ClarkBayh 2008
(124 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 07:38 PM
Original message |
| Why isn't anyone outraged at Nader polling at 3.2% ??? |
|
Can anyone explain this to me how after all this.... someone would still support Nader?
|
| Guava Jelly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 07:40 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Because he isn't going to stop Obama from winning |
| AllieB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 07:41 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. I can't imagine anyone voting for him. |
|
However, I'm sure there are still some young, hardcore lefties that are seduced by his message. I can't imagine anyone on the right voting for him.
|
| tazkcmo
(668 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 07:42 PM
Response to Original message |
|
when people excercise they're constitutional rights, no matter how stupid they may seem to me.
|
| blogslut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 07:44 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Why should we be? Ralph Nader has his groupies. Big deal.
|
| liberalmuse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 07:44 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 07:44 PM by liberalmuse
Where exactly is he polling at 3%? Any asshat who would vote for him can't possibly be a rational, caring human being.
|
| Alexander
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 07:45 PM
Response to Original message |
| 6. He got 0.38% in 2004. I expect he'll do about the same this time. |
|
Nothing to worry about, unless the bulk of that comes from one swing state.
|
| Mojambo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 07:45 PM
Response to Original message |
| 7. What does outrage accomplish? |
| panader0
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 07:46 PM
Response to Original message |
| 8. 3.2!!! Wow! It's weird how people will support a candidate |
|
that has zero chance of winning.
|
| DB1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 07:47 PM
Response to Original message |
| 9. Because Democrats vote Democratic party. Also Barr and Paul will negate out of touch Ralph.. |
| TNMOM
(735 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 07:47 PM
Response to Original message |
|
you could be asking the Freeps the same question about Ron Paul...
|
| AlCzervik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 07:48 PM
Response to Original message |
| 11. because those 3.2 were never, ever in a million years going to vote for D or R |
| billyoc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 08:12 PM
Response to Original message |
| 12. A lot of people in safe states will vote for Nader. |
|
What's a vote for Nader in Boston hurt?
|
| Arugula Latte
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 08:15 PM
Response to Original message |
| 13. I don't think he'll crack 1 percent. |
|
If I were the repukes, I'd be very concerned about Ron Paul. We drove all over western Oregon this summer, lots of rural areas, and there was WAY more displayed support for Paul. I only saw one McCain sticker, and no yard signs, even in the reddest of the rednecky areas. Other people have reported similar things from other states. Even if Paul gets three or four percent in some states, that's enough to tip the balance.
|
| codjh9
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 08:38 PM
Response to Original message |
| 14. I didn't even think he was on the freakin' BALLOT. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:41 PM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
