Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is there anything wrong with with the Obama team using the word "liar"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
PlanetBev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:15 PM
Original message
Is there anything wrong with with the Obama team using the word "liar"
Edited on Sat Sep-06-08 05:16 PM by PlanetBev
I saw Rachel Maddow's video calling them exactly what the Republicans are and it was very, very effective.

If the other side is going to make this about character, we've got to play them at their own game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Obama has been using the "LIE" word quite a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Obama came close
He said, "You can't just make stuff up."

It's a start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marsala Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's dangerous to throw the word "liar" around
But if the Republicans keep it up, Obama probably will start using it, since it will be completely irrefutable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. I agree. When fact-checking an opponent's speeches, the NUMBER OF TIMES a false
Edited on Sat Sep-06-08 06:12 PM by ProgressiveEconomist
statement has been used and the level of vetting a false statement must have gotten are very relevant. Plus, "the medium is the message". Hot words like "liar" may lead media consumers to believe the candidate who uses them is "angry" or "hotheaded".

The first or second time a statement is made, IMO an appropriate reply is, "Please check your facts--that's not accurate. Independent source X says ... See factcheck.barackobama.com for documentation of what they said."

When the opponent repeats the false statement repeatedly after having been rebutted publicly, IMO it's appropriate to reply, "You must know that statement is FALSE. We've talked about this before, more than once."

But when the head of the ticket repeats known false statements in TV ads and in prime-time televised prepared speeches, "That is a deliberately false statement" may be appropriate, if it is accompanied by a detailed description of previous face-to-face rebuttals of the same falsehood. In any case Obama, Biden, Clinton, or other key Democrats must keep their cool whenever cameras may be turned on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's bad marketing to throw the word "liar" around
Saying "John McCain just doesn't get it" helps to reframe the story on the Republicans without actually saying "he's old and blind".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. If it was my campaign, I would make liberal use of the term
'LYING SACKS OF SHIT!'

but that's just me :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Well, I'm in sympathy with your term "LYING SACKS OF SHIT!".
However, that might be a bit too strong for your average political speech. "Just making stuff up" is precise enough to get the point across.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PlanetBev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Unfortunately, I've had the jitters the last few days
Edited on Sat Sep-06-08 05:20 PM by PlanetBev
I know we've got an amazing team that won't take any bullshit, but it's so hard watching these puke assholes pull the same shit election year after election year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. You can only use the word, Liar, if you can prove the other party KNEW they
were not telling the truth versus they had the facts wrong.

Until Obama can do that, he can give the facts with evidence and rhetorically say "We both can't be right. Let them show you their evidence, and you, the voters decide."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIdaho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. Its about time someone did.
McCain and Gimmick look into the camera lens and lie their asses off - its about time someone refuses to put a civilized face on this reprehensible behavior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knixphan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. nothing stopping US
let's go!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. Not if it's undisputed. Lying should not be tolerated. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC