Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What Gibson Missed Entirely?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
TheCoxwain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 12:57 PM
Original message
What Gibson Missed Entirely?
It was bad enough that Ms.Barbie did not know what the Bush Doctrine represented... but even after Gibson spelled it out for her , Her response was that she would take unilateral action if the threat was imminent.

The Bush doctrine has nothing to do with imminence. It has to do with a threat that 'may' become real some day ... Even at the height of propaganda for the Iraq war Bush , Cheney did not suggest that a threat was imminent .... but still argued for unilateral Military action .. That is what makes the Bush Doctrine such a radioactive idea ..


Why did Gibson not press for an answer with a smart follow-up question? Did he feel sorry for her? Was he too worried that he would come across as beating up on her?


I dont care - we deserve answers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. In his defense he tried, but she kept spewing the same incoherent mess at him..
he said her answer got buried in a "blizzard of words", so he asked her yes or no, then she buried him again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Especially about Israel --
He asked her the question differently three times in a row to try to elicit a direct reply, but she answered each time with THE SAME response:
"Charlie, we do not second guess Israel..." THREE TIMES! I posted a video of it here. There's only so much you can do if someone refuses to answer - and he did far better than I'd dared hope.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I don't see how she gets through the debate..
Edited on Fri Sep-12-08 01:27 PM by Virginia Dare
she's in way way over her head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. That's exactly the main impression I took away from this interview --
she's in WAY over her head.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jctw769 Donating Member (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not as important as her not knowing. He was worried too.
He was under just as much of a microscope as she was. The idea that that is just as important as her ignorance is just like the idea that we should be subject to continued smears and false outrage by the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. Cenk pointed out that he had the perfect opportunity to ask "So was America
under imminent threat from Iraq?" That would have been great!

All in all, Charlie did good. Better than a lot of others would have done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC