Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Help a non hunter out here would you? Wolves, is hunting them just for sport?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 10:58 AM
Original message
Help a non hunter out here would you? Wolves, is hunting them just for sport?
i really don't know.

Please and thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. I don't think they're hunted for food (like deer)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. In Some Areas,
it is a matter of predator control. They can be a danger to humans and domestic animals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. so when they show the shooting from the plane and the wolves out in the snow is that why
they're killing them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. But that is NOT why they are hunted in Alaska. They are hunted to boost game animal populations.
Which is a lousy reason to shoot wolves, because a top predator is nature's way of keeping animal populations healthy by killing off weaker animals. And no, hunters cannot fill the same role. They tend to take the biggest and best - with the exact opposite effect on game animal populations. Hunters also tend to want to take males for trophies, which is not as nearly as effective at preventing overpopulation as taking females. Wolves are more likely to take weaker females and young, smaller weaker males as opposed to the mature large, strong males sport hunters take (exactly the wrong thing to do from the standpoint of herd genetics).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
17. Only if humans move into their habitat. Humans are "spciesists"
We think that our shit is much more important than any other species out there. Kill for fun, kill for convenience, basically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demmiblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. Population control... to maintain the food web.
I.e. humans trying to take the place of Mother Nature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. And to protect the tourist dollars, er, the species that people want to kill for sport. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. But wolves do a better job of "maintaining the food web" than human hunters do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demmiblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. I agree...
hence, "i.e. humans trying to take the place of Mother Nature."

I guess I should have said controlling Mother Nature for their own purposes and benefits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libertypirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
5. They exterminate them
Seems to me like a bunch of assholes who just want to get their gun off!

These people aren't hunters they are exterminators who get off on shooting shit.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katandmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. BINGO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malta blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. in this case, they are hunted because of the fact
that the wolves prey on moose and other large animals that are considered substinence for the hunters in the area. So basically, Palin likes moose stew and the wolves are getting in the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
8. In Alaska, they're being killed to increase the moose/elk/caribou numbers
for big game hunters--hunting is a big tourism attraction there. Maybe a DUer in AK would dispute this, but that's what I read RE the aerial hunting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
9. All hunting is just for sport. It's the thrill of the kill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. No, I have lived in areas where what you hunted was what you ate.
And if you didn't get anything, you didn't eat, meat, at least.

I wouldn't want to hunt, myself, but I would if I had to in order to eat. And if the hunter is ethical it's a lot more humane than a lot (most, probably) of the slaughterhouses.

An argument could be made on a lot of levels for going vegan, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. And those wolves are mighty tasty eating. Particularly the right front legs.
Hunting wolves is either for sport or misguided notions of protecting game animal populations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. Yes, but the person I was replying to said *all* hunting.
Edited on Fri Sep-12-08 12:06 PM by tbyg52
I was going to leave that at "nt," but now that I think of it I kinda resent your replying to something I didn't say, and apparently not reading what I did say.

How 'bout you go do what I just did (*before* seeing your reply, I might add) to demonstrate that you don't support the aerial wolf hunting and are happy Palin is being called out on it....? ;) :hi:
http://www.defenders.org/support_us/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
15. Wolves are natural predators of Caribou, Elk, etc - the animals Palin likes to kill
Edited on Fri Sep-12-08 12:04 PM by Beaverhausen
and hang their heads on her walls. So if they get rid of wolves, more game for cowards like Palin to shoot.

It's sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
16. They're hunted at the pleasure of ranchers.. who hate them.
Wolves probably kill a small number of livestock.. but the demonization of wolves has resulted in FUN killing of them. No one EATS wolves.

Humans seem to believe that every fucking species in this world is here for their convenience. And if an animal, in their natural habitat and behavior, doesn't do what humans want.. well.. they kill them.

And, apparently, for the bloodthirsty, chasing an animal the size of a dog around in an airplane or helicopter, then shooting them when they drop from exhaustion -- is considered FUN!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
18. In most states, it's largely about predator control - by ranchers
and sheepherders protecting their livestock.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slampoet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
20. As a former hunter/gatherer and cook of weird foods, nobody who isn't starving to death eats Wolves.
Edited on Fri Sep-12-08 11:25 AM by slampoet
I have seen some pretty weird game animals prepared, muskrat (called "Swamp Rabbit"), Nutria, squirrel, beaver, raccoon, bear, snapping turtle, but I have never even heard of a hunter preparing a wolf or any other wild canine as food. I've never heard of a starving person doing it either.

I have cookbooks for 100's of wild edibles and game. Some of these cookbooks date back to 1850 so they contain things that we just don't eat anymore. For example I have 30 recipes that deal with turtle eggs.

I don't have single recipe for Wolf.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
21. There is a short article in Field & Stream which might get you started...
Edited on Fri Sep-12-08 11:31 AM by SteveM
Of course, F & S is a major publication for hunters and fishers, but they try to keep up with the issues. High lights:
(1) The gray wolf (there are other species) has gone from a population of perhaps 2 in 1979 (Montana, Idaho, Wyoming) to around 1,531 as a result of its endangered status and re-introduction.
(2) "...the three states must each maintain a minimum of 150 wolves or 15 breeding pairs (a "pack" is one breeding pair plus its offspring and nonbreeding adults), and each state's federally approved management plan aims for at least that -- while incorporating hunting."
(3) Montana has already established hunts but "Baits, scents, lures, hounds, night hunting, and aerial gunning or spotting are illegal." Idaho allows killing "...the animals on sight if they're harassing or attacking livestock or pets."
(4) "Sierra Club and Defenders of Wildlife -- promised that within 60 days of delisting they would file suit in federal court against the USFWS for violating the ESA." These groups claim that 2,000-5,000 wolves are needed for "full recovery."
(5) "Eventually, though, sportsmen in the Northern Rockies should expect to experience true wolf hunting, as opposed to predator control."

This last point gets to your "just for sport" question. Clearly, for most people do not eat wolves, so killing one for "sport" would probably result in a trophy skin. (By contrast, I hunt deer, birds and small game for sport AND I eat them as well.) This goes to the question of why folks hunt, it is a very complex set of emotions embedded in our hard-wiring. I don't like some forms of hunting, but most of the time, these differences don't rise to the occasion of yet another prohibition. So, yes, there will be sport hunting of wolves wherein, perhaps, only the skin will be retained. Most all sport hunting conforms to game and other wildlife management, so don't expect a big out-pouring of hunters willing to put up with the hardships imposed on them. As the writer Thomas McIntyre aptly states: "Wolves have never been sitting ducks."

www.fieldandstream.com June, 2008, Departments, Experts, News "It's Almost Wolf Season," Thomas McIntyre
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
22. Under Palin they shot wolf PUPPIES in their den which is ILLEGAL.
Then, they tried to mount a cover up, because they knew that people would be outraged. Sensible hunters do not hunt any animal during the season when mothers are nursing their young just because you know that you will end up killing mothers raising infants.

This was not a "hunt" in a sportsmanlike manner. It was a slaughter using helicopters. Palin knows nothing of true hunting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slampoet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
23. BTW. Nobody who hunts from a plane is a Sport hunter.


Hunting from Airplanes is the kind of thing that isn't just illegal it is the kind of thing sooooo Illeagal that they have International Treaties against the practice.

Sara Palin didn't either was ignorant of this, or she just didn't care about the international policy of the federal government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tallahasseedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
25. Why does
she have a bounty of $150 on the right leg of the wolf? What do they do with it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC