Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Palin admits to being earmark abuser

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 12:24 PM
Original message
Palin admits to being earmark abuser

GIBSON: Governor, this year, requested $3.2 million for researching the genetics of harbor seals, money to study the mating habits of crabs. Isn't that exactly the kind of thing that John McCain is objecting to?

PALIN: Those requests, through our research divisions and fish and game and our wildlife departments and our universities, those research requests did come through that system, but wanting it to be in the light of day, not behind closed doors, with lobbyists making deals with Congress to stick things in there under the public radar. That's the abuse that we're going to stop. That's what John McCain has promised over and over for these years and that's what I'm joining him, also, saying, you're right, the abuse of earmarks, it's un-American, it's undemocratic, and it's not going to be accepted in a McCain-Palin administration. Earmark abuse will stop.

The abuse that they are going to stop is the earmarks that she, herself, requested this year? It's nice of her to admit to being a pork abuser, like McCain admitting Thursday night that he's out of touch. But I suspect this wasn't part of their game plan.

Of course, that's what McCain gets for putting the nation's biggest pork abuser on a ticket campaigning on stopping such abuse. And Gibson didn't tiptoe around the issue:

GIBSON: But you turned against after Congress had basically pulled the plug on it; after it became apparent that the state was going to have to pay for it, not the Congress; and after it became a national embarrassment to the state of Alaska. So do you want to revise and extend your remarks.

PALIN: It has always been an embarrassment that abuse of the ear form -- earmark process has been accepted in Congress. And that's what John McCain has fought. And that's what I joined him in fighting. It's been an embarrassment, not just Alaska's projects. But McCain gives example after example after example. I mean, every state has their embarrassment.

GIBSON: But you were for it before you were against it. You were solidly for it for quite some period of time...

<...>

GIBSON: The state of Alaska, under OMB figures in 2008, got $155 million in earmarks for a population of 670,000. That's $231 per person in Alaska. The state of Illinois, Obama's state, got $22 per person. You got ten times per person as much. How does that square with your reforms?

PALIN: We have drastically, drastically reduced our earmark request since I came into office.

GIBSON: But you still have multiple of any other state.

PALIN: We sure are -- and this is what -- you go out and you ask any Alaskan this. This is what I've been telling Alaskans for these years that I've been in office, is no more.

Incoherent. I can't believe the GOP dug up someone that makes George Bush look like a genius.

::
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/9/13/13522/6191
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ladywnch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. PALIN: We have drastically, drastically reduced our earmark request since I came into office.
I think that's a lie as well. Anyone have the stats on this? I'm pretty sure I heard they increased under her.

anyone....?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. okay, what's up with Gibson, he sounds like a journalist.
what's that all about, i'm confused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msallied Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bwahahahaha! Damn, Charile! You bit her!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. The people of Montana should be pissed
McCain and Palin singled out Montana for earmarks to study wild life genetics, the exact same things Palin herself has pushed as earmarks for Alaska. But Montana was abusive and trying to scam the people, while Alaska was righteous in its requests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. I am very pleasantly surprised at Charlie Gibson.
He took it right to Palin and left tread marks. Great job. :headbang:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC