Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Palin TOTALLY BLEW it re: who controls the nuclear weapons in Iran. It's NOT Ahmadinejad.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:09 PM
Original message
Palin TOTALLY BLEW it re: who controls the nuclear weapons in Iran. It's NOT Ahmadinejad.
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 10:10 PM by Roland99
The Supreme Leader is Iran's Commander-in-Chief.

Ahmadinejad, in matters of foreign policy, is but a mouthpiece. He only controls domestic issues.

I guess whoever briefed her doesn't know either. Gee...what a surprise.



Hell, her entire interview was like a poorly rehearsed job interview for school vice-principal.


Dumb as a Box of Rocks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. She doesn't know shit
Sad thing either does the average American.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. That is terrifying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. McCain seems to think the same thing.
He always obsesses about Ahmadinejad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Need boogey man
The Clerics aren't out making statements so their figurehead will do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
agentS Donating Member (922 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. I guess she wasn't paying attention to LIEbermann
maybe all she did was shoot moose and wolves when he went home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. Unfortunantly
how many Americans would catch this? I am guessing its a lot less than 50%, and under 50% even if you narrow it just to "likely voters".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. So she messed up on I'madinnerjacket (phonetic pronunciation)
Good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darkhawk32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. oops.
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 10:14 PM by Darkhawk32
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebenaube Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. oh so you are saying
that they have nuclear weapons now? Is that it... are we supposed to let that slide?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Excellent point. They don't have any yet...that we know of. But she made it seem they do.
And that Mahmoud is all but "hell-bent" on using them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. The N.I.E. report was that Iran had no nukes and could not have
any for @ least 3 to 5 years if they started today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. And that was probably the most liberal (ha!) of estimates.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darkhawk32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. lol. Good point. I'm sure Roland99 was just following the tortured logic. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. it's not "tortured logic", it's "enhanced interrogated" logic
:)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darkhawk32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. Sadly enough...................
99% of the American public doesn't know that either. So, she can say anything she wants and no one would know the wiser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. Joe Liebermann is one of the briefers....blind leading the blind
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
14. That is a very obvious answer. Anyone who just pays a little attention to the issues knows this.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
18. She's nothing more than a cheerleader, There's no depth to her at all
I'm sure her good looks and charm went over well in Alaska, no one dared ask too many questions or demand too much because, well, she's cute you know. But put her on the national stage and under a microscope and what's really there isn't too appealing. Sarah is very much an empty suit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CAG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
19. But she practiced saying that name all week!!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chloroplast Donating Member (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
20. Palin studied Journalism?
You've got to be kidding me. She shrank away from a man that's basically her colleague. I can't believe THIS is the best the GOP could do this year; their ticket is Dumb and Dumber: Political Edition and they're proud of that fact. God help us if these two boobs get elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. It looked good on her resume for Miss Wasilia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
21. Ambiguous subject line - from what I understand Iran doesn't have nuclear weapons.
Are you talking about their abandoned nuclear weapons project?

Are you saying the nuclear weapons are still under development and Iran's CIC is in charge of it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. See sub-thread starting with post #8
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
22. I believe the term is "nukular"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC