Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tonight's ABC tidbit: Palin still insists she never supported Bridge to Nowhere

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 03:20 PM
Original message
Tonight's ABC tidbit: Palin still insists she never supported Bridge to Nowhere
Edited on Fri Sep-12-08 03:27 PM by BeyondGeography
Gov. Sarah Palin made sure Friday that the Republicans party's conservative base heard loud and clear that it when it comes to traditional platforms like cutting wasteful spending, she's on their side.

She characterized needless projects funded by American tax payers and supported members of Congress as "embarrassment."

"It has always been an embarrassment that abuse of the ear earmark process has been accepted in Congress. And that's what John McCain has fought. And that's what I joined him in fighting. It's been an embarrassment, not just Alaska's projects. But McCain gives example after example after example. I mean, every state has their embarrassment," she said.

Palin said she opposed earmarks and defended her own record as the former mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, which received around $27 million in federal funding and her decision to first back and then withdraw support of the so-called "Bridge to Nowhere."

The governor withdrew support of the bridge slated to be built with $398 million in federal funds to a small island with just 50 residents after the project became synonomous with wasteful government earmarks.

When pushed by Gibson for supporting the bridge and then opposing it, Palin said she never fought for the bridge but was instead in favor of money used to improved Alaska's infrastructure. The state still received the federal funds even though the bridge project was nixed.

"I was for infrastructure being built in the state. And it's not inappropriate for a mayor or for a governor to request and to work with their Congress and their congressmen, their congresswomen, to plug into the federal budget along with every other state a share of the federal budget for infrastructure," she said.

Palin told Gibson that she "drastically reduced our earmark request since I came into office," but when pushed on her states request for $3.2 million for researching the genetics of harbor seals and the mating habits of crabs, the governor became defensive.

She said funding those projects were requested publicly and not hidden in legislation...



http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/story?id=5787748&page=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is this follow up just internet text- or is it something swingvoters will see on their TVs tonight?
Edited on Fri Sep-12-08 03:26 PM by Dr Fate
When you say "tonight's tidbit"- it almost sounds like it's going to be a major story on TV that a lot of people will see- is it?

I see a pattern here where DUers are presenting various network blog posts and internet text as if it is on TV where swing-voters & low info voters might see it- I think we need to make the distinction where appropriate...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. It will be on tv. Just like the "tidbits" posted here yesterday were on tv. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Glad to hear it- thanks for making this clear.
i'm sure we can agree that there is a huge difference between what networks put on their websites and what they actually put out onto the airwaves for low-info voters to see...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. No problem. They release bits of the interview that's to be aired tonight-just like they did
yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Republicans have never done the "I made a mistake" thing
They will continue a lie even when everyone knows its a lie because the MSM refuses to mock them for it like they do with Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. She might as well have been opposed to the bride since
Congress had already taken it out of the bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oviedodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. proof once again she is an idiiot, what she shoudl have said back when she was running if
she was really a reformer was:

"We need help for our infrastructure, BUT that bridge is not one of them".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. She DID oppose it - after Congress cut the funding for it...
and it was clear that it would never happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Thread title changed to better reflect the issue at hand
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Either way, it's an obvious lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. So she went along...the anti-Maverick!
Edited on Fri Sep-12-08 04:19 PM by earthlover
Just call her for what she is....a flip flopper!

But anti-Maverick does have a ring to it.

F it. just call them both liars. And hypocrites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. Who turns down free money--that's just crazy!
Especially for a politician. It's preposterous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. Even had Palin been telling the truth about the bride decision,
what's the big deal. The bridge had already become one of the biggest earmark scandals in recent history. Anyone with an IQ of at least 80 would have known to back away from it. The bride was one
of Ted Steven's projects and it failed to sneak under the radar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChimpersMcSmirkers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Exactly. MsMooseMuffins kept the cash, all $300 million.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. They lady was trying to pad her resume with every little thing
she could think of including the bride and the airplane deal. (The airplane was a 35 year old borderline piece of junk that the state had been trying to sell since before she was governor.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
14. Palin is a white condi Rice... lie and deny!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC