If you can find the photos that Meghan McCain had on her blog (sorry, saw the link here at DU several days ago and didn't think to save it), she had some really clear photos of the baby and I could tell that he definitely looks like a DS child...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. Well, at the risk of Fristing the baby.
He has the epicanthic folds of a baby with DS. I'd be surprised if that particular little prop of Palin's didn't, actually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #18
35. Do you have eyes? Look at his photos.
The baby clearly has Downs syndrome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
16. So who would his mother be?
Wouldn't Bristol have had to get pregnant within the first month??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
17. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
pansypoo53219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
19. how do you know she didn't PUPOSELY girdle herself up trying to get rid of trig
you know, oops, i miscarried. down's doesn't happen to women like beauty queen nazi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
21. One more time....
Days before giving birth:

April 2008


Last year
2007:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Top photo contrast adjusted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #21
42. The 2008 picture doesn't prove she was pregnant,
Edited on Sat Sep-06-08 05:27 PM by Phx_Dem
it simply proves she looks pregnant. I'm not saying she wasn't pregnant or that she isn't Trig's mother, but that photo doesn't prove anything. IF she were trying to cover for her daughter, wouldn't it make sense that she would wear a fake "pregnancy stomach?"

There are so many open questions and strange occurances regarding her pregnancy and Trig's birth, but the one thing that makes me believe she is Trig's mother is that he has DS. Of course, that doesn't prove anything either.

The only thing that will prove it definitively are her medical records and Trig's birth certificate. If she was carrying a special needs baby, she had to have lots of medical records documenting that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #21
62. She looks pretty pregnant to me....
I think the issue is the fact that her water broke, she felt contractions and did not seek medical attention. She then waited 26 hours to deliver. To me that is child abuse....plain and simple....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #21
100. now get her picture one month and a week before when she announced. march 6? she grew faster in
that one month and one week then all other women do in 4, 5, 6 months. the reason i gave you three different months is we do it at varying stages but in one month and one week you do not go from not showing, to THIS.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
24. Vanity Fair does too ......... Poll
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #24
43. This is crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough already Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #43
84. The only thing 'crazy' is taking this witch at her word
I don't believe her. I think she lies every time she opens her damn mouth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #24
104. 69% believe Bristol is the mama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trashcanistanista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
26. She could end this with presenting a birth certificate.
There is no shame in presenting a birth certificate, Obama had to. Why hasn't she done this yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. Because there is no record of Trig's birth at the hospital she said he was born in.
Which means either Trig was born privately or he was born in another hospital. I suspect the former.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #31
41. Nope.
There are no photos or birth announcement on hospital's website.
Which is not the same as hospital having no record of his birth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #41
45. Then it should be easy for Palin to release a birth certificate to quiet the rumor mill, eh?
Funny how she went back to work after THREE days. I don't think any woman who's given birth can fathom that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. As the story goes, she gave birth to the daughter Piper over night
and went back to work the next day.
She is a regular wonder woman, that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #46
50. Link? Where'd you here that?
Edited on Sat Sep-06-08 05:42 PM by ClarkUSA
I don't believe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. I've read it right here on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #52
57. I haven't read anything of the sort anywhere so let's file that under improbable heresay, shall we?
Edited on Sat Sep-06-08 06:01 PM by ClarkUSA
:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #57
72. She had Piper in her sleep. didn't notice, went to work
and boy was her husband upset when he called the office to tell her.

LOL enough already.

so much silly speculation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #72
94. LOL all you want.
Edited on Sat Sep-06-08 09:50 PM by lizzy
According to Palin herself, she had the kid (Piper) on Monday and went back to work on Tuesday.
For all I know she would have gone back the next day with Trig, but he was born on Friday.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #94
106. How does she define "back to work"? I had my first child on a Saturday...
worked (VP Sales) the day before, and was on the phone w/ an ornery client when Beanies was 3 days old. Pretty funny arguing with a law firm administrator over a billing dispute (from home) while breastfeeding the newborn...so I guess I went back to work 3 days after giving birth.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slampoet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #52
65. Where on DU.? Link or STFU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #65
95. STFU yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slampoet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #95
107. You're the one without the source.

Without a source you are just displaying your ignorance like it's something to be proud of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slampoet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #95
110. PS- your three year old wants his comebacks returned to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #52
66. I read that too--it was on DU, an article that quoted one of her
associates from when she was mayor--he was bragging about her having Piper at night and being back at work the next day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #66
71. One of Palin's associates said it, eh? Covering for her to save their jobs, more likely.
Edited on Sat Sep-06-08 07:30 PM by ClarkUSA
It is highly unbelievable. Do you know what a woman looks like/feels like the day after when
all the fluids from the upper half descends into her lower half?

Getting back to the point, where's the birth certificate? You'd think a governor's birth would
make it to the hospital's website when other lesser mortals/women have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thirtieschild Donating Member (978 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #71
76. How you feel after childbirth depends on lots of things
The way you're built, how many times you've given birth, how quickly you give birth, whether you had an episiotomy (sp?) That being said, there is something exceedingly strange about this whole story, how Bristol looks (five months pregnant and wearing a belted straight skirt????), the trip from Texas to Alaska while the amniotic fluid was leaking. I would think that anyone who can go back to work three days after giving birth had an easy labor and probably has babies fast. Which means that trip would have been out of the question. Makes no sense at all. Either she didn't mind putting the baby in jeopardy or it's all a lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #71
114. I felt fine, and I had a real 24 hour labor, and a much larger baby.
I could have done desk work within two hours of the birth, and only that long of a wait because I was absolutely starving (no food while you're in labor, in case they have to knock you out for an emergency section) and needed time to down three plates of terrible hospital food.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #50
77. The lady herself said something like it, though she doesn't quite say "next day":
Edited on Sat Sep-06-08 08:40 PM by WinkyDink
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #77
93. She said she had the kid on Monday and went back to work
on Tuesday.
Which would be the next day.
Hello?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #45
101. instead of showing birth certificate, she OUTS her daughter that she is around 5 months preg.
what a mom. once again putting self before her child
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #26
113. A birth certificate means nothing. The doctor is a crony of hers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
28. This is what did it for me.
Her story about the flight from TX to AK. NO mother I know, and I'm a suburban mom so I know plenty, would EVER endanger their baby in that manner.

She was AMA, Advanced Maternal Age, which is an actual OB/GYN diagnosis AND carrying a baby with Down Syndrome. At this point medically, it's not really possible to determine the cardiac defects in a DS baby as well in utero as can be done when they are born.

I CANNOT IMAGINE ANY MOM DOING THIS!!!! ANY MOM!!!!

So, it's one of three things. She's either a liar about this story, or she lied about who the baby's mom is, or she jeopardized that baby's life.

She's a POS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
30. I saw the same side-by-side picture comparison and came to the same conclusion.
Edited on Sat Sep-06-08 05:04 PM by ClarkUSA
At 7 months, Sarah Palin was huge in her previous pregnancy whereas with Trig she had a flat tummy.
And she went back to work after THREE days. Uh huh.

Not only that, but stewardesses on that flight she took when she allegedly was leaking amniotic fluid
due to her water breaking said that she did not look pregnant and gave no indication that she was
uncomfortable.

Also, Bristol Palin was taken out of school for 8 months during the same time period as when Trig was
born allegedly due to mononucleosis. There's 2 family photos of her in mid-late 2007 where Bristol
has distinctly progressively bigger tummy bumps.

Hmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
32. Dammit, Lynne. You used to be smarter than this.
The only plausible reason for her to pretend that a child that wasn't her own actually was hers was to cover up her daughter's pregnancy. Now that that baseless theory is exploded... just what earthly reason could Palin have for pretending that someone else's child is hers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. Bristol could easily have gotten pregnant again. How do we know how far she's really along?
Edited on Sat Sep-06-08 05:14 PM by ClarkUSA
She doesn't look 5 months pregnant to me. There was hardly any sign she was pregnant when she greeted
McCain at the airport last Thursday. It seems to me that Sarah Palin lies as effortlessly as she breathes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. You owe me a new brick wall
This one's wearing out :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. Um, I'll bet you didn't think Edwards was having an affair, either.
Edited on Sat Sep-06-08 05:22 PM by ClarkUSA
I did.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. What do you base that conclusion about me on?
I honestly don't think or care about politicians' sex lives. The important thing is that once the facts came out, I didn't continue to deny the obvious. People who think Sarah Palin is pretending to be the mother of this infant yet can't offer one shred of evidence and can't offer a plausible theory as to why she would even want to go through such a potentially dangerous charade, are simply being obstinate--if not trollish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #44
48. Because you seem the type. And the facts/evidence indicate Sarah Palin was not pregnant.
Edited on Sat Sep-06-08 05:57 PM by ClarkUSA
At least to me and the OP and many other people. Your patronizing attitude is
noted, though.

I don't know what "facts" or "evidence" you're referring to -- unless you believe
that everything Sarah Palin and the McCain campaign says fall into those categories.

The reason she would want to go through such a charade is obvious. Such charades
have existed in conservative societies for ages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #44
121. one of two things. take your pick. she wasnt preg and used breaking water to get back, pretend, OR
she did a horribly stupid beyond stupid thing not getting medical care for over 18 hours after her water start leaking and went into a plane where no medical care was available, unheard of. simply not done. at all.

meaning poor judgment in a life or death situation with her own child. as pres she will face life and death situations with strangers. if she cannot make a simple good choice with her baby, why should we trust her, at all even a little.

those are the only two choices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #36
49. We only know what Sarah has told us. Unfortunately,
Sarah has proven to be a liar about a number of things so I can't take her word for anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #32
40. I'm smart enough to know what 7months pregnant looks like
and what doesn't look like 7 months and that picture in US Magazine was pretty damning if you ask me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GalleryGod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #40
63. I agree,Lynne
Alaska is Peyton Place Crazy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #40
85. The only possible explanation - could the DS mean the child
was so much smaller? Does anyone ever look like that at 7 months? Pregnancies can be different for the same woman - different symptoms and different amounts of weight gain.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #32
53. Because if it were true, that would make Sarah a liar and a fraud.
That's is a pretty good reason to continue to lie especially when you're an elected official and now on the presidential ticket.

The bottom line is we don't know what is true. And we won't until or unless someone provides definitive proof (birth certificate AND medical records). I won't be holding my breath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #32
87. PALIN'S PREGNANT UNMARRIED TEEN DAUGHTER could be that fecund
The first kid is likely hers and she could very well be pregnant again already. I don't know why you keep wanting to deny that very simple biological fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pkz Donating Member (595 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
51. I wasn't gonna go there....but *pics* fixed
Edited on Sat Sep-06-08 06:07 PM by pkz
They claim that Trig is being breast fed.
Just look at the difference and you tell me...do ya know engorged when ya see it?







HUGE increase in girth or whatever ya call thickness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #51
54. Exactly.
There have been others who've noticed Bristol's rather large bustline (far larger than photos taken
early last year) and contrasted that with her mother's petite bustline.

Hmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. Well, if you want to go there, at 17, someone's bustline
could still be growing. Jeez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pkz Donating Member (595 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. well, been there done that too
and I do know the largest size exaggeration
is post-partum not in the 1st or 2nd trimester
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #56
68. Here's the pic you were looking for: Baby Daddy Levi kissing Trig held by Baby Mommy Bristol
Funny, there's not too many 18 year old young men who would go out of their way to kiss a baby
but the self-proclaimed fucking redneck does. Wonder why?

http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/09/the-softer-side.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #68
79. That may well be Big Sis and prospective BIL, but it sure could pass for the nuclear family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #51
60. Bristol looks like she could be breast feeding in this pic.
Edited on Sat Sep-06-08 06:02 PM by Phx_Dem
Sarah definitely does not appear to be breast feeding, but she could be lying about it.

"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #60
67. Oh, for God's sake! What is this, boob watch?
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #67
90. No, it's "breast feeding boob" watch
And if you don't like it, read elsewhere. I always love it when people who are so disgusted with certain threads can't stop reading them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #51
115. After the first week or two, engorgement goes away.
Many breastfeeding women wear their normal bra size after the initial engorgement. I had A cup nursing bras- let me tell you those were a bitch to find- and I definitely was nursing a real, live baby quite frequently, and I had milk to spare. Meanwhile, my pudgy teenage sister, who was about Bristol's age at the time, had a porn-star quality set. That didn't mean I was secretly raising her recently delivered baby, only that the titty fairy visited her room twice and missed mine. Yay for normal human variation.

This is the stupidest argument for babygate yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
58. Keep hope alive!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
73. maybe it is a love child
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
74. She didn't even tell her kids that she was going to have a Down's Kid
until after the child was born and the other children saw him for the first time. Seems she couldn't bear to give her kids "bad news". So says People magazine. Doesn't being Governor & VP involve having to tell others bad news? WTF? That's leadership?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #74
92. I am starting to think that her peculiar behavior
during pregnancy (not telling people until she was 7 months into it, flying after amniotic fluid was leaking, etc) has a lot more to do with the fact that this child had Downs syndrome than with any conspiracy theory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
80. Maybe the father is Kramer from Seinfeld. In the show he wanted to call his kid "Isosceles"
Edited on Sat Sep-06-08 08:46 PM by JBoy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
81. only thing i know is the sisters are more affectionate towards Trig
than the parents are.

but i was thinking this could be just because they grew up kind of raising each other with the parents being away. Bristol watching over her younger sisters and now them all watching over Trig.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamstersFromHell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #81
103. I've noticed that as well...
Bristol seems to very protective of Trig, while the alleged mom seems to handle him like he's a stage prop.

The real kicker for me is the airline flight...as someone on another board commented, what OB in their right mind would allow a woman leaking amniotic fluid to board an airliner for a roughly 12 hour flight with layovers and a long car drive afterward? We're talking MASSIVE risk of a malpractice suit there should something happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
86. Not to my Credit, I read the whole thread
And I have to propose that you are all very wrong. In fact, Levi is the mother, Trig is the father, and Sarah is the child. Thats obviously why no one heard of her until very recently.

Until there is some proof, its hardly relevant. So who cares, and why waste time on this unless and until there is proof. Not guesses, but actual proof. Who cares who had the baby, much less who is feeding it. Is there any single person on this board who doubts that Sarah Palin is a liar? Is there any single person who cannot prove, using words from her own mouth and public records that she has lied to anyone and everyone who has heard her speak in the past 7 days?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley_glad_hands Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
88. Isn't it more difficult to near immpossible for a woman to get pregnant while breastfeeding?
Something to do with hormones produced while lactating?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #88
91. It's more difficult but certainly not impossible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #88
102. totally false myth and a lot of preg women have learned. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rbrnmw Donating Member (789 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #102
118. my youngest 2 are 18 months apart
I was breastfeeding when I got pregnant with the baby it happens
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #118
120. i was sittin in gyno for my second child. they at least were 2 and half years apart
a woman was holding a baby and i asked, you preg. she say yup. i giggled and said, you thought breast feeding would be the contraceptive, and she giggles.... not that she didnt embrace it and all, but it was something we were told/lead to believe, and reality..... doesnt always work that way.

just something i will remember.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #88
116. No.
Frequent, exclusive breastfeeding tends to delay the onset of ovulation, but it's not "damn near impossible" by any stretch of the imagination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Condem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
96. Who owns US magazine?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
98. Track! What about Track!!
He enlists in the army in September 2007, and is not willing to discuss the reason (the article from the time actually states that -- which is peculiar, because why should he need to state a reason?) Every account of his enlistment is shrouded in some sort of mystery.

Count forward from Sept 2007.

What could have possibly happened around Sept 2007 that was so "big" that it resulted in his enlistment?

Remember that he was 18 at the time.

But let's just suppose that if he is anything like his sister, he may have been fooling around with a girlfriend... clearly the "abstinence" message didn't get through to at least one of the kids.

What if he had a girlfriend who was younger than 18?

What if she got pregnant?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greblc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #98
117. Track is Triggs Father? That would make him an uncle too.
Sorry this thread is too ridiculous. The Palin Family is a train wreck. We could stop at that but this is fun. Kinda like Springer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uberllama42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
105. I say "enough"
When are we going to drop this bullshit and hit Palin on real issues? Every minute we spend discussing the Palins' wombs is a minute we could have used to talk about Sarah's ethical investigation, criminal activity, penchant for pork, Xian fundamentalism, lack of experience, pro-life extremism, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
108. What REALLY bothers me is the "BLACK IS WHITE, NIGHT IS DAY" theme.
Blatant, absurd lies that anyone in their right mind would question. But things have become so ass backwards that when you state the obvious you are branded a 'kook' or conspiracy theorist.

I couldn't care less about the perceived 'morality' of this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nine Donating Member (472 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #108
124. I wish I could rec' an individual post.
Anyone who believes the official story is dumber than a box of rocks. Even the official story is full of contradictions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
109. can we see the genetics, maybe Trig isn't her husband's
you didn't think of that LynneSin!



;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
119. This place...
just keeps getting Weirder and WEIRDER!!! unreal...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
122. according to the NYT article, Palin didn't tell her own children and parents she was pregnant until.
third trimester.

******************


Most had learned that Ms. Palin was pregnant only a few weeks before. Struggling to accept that her child would be born with Down syndrome and fearful of public criticism of a governor’s pregnancy, Ms. Palin had concealed the news that she was expecting even from her parents and children until her third trimester.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/08/us/politics/08baby.html?ref=us


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iceman66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
123. If she did fake the pregnancy . . .
. . . don't you think she WOULD have gone out of her way to LOOK pregnant?

This story is a red herring and will get us nowhere.

Best strategy against Palin is to highlight her extreme right-wing policy positions, which are out of the mainstream, and the McCain camp are going out of their way to de-emphasize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC