Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Palin On OH: "We Have To Take This State"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 12:00 PM
Original message
Palin On OH: "We Have To Take This State"

LEBANON, Ohio - GOP veep nom Sarah Palin hammered Barack Obama today for securing earmarks for his state and reiterated her opposition to the "Bridge to Nowhere."

"As we reformed the abuses of earmarks in our state, our opponent was requesting nearly a billion dollars in earmarks as a senatorial privilege as I was vetoing half a billion as an executive responsibility," she told a crowd outside the historic Golden Lamb hotel before introducing John McCain.

Palin has come under fire from Democrats and some political analysts for saying she opposed federal funding for a bridge to a sparsely populated Alaskan town, when she originally supported the bridge as a candidate for governor. Regardless, she kept the line in her stump speech today to reinforce her gubernatorial record as a reformer, a key part of the pitch for the GOP ticket.

"It is now time to take that positive agenda of relief for taxpayers on a national level, and we will work for that tax relief for all of you," she said.

Palin, making her second visit to Ohio since joining the ticket, stressed the general election importance of the state, which she said would be a "tough battle."

"We have to take this state," she said.

http://hotlineblog.nationaljournal.com/archives/2008/09/palin_on_oh_we.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Even though the bridge went nowhere, didn't she keep the earmark?
And just send it to other projects?

That said, as a Michigander, I don't have much faith in the state of Ohio. Reassure me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abbiehoff Donating Member (356 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Right - it hardly matters whether she was for the bridge
or against it.

She took the money.
Isn't that the point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. How many times is she going to lie, repeatedly, after she's been debunked?
Here, I'll answer my own question: She's got to keep on doing it, because without the Bridge and earmark and Ebay nonsense, she has NO REAL RECORD to point to. She'd have to stand there and talk about piddly things, and America would realize she's a pretty bag of nothing special.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CitizenPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. LIAR
"It is now time to take that positive agenda of relief for taxpayers on a national level, and we will work for that tax relief for all of you," she said.


and her plan is.....WHAT? these are a bunch of words that are exactly the opposite of their plan.

cuz what she's talking about sure sounds like that "socialism" i keep hearing about. you know, when you stop raping the middle class?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. Palin got 10 TIMES the earmark $$ that Obama did, per resident.
She is a lying sack of moose shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. They will take this state when they pry it from our cold dead fingers.
What idiots. They're preaching "tax relief" in OHIO???

Ohioans don't NEED "tax relief." They need JOBS. And many of them who have jobs get tax refunds every year because they earn so little.

This is the WRONG state in which to use "tax relief" as your platform--unless you're talking only to the richest one-half of one percent of the state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC