Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John McCain took pride in calling himself the DeRegulator?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 12:37 PM
Original message
John McCain took pride in calling himself the DeRegulator?
Edited on Tue Sep-16-08 12:38 PM by Skwmom
Did I just hear this right? I just walked into the room so I want to make sure I heard that right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe the *other* McCain.. You know the one from 2001
who wouldn't vote for the McCain of 2008 . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. And he flip-flopped on who he is and what he believes in less than a hour. Check it out.
Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) appeared on all six broadcast and cable morning news shows today in an attempt to defend his misguided belief that the “fundamentals of our economy are strong.” In discussing the causes of and solutions to the current economic crisis, McCain appeared to flip-flop — in less than an hour — on the role and effectiveness of government regulation.

On NBC’s Today Show, McCain told Matt Lauer:

Of course I don’t like excessive and unnecessary regu — uh, government regulation.

But on CBS’s Early Show, McCain told Harry Smith:

Do I believe in excess government regulation? Yes. But this patchwork quilt of regulating bodies was designed for the 1930s when they were invented.

With regard to the current economic crisis, the McCain campaign is now arguing for “strong regulatory oversight of Wall Street.” McCain, however, has long held that he is “fundamentally a deregulator.” As he told the Wall Street Journal in March:

I’m always for less regulation. But I am aware of the view that there is a need for government oversight. … But I am a fundamentally a deregulator. I’d like to see a lot of the unnecessary government regulations eliminated.

Later that Month, McCain said in a speech, “Our financial market approach should include encouraging increased capital in financial institutions by removing regulatory, accounting and tax impediments.” ThinkProgress documents McCain’s long history of flip-flops here.

VIDEO at the link

http://thinkprogress.org/2008/09/16/mccain-flops-on-regulation/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. He was a mess this morning, all over the place..
and on top of that he was his usual arrogant and snippy self, not likable in the least. His campaign is unraveling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Median Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. My God! I Feel Dumber For Trying To Sort Through That!
Does John McCain do that on purpose or is he confused himself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ps1074 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. Gramm-Leach-Bliley Deregulation Act
Edited on Tue Sep-16-08 01:09 PM by ps1074
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, also known as the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Services Modernization Act, Pub. L. No. 106-102, 113 Stat. 1338 (November 12, 1999), is an Act of the United States Congress which repealed the Glass-Steagall Act, opening up competition among banks, securities companies and insurance companies. The Glass-Steagall Act prohibited a bank from offering investment, commercial banking, and insurance services.

Economist Robert Kuttner (among others) has criticized the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act as contributing to the 2007 subprime mortgage financial crisis. Economists Robert Ekelund and Mark Thornton have made similar criticisms, arguing that while "in a world regulated by a gold standard, 100% reserve banking, and no FDIC deposit insurance" the Financial Services Modernization Act would have made "perfect sense" as a legitimate act of deregulation, under the present fiat monetary system it "amounts to corporate welfare for financial institutions and a moral hazard that will make taxpayers pay dearly.

Someone should remind the Maverick that he voted for this deregulation in 1999.

Here is the actual vote:
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=s1999-105
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC