Blue_Roses
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-08 10:18 AM
Original message |
I don't understand why these polls numbers continue to be close. Who in the hell are they polling??? |
|
Edited on Mon Sep-15-08 10:20 AM by Blue_Roses
I live in Texas and I have never seen such disgust with this administration. Topping that off, I have talked to several people in my mother's RED district (she lives in assisted living) who think Palin is a joke and see through her lies. I was getting gas the other day and had a conversation at the pump about this. Everytime I get gas, I get pissed off, so I guess I look like a crazy person as I mumble to myself, yanking the damn pump around to my car. Another lady was on the other side (I didn't notice her) the other day and she said, "this is ridiculous". I said, "no shit." These damn prices go up and down more than the roller-coaster ride at a amusement park.
So that brings me to the original question. Who the HELL are they polling? I see Obama stickers and signs everywhere. What the fuck is going on :argh:
|
YOY
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-08 10:24 AM
Response to Original message |
1. People who usually vote. |
|
That's who they poll.
First time and irregular voters don't count.
Lesson: They're full of shit.
|
Terran
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-08 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
22. There will be millions and millions |
|
of new/first-time voters in this election, and virtually of them will be voting Democratic. I think the pubbies are in for a Very Nasty Surprise.
|
YOY
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-08 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #22 |
23. Let just hope they don't get discouraged. |
Terran
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-08 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
26. Most of them don't read DU obsessively |
|
So they're probably ok. :toast:
|
glowing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-08 10:26 AM
Response to Original message |
2. I think they call the same list over and over again.. and that they are all |
|
fundies or they are lying about talking to anyone...
|
GoldenOldie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-08 10:27 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Don't believe they are close |
|
Think the CON's are again using the MSM and the phony pollsters in an attempt to once again steal an election. If they can cage the vote, manipulate the machines, etc,. to reflect a McCain/Palin, then they will use these polls to justify the accuracy/theft.
|
EnviroBat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
Right on. We are being played...
|
catbyte
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-08 10:27 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I live in western Michigan in the red part of the state. I've seen Obama yard signs outnumber McCain signs 12-1, and not just in my little blue oasis near downtown Grand Rapids. I don't know who the hell they're polling either, but I've never seen such overwhelming support for a Democratic candidate for President. They can't all be "Bradley effectors"!!
Diane
|
NorthwestNut
(45 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-08 10:27 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Even the most recent polls tend to lag 3-4 days, plus the new voter registration thing (of which I am one).
|
wowimthere
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-08 10:28 AM
Response to Original message |
6. it's to create perception to steal the election... You have a right to question |
grace0418
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-08 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
14. Exactly. First, it discourages people who think no matter what they do nothing will change. |
|
Second, it gives a convenient cover story for election fraud. "Well, the polls have been neck-and-neck the whole time. McCain just came out on top."
We've got to keep people from getting discouraged AND overcome the election fraud.
|
Teaser
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-08 10:31 AM
Response to Original message |
7. we are trying to elect the first black president |
|
did you think it would be a blowout?
|
bdamomma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-08 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
just remember Obama made 66 million dollars in August that means alot, people are not going to have 4 more years of crap.
|
Blue_Roses
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-08 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
12. well fuck no, I didn't expect it to be a blowout, especially since I live in the south... |
|
but these numbers reflect something totally different than what ACTUALLY is being said in REAL TIME America!
|
Mz Pip
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-08 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
20. I think this election |
|
is more about this than anything else. Given the direction that the McCain campaign is taking its ads, it's really obvious to me they they are playing the race care. They want people to be afraid of Obama, mistrustful of Obama. McCain is the great white hero who will save this country. Obama, well, we get the message.
I think it's dispicable and if McCain wins because of these tactics it will further polarize this country on racial and ethnic lines. McCain is no uniter. Palin is a redneck from a very white state. When women scream, "She's just like me!!" it's about more than just the gender.
|
Avalux
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Obama raised a record amount and had half a million news donors last month. The race isn't even close.
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-08 10:38 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Seriously. Far right states are skewing the national polling.
|
Upton
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-08 10:42 AM
Response to Original message |
11. I've got a novel idea |
|
maybe, just maybe it's a close race.
BTW, yard signs and bumper stickers are not indicative of anything. If they were, we would be inaugurating Pres. Ron Paul in Jan.
|
Blue_Roses
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-08 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
13. oh give the condescention a rest...yes, I know it's a close race and Palin has made it closer |
|
with her rhetoric, but when you have an interview that bombed the way hers did and the complete and utter bullshit that the McCain camp is being called on--even by Karl Rove--either the polling is lagging a few days or...
|
Tarc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-08 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
15. Its hard not to be condescending when you're this naive |
|
There's a solid base of backwoods Bible-belters that swooned over Ronnie Raygun, and have passed down their inbred ignorance to their children who are taught that anything connected to a "D" is a bastion of communism and homosexuality and depravity.
I'm sorry, but all the "hope and change" in the world was never going to be able to penetrate this solid rock of a base that they have. They will not be swayed by Palin's fuck-ups and obvious inexperience.
If you want Obama to win, we have to hold onto our own and convince the sensible middle-grounders to swing back this way. And be willing to take the gloves off to do it.
|
Blue_Roses
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-08 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
17. while I'm sure you made an attempt at an honest explanation... |
|
the "it's hard not to be condescending" doesn't surprise me coming from you.:eyes:
|
Tarc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-08 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
24. And the fact that you're, in fact, naive |
|
isn't a surprise to anyone here, either.
|
kansasblue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-08 11:08 AM
Response to Original message |
16. They are corporations. Should we trust them? It's about money. nt |
El Fuego
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-08 11:13 AM
Response to Original message |
19. How can telephone polls be accurate these days? |
|
First, they are only probably only calling land lines. I personnally only use my land line for my DSL connection. Many people don't even bother having land lines.
Second, they're talking to people who actually answer their phone for a unidentified caller AND spend time with an unidentified caller.
Who are they people the pollsters are reaching? People without cell phones, without caller ID, who obviously have plenty of time on their hands. The kind of people who are are always getting duped by telephone solicitors because they'll believe anything. Naive people. Dim-bulb not very smart people. In other worlds, people who vote republican.
|
windbreeze
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-08 11:18 AM
Response to Original message |
21. Let's put it this way....$66,000,000 and 500,000 new donors... |
|
need anyone say anything more about polls??.. wb
|
SeaLyons
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-08 01:08 PM
Response to Original message |
25. Thom Hartmann talked about polls today on his show... |
|
says they cannot be accurate, and how concerning it is that the media is reporting them.
|
Overseas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-08 01:28 PM
Response to Original message |
27. Sometimes they poll equal numbers of Ds, Rs and Is |
|
They poll around 30% each, even though there are millions more registered Democrats across the country.
|
Overseas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message |
28. Check out ProSense article about Gallup admitting McSame bias. |
|
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x7075425 About a deliberate decision by Gallup and USA Today to release a McSame post convention bounce poll because it was so much more favorable to him than any other poll ever, but not to release any post convention bounce poll on Obama. ========== And here's some background on Rasmussen from DarthDem http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x7075374
|
loyalsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-08 02:22 PM
Response to Original message |
29. Who doesn't raise their voice? What do you hear? |
|
Consider the low level participator. There are voters who are fed up but who do not like to talk politics (they hang up on pollsters). They take that position because of their jobs or because they do not like confrontation. They may mutter in front of strangers, but they don't want their spouse to know their opinion. Their opinions are not reflected. Some are adament and at home they argue with the spouse. When you run across them, they have a different opinion. Who answers the phone when the pollsters call? Who worries that there may be records of the poll that get around?
There are people who do not have phones because they are poor. Some don't have phones on record because they have moved. The college students who only use cell phones.
There are real life immeasurable dimensions to consider that are not reflected in the polls.
For the conspiracy buffs, if the pollsters and media were "in" on anything, don't you think they would be making it look like McCain was walking away with it so that we would give up?
We need to work hard. This race is not going to be a cakewalk. Why would it be?
But there's no reason to get desperately discouraged. There are voices that are not measured and there are actual legitimate reasons why. Think it through and you may sleep easier before getting up and heading down to headquarters for your next volunteer day.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:16 AM
Response to Original message |