Lucy Goosey
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 10:55 PM
Original message |
Should Obama come out tomorrow and say that "wives are off limits"? |
|
I know that there is the further issue of John McCain's own ass-covering, but maybe Obama wins some points by saying that he sympathises with Cindy and she should not be raked over the coals?
Thoughts?
|
marylanddem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 10:57 PM
Response to Original message |
1. No. Wives who break the law are not off limits. |
stckyfngz
(11 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
you know they'd do it to us
|
MrModerate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 10:58 PM
Response to Original message |
2. At minimum, he should instruct his surrogates to not touch the issue. n/t |
casus belli
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 11:00 PM
Original message |
We don't need to go there... |
|
this is easily one of those cases where they immediately turn it around and try to get it to stick. And besides, I really don't see it resonating with any but a small contingent who, in all likelihood, are part of McCain's base.
|
emilyg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 11:28 PM
Response to Original message |
scheming daemons
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 10:58 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Nobody associated with his campaign should TOUCH this |
mitchum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 10:59 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Actually, that would be a very savvy thing to do |
Richardo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 10:59 PM
Response to Original message |
5. He's already said very plainly that families are off-limits - at least twice. |
|
And I think it's the right tack.
I see it as another distraction from the REAL issues that will affect ALL of us - economy, war, energy, etc. Compared to those issues, and how McCain/Palin will mismanage them, Cindy's addictions mean nothing. Who cares?
|
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
15. Well--the fact that McLame did a lot of interfering to cover it up is a problem. |
|
It's like Palin's Troopergate--family squabble that should have remained a family squabble, but instead turned into an abuse of power issue connected with her position.
|
elkston
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 10:59 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Naah. Just let it ride in the media and don't say anything. (eom) |
EarlG
ADMIN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 11:00 PM
Response to Original message |
7. I don't think Obama has to go anywhere near it |
|
It's on the front page of the Washington Post. The Obama campaign can just sit back and watch, assuming it gets legs. No comment is necessary.
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 11:00 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 11:00 PM
Response to Original message |
9. No--he shouldn't mention it at all, unless someone asks directly, and THEN |
|
he should say it's not appropriate for him to comment on.
|
old guy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
tomnjoy
(204 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-08 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
truthisfreedom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 11:00 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Sure. Perfect timing, with the WAPO front-page article on Cindy destroying so many people's lives |
|
trying to cover up her addiction.
|
Ichingcarpenter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 11:01 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Getting a diplomatic passport is almost impossible ...John got her one |
|
to hide her addiction......
Abuse of power by John.
|
AllentownJake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 11:01 PM
Response to Original message |
|
He should than make a statement on the need for more rehab centers for other families so more people can get help in this situation and never speak of it again and instruct all surrogates to not mention it.
|
LooseWilly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 11:01 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I don't think the Obama campaign itself will pile on. He/they have too much class.
McCain and his ilk, on the other hand, have shown no compunctions about attacking spouses.
I think Obama should just ignore it for a day or two... and then say that wives are off limits.
In the mean time... it would be very satisfying to see Cindy dragged over the same coals that her Hubby has been flinging at Obama.
|
Curtland1015
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 11:02 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Wives ARE off limits. However, their law breaking husbands... |
|
...are NOT.
If this whole issue is true, then Johhny boy should get nailed to the wall. No reason to mock his wife, but if he broke the law, then he should certainly get called for it.
|
LooseWilly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 11:03 PM
Response to Original message |
16. Down By Law quote just occurred to me... |
|
"You trwoa de ball a' me, I trowa de ball a' you."
|
marlakay
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 11:03 PM
Response to Original message |
17. If she wasn't rich and a senators wife she would be in jail now |
|
what about all of us? kind of reminds me about paris going to jail...i think if cindy had a few weeks there her life would have changed.
|
PA Democrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 11:05 PM
Response to Original message |
19. No. It is not Obama's place to tell the WP what they can and cannot publish. |
|
He and his campaign should say nothing about the story.
|
Lucy Goosey
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
|
I just fear that this is somehow going to be spun as the Dems attacking Cindy, and maybe he should just cut that off right away.
He will be asked about it, though, so he can't completely pretend it isn't happening. By rights, this should disqualify McCain, but we can't count on that.
Anyway, this is a really interesting discussion.
|
melody
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 11:07 PM
Response to Original message |
20. If she can be arrested for it which impacts directly on her spouse, no |
|
That is stuff we need to know. It's not ten years ago, it's now.
|
rgbecker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 11:09 PM
Response to Original message |
21. We're talking potential first lady here. Read the New Yorker article. It's freaky. |
catnhatnh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 11:10 PM
Response to Original message |
22. Yeah-call me silly, but if he did... |
|
John McCain would attack him for being sexist AND partisan in ignoring AND failing to protect Sarah Palin's family, since she has no "wife" but HAS a spouse...see now how the game is played???
|
JimWis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 11:17 PM
Response to Original message |
24. We should not touch this - |
|
And I would suspect that if Obama is asked about it, he will just offer his sympathy. The wife is off limits. Even if he doesn't touch it, I would not be surprised if some idiot republicans blame him for this being released now during the campaign.
|
stillcool
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-08 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #24 |
30. It isn't about Cindy McCain.. |
|
it's about John McCain's penchant for covering up his own and others criminal acts.
|
Barack_America
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 11:28 PM
Response to Original message |
27. He should decline to comment on it at all. |
|
And his surrogates should do the same.
|
angee_is_mad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-08 11:47 PM
Response to Original message |
|
when the repubs (and yes some dems during primary) were unjustly attacking Michelle.
He also mentioned it this week about families should be off limits. He doesn't need to keep saying it every week.
|
stillcool
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-08 12:17 AM
Response to Original message |
29. Husbands who cover up for their wife's |
|
criminal behavior by abusing their power are definitely on the table.
|
Beaverhausen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-08 12:29 AM
Response to Original message |
32. this is about McCain himself helping with the cover-up- it's not just about Cindy |
SweetieD
(517 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-08 12:30 AM
Response to Original message |
FrenchieCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-08 12:30 AM
Response to Original message |
|
That would be the perfect move.
|
wisteria
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-08 12:31 AM
Response to Original message |
35. I think we should leave the wives alone.I know they do it to us, but |
|
this addiction incident is in the past and she has over come it. You have to have some sympathy for people who have addictions. It is old news and I don't think it adds anything to Obama's message of changing the tone in Washington.
|
eshfemme
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-08 12:32 AM
Response to Original message |
36. Yes, he should say this but the media shouldn't listen to him because they need to do their job |
|
Obama will never go down in the dirt like that but that's it.
|
justiceischeap
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-08 12:33 AM
Response to Original message |
37. Would that mean we couldn't diss imPalin anymore? She's a wife. (eom) |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:41 PM
Response to Original message |