Jade Fox
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-14-08 12:14 PM
Original message |
My new comeback to those defending Palin..... |
|
"Gee, you sound just like you did a few years ago when you were defending Bush. And we all know how well that turned out. I was right about Bush, and I'm right about Palin."
|
BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-14-08 12:16 PM
Response to Original message |
1. The electorate voting for someone BETTER than themselves... |
|
Would mean they would have to face up to how worthless they are. Hence the attraction of voting for people as small and stupid as the electorate.
|
blm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-14-08 12:17 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Very simple and very true. |
Jade Fox
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-14-08 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
6. The defenders of Palin seem to have completely forgotten... |
|
how recently their judgment turned out really badly. When I read their posts on the internet, they sound JUST like they did when they were saying we were just obsessive Bush haters, etc. etc.
|
JBoris
(675 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-14-08 12:18 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Exactly. I use an argument like this all the time, very effective. nt |
Jade Fox
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-14-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
I just thought of it, reading wingnut posts on the internet and thinking, "I bet three years ago this person was writing this same kind of post about Bush!"
|
JBoris
(675 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-14-08 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. Another variation to use on undecideds/low-info voters... |
|
All the same people Rush, O'Reilly, Hannity, and all of the same friends and co-workers who told you to vote bush/cheney, they are now telling you to vote McCain/Palin. They are telling you that Obama is a muslim terrorist, liberal elitist or the devil. They are telling you that Palin is just like you, and McCain is a "maverick" and an agent of change. Why would you believe any of them? I then usually go on ranting about all of the lobbyists and bushies in McC's camp and how Palin is a liar and an extremist nutjob who thinks "the Flinstones" was a documentary, and how they both want to go to war with Russia. That usually works pretty well too.
|
Jade Fox
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-14-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
12. You have to wonder..... |
|
Edited on Sun Sep-14-08 01:01 PM by Jade Fox
how many times Rush, Hannity, etc. have to be proven WRONG before their fans will start to doubt them. It's some sort of really strange disconnect.
|
salin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-14-08 12:19 PM
Response to Original message |
|
If nothing else... it allows a teeny weeny seed of doubt to be planted.
|
graywarrior
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-14-08 12:20 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I need a line like that while I'm canvassing.
|
Ishoutandscream2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-14-08 12:32 PM
Response to Original message |
8. "But, but, she's not the presidential candidate111" |
|
Yeah, but she is one heartbeat away from taking office. And her boss is a 72 year old, cancer survivor.
|
Jade Fox
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-14-08 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
13. One of the creepy things the Palin nomination has done..... |
|
is create the impression that the Vice-president of the USA in some sort of apprenticeship/companion position.
The "Trophy Veep" syndrome.
|
CrispyQ
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-14-08 12:47 PM
Response to Original message |
senseandsensibility
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-14-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message |
|
She's exactly like chimp. But that comeback is the kind that works with that crowd.
|
treestar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-14-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:52 AM
Response to Original message |