Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Poll numbers result from prior CAMPAIGN decisions & actions. It is DUMB to ignore GOP EFFECTIVENESS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 01:13 PM
Original message
Poll numbers result from prior CAMPAIGN decisions & actions. It is DUMB to ignore GOP EFFECTIVENESS
Edited on Tue Sep-09-08 01:37 PM by Sensitivity
Plouffe and Axlerod have been helping Barack Obama run a fantastic campaign at the STRATEGIC and OPERATIONAL levels.

But the actions and inactions of the last 2 weeks show that TACTICALLY we have been whipped by the McCain team. The Campaign was beaten in specific ways:

1. They were ready to stomp on the Biden pick and leverage it against Obama
2. We were not able (or willing) to DAMAGE the McCain brand during our convention
3. We did not build the OBAMA brand during most of our convention but focused on Clinton and rescuing party unity.
4. They were ready to drop the Palin bomb on our fantastic Obama Acceptance Speech and our convention Bounce.
5. They shaped the Palin pick as TRANSFORMATIVE and EXPANSIVE -- energizing BASE and going after WOMEN and INDEPENDENTS
6. We were unprepared to hobble her and allowed them to protect her BRAND
7. They focused their convention on UPLIFTING MCCAIN and DEMONIZING Democrat and Obama
8. The used their convention to REINVENT their Party
9. We had nothing prepared to stomp on their convention Bounce

Now, they have undercut our strategic advantage with the CHANGE message and the democratic trend in the WOMEN vote.

In the next 60 days the TACTICAL game is what counts most. BUT, the Rethugs tend to win on TACTICS-- specically SMEAR TACTICS.

Can we win this bare-knuckle tactical game?

Or is there yet a new Strategic Play for us to change the game and WIN?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Boz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Your concern is noted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good points
The Obama team seemed to be waiting to see what the polls said before reacting to Palin. This follows their very slow response to McCain's attacks on Obama earlier in the campaign. If they aren't able to get out in front of the Republicans, then it's likely we will lose this election.

When Democrats are on the offensive, they can win. When we are constantly on the defensive (see Al Gore and John Kerry), then we increase our chances of losing.

By the time Obama figures out the Palin problem, Republicans will probably have thrown something else big at him, and the cycle of being on the defensive will start again. That's why we need to be on the offensive all of the time. Obama needs to put the Republicans on the defensive if he wants to win. Being nice will not work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. "we had nothing prepared to stomp on their convention bounce"
you sure of that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. No major event/announcement Day After McCain speech. Did I miss it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
23. ah, I thought you meant in the next few days
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. Remeber how McCain had false leaks all night after Obama's speech to distract
discussion from Obama to his Veep pick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. The bounce seems to have ... bounced
I think we'll be surprised at the next week -- in a good way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
34. Hope so
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
9119495 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. As a rebuttal...
1. republicans got to go second...always an advantage there as you can announce a VP (or something else big) to suck out the wind of the convention.

2. The McCain brand is tough to damage because he is perceived as a hero. This demands a whole different tactical playbook...I think they made the right choice by trying to tie him to bush...and that will pay off soon as people shift away from the magic pixie Palin to the bad news that surrounds us.

3. Palin is LOOSING women, not gaining them. Soon men will probably come around.

4. We don't need to reinvent our party, they do. We just have to convince people to trust us to solve the issues. Poll after poll shows the public trusts us more than the republicans.

5. The Obama announcement is coming. While everyone is going Palin crazy, Obama's fundraising team is calculating their donations and I assure you, this month it is a BIG JOB. I predict a record shattering 70 million.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Good points. "Palin is LOOSING women" ?? Where did you get that?? 1 Poll showed 20 pt
gain among white women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
9119495 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I'm looking...back in a second.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. That poll was disproved by Chuck Todd, he said...
Edited on Tue Sep-09-08 01:57 PM by Jennicut
the #'s don't add up if McCain and Obama are essentially tied in the same poll. Now please go away and do something useful for Obama instead of posting all these sky is falling threads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Sky is not falling and LOSING IS NOT AN OPTION THIS TIME.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
9119495 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Here it is. Women are not fooled by her. Some men apparently are
but, they probably have like gun racks on their trucks and stuff.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/09/09/poll-women-and-men-dont-see-eye-to-eye-on-palin/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Agreed. But does not debunk ABC/WP poll. Women typically trend DEM and more critical of R women
Edited on Tue Sep-09-08 02:58 PM by Sensitivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. The didn't "reinvent" their party ...
they spent four days with the saddest, most pathetically superficial and childish bashing of BO and the Ds, went ape shiite over a modestly well delivered preprepared speech by Palin and mananaged to stay awake for McCain's bottom five acceptance speech of the last 100 years.

The offered NOTHING, N O T H I N G at their convention other than smug and snarky shots at democrats.

As someone else noted, McCain and the Rs got LUCKY to have their convention second, and put it right after the Ds, not a lot BO could have done - In theory he could have dreamed up some big event/speech, but outside of that you have the media going off about Palin.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #18
36. McCain campaign: party was born anew during convention- - funny, I know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
win_in_06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
31. why did the republicans "get" to go second?
Edited on Tue Sep-09-08 04:25 PM by win_in_06
As I recall, they went second in 04, and used their convention to mock Kerry's "reporting for duty".

Is this a right of the incumbent party, or did the RNC outmaneuver the DNC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. Obama has to get desperate NOW
in order to avoid looking desperate later.

The Convention was the ultimate opportunity, but he failed to turn it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Uh, the DNC convention was considered a success. Remember "unity"?
It was a big question that got answered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. That unity crap was idiocy.
A waste of a good convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
32. Let's all hold hands!
We don't need to fight John McCain, we can Unity him into submission!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. I really was just a crazy as it looked. Created drama, but left McBush untouched
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
35. Just saw Rethug "Sex Education" AD -- They are going for the KILL NOW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
15. The rumored change re letting loose 527's may indicate change to FREE-FIRE STRATEGY
Maybe there is a decision to let the Independent groups respond nationally to whatever they want while the Campaign focuses on their state by state battleground plans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
16. right-- I thought the focus on "unity" and not McCrap was a big mistake.
Which we are paying for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. Right, ignoring unity when all the talk was Hillary 24/7 that week.
Yeah, real good strategy. We had to prove we could heal after the primaries and we did that and then we attacked McCain with Clinton and Biden and then Obama went after McCain the next night. What is wrong with you people and your revisionist history? It just happened two weeks ago! Go back and watch youtube or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wolverinez Donating Member (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
19. All of this is true, as sick as it makes me. Same old shit, new election.
nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Obama has much better social network and ground organization, but need a Game Change now

I expect they are working on something. If we sit on our hand its over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wolverinez Donating Member (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Ground game is nice, but message mahcine is even better.
nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
20. Go get 'em, Sensitivity!
Obama's greatest supporter on these boards, ladies and gentlemen!

Sensitivity!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. "Negativity." Imagine living with it.
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Sensitivity is looking out for us!
We don't need Polyanna's in here in denial denial denial. Let's all change Obama's campaign strategy RIGHT NOW! Let's do it!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. It's pure genius. I just don't know why the campaign hasn't hired it... nt
Edited on Tue Sep-09-08 03:02 PM by blondeatlast
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
28. Oy vay, another "concerned" backseat armchair campaign manager thread from this OP!
I can't wait for tomorrow's panic opus. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
29. IDEA: If we could ORCHESTRATE a series of Rep & Ind Endorsements based on RISKINESS of PALIN pick
this would be a good time. BLOOMBERG, POWELL, HAGEL come to mind, but their could be others.

Pondering about Koch's "scary" comments made me think on this.

One could in one operation leverage the attention the is going to Palin and accomplish a few strategically important things:

1. Make McCain PAY for his base-pandering by using it to damage his credibility with Indies
2. Improve Obama's post-partisan Brand
3. Make "McCain-Palin" the risky, roll-the-dice choice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sampsonblk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
37. I vote for #2 and #9 and the real kickers
2. We were not able (or willing) to DAMAGE the McCain brand during our convention

9. We had nothing prepared to stomp on their convention Bounce



#2 is the mistake we make almost every single time. If anyone has an explanation for this, I would love to hear it.

#9 is just a complete shock to me, and suggests a hugel ost opportunity. Hopefully the Obama people will have learned from this. They really got outsmarted on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. Can help but think that Obama Campaign was unprepared for game-changing and vicious tactics of Repug
But they should have expected it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC