pdxmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-14-08 10:43 AM
Original message |
Today's Repuke talking point...Obama has voted with his party almost |
|
100% of the time. And watching Bill Richardson defend Obama on that on Wolfie's show made me want to scream. This seems to be an easy one. Of course he's voted with the party. The Repukes have been dead wrong...look at the state of this country. The Repukes have been obstructionist and we can't get anything done with their wrongheaded decisions. He needs to own it, and lay it back on the Repukes just plain ol' being wrong.
|
progteacher
(6 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-14-08 10:45 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Republicans cannot govern...it's this simple |
my3boyz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-14-08 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. But the evil @ssholes win elections! nt |
Frosty1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-14-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
11. They don't win them they steal them! |
Bluzmann57
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-14-08 10:45 AM
Response to Original message |
2. That's not even original |
|
Obama and others have said that McCain voted with bush 90 pct. of the time. So once again, the repubs are stealing a talking point.
|
NJmaverick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-14-08 10:47 AM
Response to Original message |
3. The point is Obama isn't a member of the screwed up Republicans |
|
he didn't have to vote against them to be right.
|
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-14-08 10:49 AM
Response to Original message |
4. You'd have to be stupid to vote against your party when your party is right. |
Canuckistanian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-14-08 10:52 AM
Response to Original message |
|
He voted with his party 100% of the time? Scandalous!
Even if it were true, so what?
Republicans have either filibustered or vetoed any Democratic bill or amendment.
Is the public happy with the way things are going?
|
pdxmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-14-08 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. Exactly. But Richardson didn't have any response to the "charge" Pawlenty |
|
said "Name one time Obama stood up to his own party." Richardson waffled around. It was embarrassing.
|
firedupdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-14-08 10:54 AM
Response to Original message |
7. Why shouldn't he? We've been right 100% of the time in the last |
caraher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-14-08 10:59 AM
Response to Original message |
8. As usual, the RW talking point deliberately misses the point |
|
Obama is not the candidate trying to distance himself from his own party. McCain is the one painting himself as a "maverick," and his voting record puts the lie to that claim.
The whole point of the McCain criticism is that he does not promise change, he is McSAME!
|
kimsterdemster
(237 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-14-08 11:04 AM
Response to Original message |
10. easy come back line... |
|
he voted against Bush 100% of the time.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:58 AM
Response to Original message |