Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Evidently the talking points today are

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:22 AM
Original message
Evidently the talking points today are
Charlie Gibson is a liberal :rofl:

and

Charlie Gibson is a raging sexist :rofl:

Charlie you should have asked tougher questions. They were going to attack you know matter what because she's not ready for primetime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. OMG!
He is one of the biggest softballers out there.

What would she have done if it had been Tim Russert?

Start crying?

Jesus...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Seriously I've never seen the GOP play the victim before to this level
this is actually entertaining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChimpersMcSmirkers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. The pukes are getting really close to making MsMooseMufins look like a complete farce.
Crying wolf on the libral media and faux outrage are wells that you can only go back to but so many times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. Entertaining AND destructive to their image
Remeber, they're the ones who are supposed to be TOUGH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemzRock Donating Member (824 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
3. I would like to see her against Olbermann. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. That would be entertaining and would last one minute
Name the bill of rights would be a good first question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. don't believe that will happen in this lifetime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Not Olbermann---Maddow n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. She wouldn't understand Maddow's questions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lukasahero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. :) Indeed! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Excellent point.....
but then again maybe that is another good reason to have Maddow do it!

They couldn't complain about male sexism, but I'll bet they'd complain about lesbianism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. Olbermann, Maddow, Hartmann, Schultz, Rhodes, take your pick!
It would be a bloodbath any way you look at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
4. GMA had Carville and Tori Clark on this am...
Carville gave her C- and Clark said that Dems would think she was horrible and repubs would think she did great. Depends on which crowd you're talking to:eyes:

Tori Clark said some would say Charlie was asking tough questions, but Bryan (is that his name?) said something to the effect of "Charlie shouldn't ask the tough questions," and Tori said, "oh, definitely he should, but I'm just saying...."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Charlie didn't show her DEFERENCE!
DAMN you Charlie you are in the Prescence of the runner-up to Miss Alaska 1984. Bow to royalty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
11. Never mind the Moose in the Headlights look to the bu$h doctrine questions
Never mind the lousy PREPARED answers

Never mind the threat of war with Russia

Never mind the dumbest remark about foreign policy experience "I can see Russia from Alaska"


It is all Gibson's fault for not asking the really tough questions that we all want to know the answers to.:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. Really tough questions???
Edited on Fri Sep-12-08 10:13 AM by POAS
That's the spin, but is it the reality? I don't think so!

Edited to add:

She can see Russia from Alaska? Does that make astronauts experts on Russia? They could see the whole damned place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
17. But is he a pig? And, if so, does he wear lipstick?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC