Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama is losing Ohio-by Paul Hackett

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 10:30 AM
Original message
Obama is losing Ohio-by Paul Hackett
Edited on Fri Sep-12-08 10:31 AM by kpete
Obama is losing Ohio
by Paul Hackett
Fri Sep 12, 2008 at 07:48:58 AM PDT

Obama is losing Ohio and contrary to Mr. Plouffe’s assertion that Obama can win without Ohio history indicates otherwise.

There are at least three issues that lead me to believe that the Obama campaign does not grasp the situation in Ohio.

1. Unreliable polling

2. No organized presence in Southern Ohio

3. No attack strategy against Palin/McCain coupled with a lack of defense of the Obama central theme of change.

.............

(HACKET suggests the following attack - I felt uncomfortable when I read it - what do DUer's think?, kpete)


The message is simple and the professionals can refine it but essentially it should contain these elements:

Sarah Palin? Can't keep her solemn oath of devotion to her husband and had sex with his employee. Sarah Palin? Accidentally got pregnant at age 43 and the tax payers of Alaska have to pay for the care of her disabled child. Sarah Palin? Unable to teach her 16 year old daughter right from wrong and now another teenager is pregnant. Sarah Palin? Can you trust Sarah Palin and her values with America's future? John McCain? Divorced from his first wife one month and marries a billionaire influence peddler and convicted felon. John McCain, a record of rash and impulsive decisions. That’s not change that’s more of the same."


more at:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/9/12/104315/182/935/596046
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think his attack is disgusting and counterproductive. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thestrugglecontinues Donating Member (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. If they use this attack as outlined
It will result in a McCain landslide of Mondale proportions. I hope someone at HQ has a clue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #16
45. Wrong
Mondale lost because he was the nicest, biggest puss of a politician the Democratic party had put up in 100 years. Humans are basically just a bunch of baboons, literally primates. The electorate, over the last 70 years has voted on fear, consequently nice doesn't cut it. People vote with their gut and need a reason to vote against McCain not for Obama. Even McCain's legendary temper will be an asset to him if people are frightened more of a black man than terrorists, Russians, global warming, lead paint etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #45
55. dems need to ATTACK MCCAIN, to attack palin with that ad will give them victory
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hasssan1 Donating Member (439 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #55
59. Amen . i have been saying this for 2 fucking months. POSITIVE CAMPAIGN WON'T GET YOU ELECTED AGAINST
REPUBS. you don't take knife to a gun fight .


LEARN FROM HISTORY !!!!!! GOSHHHHHH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VeraAgnes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #16
82. Paul Hackett surely has moxie style
Oh yes...........don't let Obama pull a Kerry. I like this soldier, Paul Hackett.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
34. True,but it's the kind of TMZ politics a lot of voters are responding to
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. No organized presence in Souther Ohio?

I read they had 57 offices opened in Ohio.


Unreliable polling. We know that the polling does not reflect increased voter registration among the young and higher turnout with the AA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PermanentRevolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
21. Actually, there quite possibly may not be
Anecdotal, I know, but I have a friend who just moved up there. He works a union shop in S. Ohio, on the West Virginia border, and he's constantly defending Obama from the guys he works with. Note that these are union-members registered as Democrats making these attacks, not right-wingers. They're all repeating the "secret Muslim" crap and swear they won't ever vote for a black man. If that's indicative of local Democrats, then it's probably best to concentrate on other parts of Ohio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #21
41. Wasn't that supposed to be on Biden's to-do list?
Isn't he supposed to be the guy that visits the union locals in the rust belt to convince these guys that, despite his color and funny name, that Barack is one of the guys?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #41
56. wish we had the equivalent of their 'rosie the riveter' ad n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
22. Ohio is moving Obama, this is counter programming folks.
Edited on Fri Sep-12-08 11:04 AM by Boz
Skewed internal perspective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kukesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
25. I live in Dayton.
We have a huge Obama office downtown. Another one is opening north of town, in Trotwood. I've volunteered to help two Obama coordinators who are working south of town, sans office; they're meeting at a condo clubhouse. DUer "sad one" has been canvassing for the south group.

VolcanoJen lives in the Cincinnati office. I hope she responds to this message because she's impressed with the Obama organization in her area (Jen isn't impressed easily).

Both Jen and I worked for K/E in 2004; their organization was a joke compared to what's going on here in southern Ohio right now.



:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
44. "Uunreliable polling"? - Hackett has no clue as to what Obama's internal polling says.
Internal swing state polling is very accurate compared to public polling by questionable sources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaryninMiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. I agree with Hacket- but the attack should come from a women's oriented 527-
not from the campaign itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. I hate this kind of stuff
but I KNOW people who are unfortunately swayed by it.
So many see elections as sporting events or gotchas.

peace, kp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. I'll hate it when we've won our second or third national general election with such tactics
For now I'm fine with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
85. I agree... Every word of Hackett's is True.... and these GOP bastards are destroying America....


Give them the truth they so rightly deserve.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MyNameGoesHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
4. Well I don't know but i am hoping the concern police
make an example of Hackett because there is no way Obama could lose anything. He is a concern troll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. I don't think Hackett is plugged into the campaign internals.
and he's dead wrong about the Obama ground game.

There's outposts in red areas - including my county.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kukesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #5
30. "Outposts" is a good word, Several south of town, too. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #30
42. You have to check out Downtown Troy
you'll poop when you see Obama HQ!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RNdaSilva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #42
71. According to....
http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/ohoffices it would be somewhere in this area.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #71
74. Nope. They're right on the square.
I'll take a pic and post it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kukesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #74
77. Hurry up; I can't wait. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murbley40 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
6. If Obama did this,
how would we be able to tell the difference between him as a democrat and McCain and Palin as Repubs. This would not be a ticket I would want to vote for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenEyedLefty Donating Member (708 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
8. Even though true, it's way too harsh.
Edited on Fri Sep-12-08 10:38 AM by GreenEyedLefty
There's enough from the candidates themselves to go on, there is no need to delve into the spouses and families.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
9. Hackett must be another "concern bot"
lets not pay him any attention at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
10. Sleazy. NT
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
11. Haccket is a good name for this writer .. i would suggest maybe he shorten it to just hack
no organized presence? 50+ offices and no organized presence? Yea right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Hackett is a good Democrat
he's run for office, a Iraq war veteran. Personally, I think he knows what he's talking about
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. that
is why I gave him a listen, although I did not like what I was hearing, still don't.

peace, kp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #14
23. If he was such a brilliant campaign strategist, I would think
he could have taken down that vile Jean Schmidt character...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #23
49. Actually, that was one of the reddest
Edited on Fri Sep-12-08 12:54 PM by tomg
districts. It was a special election in 2005. First time i ever sent money to someone besides my own rep. I remember watching all night long when he ran. It was up on DU at the time. He was actually ahead something like 51 to 49. Then, magically, something happened to the computers,she was ahead. He got diebolded. The final was something like 49 to 51. The past had been runaways for the republicans since 1974. He ran a kick-ass campaign. I think after that he wanted to go for a senate seat and didn't get the nom. Actually, they recruited him to up against her in 2006 and I think he would have hammered her, but that is when he tried to get the senate nom.

While I do not agree here, the guy is good, a solid dem, very hard hitting, and I hope we see more of him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #23
52. By a strange twist of fate, my good friend's sister married Hackett's brother.
Edited on Fri Sep-12-08 12:57 PM by CTyankee
So my friend has observed him up front at family occasions and she says he's a total asshole. This friend is a great person and she doesn't go around attacking people. But he disgusts her. Plus, she thinks he's full of hot air and primarily concerned with self promotion. I'll take her word any day...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #12
24. He's a good Democrat who has run for office and is a vet
Edited on Fri Sep-12-08 11:10 AM by melody
But the simple fact is the non-internal polls (I'm assuming he means, by "unreliable polls", the internals because how would he know about other polls?) indicate Obama is ahead in Ohio ... except for Quinnipac. Has anyone seen differently?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #24
61. You've got it backwards
Quinnipiac is the only recent poll that does show Obama ahead in Ohio, the others have McCain up.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/oh/ohio_mccain_vs_obama-400.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #61
79. Thanks, I haven't checked Ohio for a few days
It's amazing how quickly it moves. Thus, it will return to normal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
48. He lost. And now I know why.

This is obviously a bad strategy. They're already claiming Obama is unfairly attacking Palin.
Attack her on the issues, not on family matters. Duh. Thanks goodness Hackett isn't
working for the campaign. Er, perhaps that's why he's so "concerned".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
60. Not too long ago he was a DU HERO.
Then he wasn't, then he was again. I guess now he's NOT.

You know how fickle DU can be.

:rofl:

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VeraAgnes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
83. Me too.
I have PTS from Kerry's weakness in Ohio...........I'm in Western Pa. and got ill from the cold shoulder Kerry gave Ohio. Let's not be too hasty and discount this wise op-ed article. Let's process the points given. he just gave a rough draft too, as he acknowledges.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
15. It can't hurt to step it up in Ohio.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kukesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #15
27. Here's the map of Ohio showing
Obama's offices.

http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/ohoffices

These are official offices; lots more coordinators working in this state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #27
36. By step it up, I mean give a major speech on the economy from OH
or something like 'at. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kukesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #36
39. Great idea! I'll be there. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #15
58. Lay off Palin...ATTACK MCCAIN...label him elitist, out of touch, etc...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regularguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
17. Ugh. Awful. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
18. Jobs and Nafta --take it or leave it.
Can Obama stand up to the Corporatists(some are even in our own party).
The Nafta lovers were not too happy with Hilary. This is the only way
Democrats can win Ohio. You cannot just promise. They have been burned
in the past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
19. Hackett's assertion about no Southern Ohio presence is a bold-faced lie!
I see Obama volunteers all over the place down here. There are several offices opened here.

And he is absolutely fucking nuts if he thinks Obama should go after Palin with such a hideous personal attack. WTF is his problem??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #19
43. Interesting...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
20. The attack contains some lies that have been debunked already.
If that exact attack were run verbatim, it would rebound against us. There is a more accurate list of attack phrases we could use.

For example-- she didn't have an affair with her husband's business partner. That was a rumor only.

and

Complaining that Alaska taxpayers will have to pay for her disabled child's care is gross. I want free medical care for all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalyke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #20
47. How do you know she didn't have an affair.
The NE says she did and they're right about gossip far more often than they're wrong.

The NE isn't going to break an expose on Gitmo or the Iraqi War, but gossip they know and they're the masters at it.

Besides, they were right about John Edwards - and that's a recent feather in their cap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:11 AM
Original message
history has
shown that you can't win the GE w/o Ohio

(for that matter, history also shows that a candidate cannot win Ohio in the general if they have not first won it in the primaries....only 3 exceptions total on record, for both parties)

this sounds consistent with other stuff i've seen

makes NO SENSE to IGNORE

it will certainly not hurt if we assume it's accurate and ACT on it

FIRST STEP:

FRAMING, and following advice of the 4 stories......

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AldebTX Donating Member (739 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
26. Any One Think They WANT Obama Attack
Just so they can say he is Angry.

I want him to stay on message and let his surrogates do the attacking.

I do feel he needs to respond to the personal attacks...ala the teaching kindergartners sex before reading
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
28. He's Going TOO EASY On McAngry and McMoose
These nutbars will probably start World War III if they get in!

McCain has serious anger-management issues
and Palin would do it to bring on the "Rapture"!



The original "Daisy" ad. The most effective political ad ever made.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OKs-bTL-pRg

I think it's time to make another.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
29. I definitely think his ideas for attack are STU{ID and will BACKFIRE
the rethugs will deflect ALL criticism of Palin

especially the rumored affair

they ADMIRE her late pregnancy

we must go after MCSAME

another post has an article with some good ideas for going after McCain, using FRAMING
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
31. I agree and disagree with Hackett's view
He's correct that Obama is losing Ohio. He's wrong, though, on using the adultery allegations. There's no need to make use of them when we 1) already have footage of Sarah speaking nonsense about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac; and 2) Mayor Palin's rape-kit policy. Those two things should be turned into snappy TV ads, and broadcast to as many local markets as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
32. agree with the article, but disagree with his specific attack ideas n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
33. Here's a map of the Ohio offices. I am sick of all the 2nd guessing.
http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/ohoffices

This board is front and center to hurt Obama, just like is was to hurt Dean during the 04 primaries. Only then no one did a thing about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
35. I think that the first sentance tells me what I need to know
"history indicates otherwise"

You have to win a lot of states to win the presidency. And every one of them would like to be the exceptional "must win" state who controls our fate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SurfingAtWork Donating Member (788 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
37. I can't believe they passed over this whiz when they were staffing the campaign
If they had this guy we'd be up by like, over 9000!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
38. Paul Hackett is a loose cannon to the max
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
40. Hackett really doesn't know what he is talking about....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
46. if hackett is so smart, why isn't he in the congress?
this is the kind of shit that lost him his own races.

this is horrid bullshit. and there is no way the obama campaign is coming anywhere near it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
50. His "strategy" is horrible. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abbiehoff Donating Member (356 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
51. I think the point is
Edited on Fri Sep-12-08 12:55 PM by abbiehoff
that Southern Ohio is definitely McSame territory, and many people here are very impressed by Palin. They aren't going to be aware of anything about her other than what she has said herself. Most of the impressed would be horrified to hear anything negative about her; they don't think anything negative exists. They aren't watching MSNBC or seeing DU or KOS or Huffington. They are "values" voters who admire her comments about religion and abstinance only and "thanks, but no thanks" and such.

No, I don't think the campaign should address any Palin negatives other than her position on the issues. But clearly the anti-Obama 527s have no trouble spreading lies and filth. I would very much like to take the high road, but the low road seems to win elections.

The best that could come of this approach would be to keep some R voters at home on election day.

on edit: BTW Paul Hackett is a great guy. I think he's just tired of seeing the other side get away with their lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
53. talking about the taxpayers having to pay for her disabled child would be INSANE
That's so stupid there aren't enough words in a thousand thesauruses to describe it. Not only is it... well, just gross to refer to a child as if he were nothing but a financial liability, but caring for people with extra needs is one of the things that liberals are pretty darned okay with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
54. well, since Paul Hackett was one of DU's heroes
a couple of years ago, it's going to be interesting to see DU's reaction to this.

I imagine he'll join a long list of others under the bus.

---------------


You know, the tactics he describes are exactly the sort of crap that the Republicans do. And it works for them, time and again. The Republicans understand that it's a fairly small group that you need to appeal to in order to win elections - everyone else already has their mind made up. This kind of garbage politics appeals to that group - these are exactly the sort of questions these people want answered when it comes to the candidates. They don't care about issues - they care about what they see as character. The Republicans understand that the key to winning is to destroy your opponent's character.

And Hackett is right about Ohio - we need to win Ohio if we want the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
57. Hackett you believe this strongly. Make an ad for Ohio work with move on you can help us.
Edited on Fri Sep-12-08 01:04 PM by barack the house
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Holly_Hobby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
62. I'm in Toledo
There are no Obama yard signs or bumperstickers, except mine, that I've seen. McCain signs and bumperstickers are absent too. Toledo is normally blue.

There have been no campaign people knocking on my door. This is really unusual at this point in elections.

I do some phoning for the campaign, but due to medical problems, I can't canvas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
63. and Hackett has won what, exactly?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
64. This makes me very uncomfortable too.
IMHO, the "BRUTAL" ad (http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=385x187917) by Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund would be better in Ohio.

It's not even a close call to me. Why try and alienate the voters you should be trying to woo.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
65. Just keep pounding her. We can bring that up later, if we have to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
66. Making the other guy look even worse is a good way to counter racism and political inertia
Edited on Fri Sep-12-08 02:25 PM by depakid
That said, it ought to have been up to the 527's to spread the word (since my guess is that few know) about McCain's past and what it says about his character.

The real gift that was squandered in Ohio- that might still be resurrected, was Phil Gramm's comments early this summer that Americans are whiners and the economic devastation in states throughout the rust belt is "all in their heads."

If McCain's elected, this guy- one of the architects of the meltdown- will likely be Treasury Secretary and make their lives exponentiall WORSE.

Couched as a very straightforward fear appeal and repeated over and over (alongside McCain's admission that he doesn't know anything about economics) would have been a very powerful message and presaged a VERY clear (and honestly scary) choice.

Whther he campaign can pull that bit (and other more recent ones like it) from the memory hole and use them effectively from now until the election, is anyone's guess. One hopes so- though impressions of candidates once they're defined to the voters, are more difficult to change. Sure would have been easier to have pounded that material early on, while it was in the news cycle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
67. Why are we posting these things here? This makes no sense. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grassfed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
68. go for it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladywnch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
69. I have a hard time believing this is Paul Hackett's writing. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
70. Also at dkos: "A reply to Paul Hackett: Obama Organization in SO"
But Paul Hackett's Diary is a substantive misrepresentation. I can't understand how it got on the Rec list...

Let me repeat a few highlights of what I have observed here in Scioto County.

1. For the first time we have an active, organized volunteer effort geared towards the top of the ticket in Scioto County. There was very little GOTV for Kerry (he stil won 47% in the County and took Potsmouth);

2. The Obama campaign has rented a large and constantly staffed office on Chilicothe Street;

3. We have about 20 volunteers committed to canvasing this weekend and are still getting more;

4. When we talk to base voters, they are with us.


http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/9/12/125659/694/729/596260

I think any ad which can't be proved is a bad idea. Remember: Trust Barack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
72. That suggested attack is the last thing Obama should do.
That even made me cringe.

I like Paul Hackett, but I don't when he became such an authority on political campaigns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trudyco Donating Member (975 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
73. I'm more concerned about caging and vote counting - OH's rep not good
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kukesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #73
76. But this time we have a DEM for Secretary of State. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
75. Here's the Obama link to their offices. Lots of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edgewater_Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
78. Hackett Proved Himself To Be A Hack. Ignore Him.
Remember when people wanted him to re-run against Mean Jean and he said no, his ego demanded he run for the Senate? That move probably kept Mean Jean in office (although Victoria Wuslin should beat her and she'll be better anyway) and showed him to be an egomaniac more concerned about his career than progressive causes.

Even Sam Seder -- who was behind him back in THE MAJORITY REPORT days -- abandoned him, and for me that's enough proof to tell him to stuff it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
80. Wrong on many levels.
First, the attacks would backfire. I'm all for going on the attack, but this harsh personal life shit will just rile up the fundies.

Secondly, we really don't need Ohio. Not saying we shouldn't try to get it, because to get it would be a guaranteed victory, but in no fucking way does he have to have it. To win, Obama needs any one of OH, FL, CO, VA or MO. McCain needs all of them plus NV.

Thirdly, Obama is not losing Ohio. He's neck and neck in Ohio after closing a sizable gap.

Fourthly, from the sounds of it, he's got a pretty good presence in southern Ohio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Lane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
81. Attacks on Palin are fine but not *these* attacks
Keep exposing her as a liar about earmarks and the Bridge to Nowhere. Add in her billing the State for per diem charges for time she spent (chose to spend) at her own home. These are things the average voter can understand. They'll cut away at her image as a reformer.

Sarah Palin: Pork-barrel spending as usual. Culture of corruption as usual.

Of course, this deserves less emphasis than attacking McCain, which in turn deserves less emphasis than promoting Obama/Biden, as the ticket capable of delivering real change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
84. I say "Go for it"
We're not planning a picnic, here - we are fighting for the very heart and soul of America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rg302200 Donating Member (495 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
86. Not True...
I live in S.E. Ohio, Guernsey County to be exact, and we have had our field office up and running for well over 2 months. We have made thousands of phone calls and have canvassed every weekend. We have been more organized and productive than the Republicans and they know this. In fact they haven't even got their local McCain field worker here yet. The shit in the OP is nothing but flame bait!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC