Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should Obama come out tomorrow and say that "wives are off limits"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Lucy Goosey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:55 PM
Original message
Should Obama come out tomorrow and say that "wives are off limits"?
I know that there is the further issue of John McCain's own ass-covering, but maybe Obama wins some points by saying that he sympathises with Cindy and she should not be raked over the coals?

Thoughts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. No. Wives who break the law are not off limits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stckyfngz Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. agreed
you know they'd do it to us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. At minimum, he should instruct his surrogates to not touch the issue. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
casus belli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:00 PM
Original message
We don't need to go there...
this is easily one of those cases where they immediately turn it around and try to get it to stick. And besides, I really don't see it resonating with any but a small contingent who, in all likelihood, are part of McCain's base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
26. Agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nobody associated with his campaign should TOUCH this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. Actually, that would be a very savvy thing to do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. He's already said very plainly that families are off-limits - at least twice.
And I think it's the right tack.

I see it as another distraction from the REAL issues that will affect ALL of us - economy, war, energy, etc. Compared to those issues, and how McCain/Palin will mismanage them, Cindy's addictions mean nothing. Who cares?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Well--the fact that McLame did a lot of interfering to cover it up is a problem.
It's like Palin's Troopergate--family squabble that should have remained a family squabble, but instead turned into an abuse of power issue connected with her position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elkston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. Naah. Just let it ride in the media and don't say anything. (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EarlG ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. I don't think Obama has to go anywhere near it
It's on the front page of the Washington Post. The Obama campaign can just sit back and watch, assuming it gets legs. No comment is necessary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. No--he shouldn't mention it at all, unless someone asks directly, and THEN
he should say it's not appropriate for him to comment on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old guy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
25. Bingo!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomnjoy Donating Member (204 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #9
31. Agreed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. Sure. Perfect timing, with the WAPO front-page article on Cindy destroying so many people's lives
trying to cover up her addiction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. Getting a diplomatic passport is almost impossible ...John got her one
to hide her addiction......

Abuse of power by John.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. Yes
He should than make a statement on the need for more rehab centers for other families so more people can get help in this situation and never speak of it again and instruct all surrogates to not mention it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
13. I'm thinking NO.
I don't think the Obama campaign itself will pile on. He/they have too much class.

McCain and his ilk, on the other hand, have shown no compunctions about attacking spouses.

I think Obama should just ignore it for a day or two... and then say that wives are off limits.

In the mean time... it would be very satisfying to see Cindy dragged over the same coals that her Hubby has been flinging at Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Curtland1015 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
14. Wives ARE off limits. However, their law breaking husbands...
...are NOT.

If this whole issue is true, then Johhny boy should get nailed to the wall. No reason to mock his wife, but if he broke the law, then he should certainly get called for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
16. Down By Law quote just occurred to me...
"You trwoa de ball a' me, I trowa de ball a' you."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marlakay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
17. If she wasn't rich and a senators wife she would be in jail now
what about all of us? kind of reminds me about paris going to jail...i think if cindy had a few weeks there her life would have changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
19. No. It is not Obama's place to tell the WP what they can and cannot publish.
He and his campaign should say nothing about the story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucy Goosey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. See, I agree that
I just fear that this is somehow going to be spun as the Dems attacking Cindy, and maybe he should just cut that off right away.

He will be asked about it, though, so he can't completely pretend it isn't happening. By rights, this should disqualify McCain, but we can't count on that.

Anyway, this is a really interesting discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
20. If she can be arrested for it which impacts directly on her spouse, no
That is stuff we need to know. It's not ten years ago, it's now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rgbecker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
21. We're talking potential first lady here. Read the New Yorker article. It's freaky.
Newyorker.com.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catnhatnh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
22. Yeah-call me silly, but if he did...
John McCain would attack him for being sexist AND partisan in ignoring AND failing to protect Sarah Palin's family, since she has no "wife" but HAS a spouse...see now how the game is played???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimWis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
24. We should not touch this -
And I would suspect that if Obama is asked about it, he will just offer his sympathy. The wife is off limits. Even if he doesn't touch it, I would not be surprised if some idiot republicans blame him for this being released now during the campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #24
30. It isn't about Cindy McCain..
it's about John McCain's penchant for covering up his own and others criminal acts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
27. He should decline to comment on it at all.
And his surrogates should do the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angee_is_mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
28. He already did
when the repubs (and yes some dems during primary) were unjustly attacking Michelle.

He also mentioned it this week about families should be off limits. He doesn't need to keep saying it every week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
29. Husbands who cover up for their wife's
criminal behavior by abusing their power are definitely on the table.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
32. this is about McCain himself helping with the cover-up- it's not just about Cindy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SweetieD Donating Member (517 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
33. yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
34. Yep.
That would be the perfect move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
35. I think we should leave the wives alone.I know they do it to us, but
this addiction incident is in the past and she has over come it. You have to have some sympathy for people who have addictions. It is old news and I don't think it adds anything to Obama's message of changing the tone in Washington.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eshfemme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
36. Yes, he should say this but the media shouldn't listen to him because they need to do their job
Obama will never go down in the dirt like that but that's it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
37. Would that mean we couldn't diss imPalin anymore? She's a wife. (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC