darius15
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-08 05:30 PM
Original message |
PENNSYLVANIA: OBAMA 47 MCCAIN 47 |
ryanmuegge
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-08 05:31 PM
Response to Original message |
1. At this rate, I'll be happy if Obama can hold Illinois, New York, and California. |
|
Edited on Mon Sep-15-08 05:33 PM by ryanmuegge
I'm hoping that we can get enough of a majority in the legislature to change the rules so that we can win the White House once in my lifetime.
|
margotb822
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-08 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Please tell me that is sarcasm |
|
PA has gone Dem in the last 4 presidential elections. If they voted Dem for Kerry in '04, I'm confident in them this year. And, besides Rasmussen/FOX polls? Really?
|
Hope And Change
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-08 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
BlueIdaho
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-08 05:35 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Rapture Rasmussen strikes again! nt. |
dennis4868
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-08 05:38 PM
Response to Original message |
5. I thought I saw a recent |
|
non-Rass poll that had Obama ahead in PA....hmmmmm...
|
ErinBerin84
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. uh, like every PA poll so far |
|
PA is going to stay blue, even if it "tightens".
|
SteelPenguin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-08 05:41 PM
Response to Original message |
6. If I had any faith in polls it's now gone |
|
No way McCain is tied in PA. Skewed 'likely voters' numbers leads to this. PA alone has registered something like 300-400 THOUSAND new democratic voters this year, but of course none of them would count in one of these polls.
PA will not go red this year. No chance in hell. Sorry.
|
Teaser
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-08 05:41 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 17th 2024, 09:00 PM
Response to Original message |