|
Hey everyone - 9thkvius here. I got this e-mail today from a friend who is actually not a big fan of McCain/Palin, but who had received this from his brother. I wish I had a longer and more intelligent response, but I am a bit pressed for time today. Ay constructive criticism is much appreciated.
First, the original e-mail.
You couldn't get a job at McDonalds and become district manager after - 143 days of experience.
You couldn't become chief of surgery after - 143 days of experience of being a surgeon.
You couldn't become a journeyman plumber after -143 days of experience
You couldn't get a job as a teacher and be the superintendent after - 143 days of experience.
You couldn't join the military and become a general after a - 143 days of experience.
You couldn't get a job as a reporter and become the nightly news anchor after - 143 days of experience. BUT....
'From the time Barack Obama was sworn in as a United States Senator, to the time he announced he was forming a Presidential exploratory committee, he logged 143 days of experience in the Senate.
That's how many days the Senate was actually in session and working. After 143 days of work experience, Obama believed he was ready to be Commander In Chief, Leader of the Free World.
143 days.
We all have to start somewhere. The senate is a good start, but after 143 days, that's all it is -- a start.
AND, strangely, a large sector of the American public is okay with this and campaigning for him. We wouldn't accept this in our own line of work, yet some are okay with this for the President of the United States of America ? Come on folks, we are not voting for the next American Idol!
Please, please forward this before it's too late!
And here is my response - 9thkvius
Ah, where to begin.
Obama certainly does not have a lot of experience on the national stage, but he does possess a pretty keen mind, a strong sense of intellectual curiosity, and the sense to listen to people who know more about various subjects than he does. He strikes me as someone who likes to read and likes to learn. I dare say that most of the people he has picked to give him advice are pretty goddamn smart, especially on the two most critical fronts: economics (Robert Reich, Paul Voelcker, etc.) and foreign policy (Samantha Power, General Clark, and of course Joe Biden, his running mate).
Considering who McCain picked to be his running mate, this argument is a joke. If 143 days as a Senator are not a whole lot, then what about a few years running a town that might as well be the set of Northern Exposure? Or being the governor of one of the least populated states in the entire goddamn country? After watching her give a couple of speeches, plus the interview with Charlie Gibson on ABC, I am rapidly coming to the conclusion that she is one of those people who refuse to fucking learn anything. She acts as if there is nothing that anyone can teach her. She just follows her gut, and all those silly facts and figures shouldn’t get in the way. It is very reminiscent of George W. Bush, and I dare say that is not a path we should try to go down again. I don’t want anyone else’s gut trying to run the country, especially when that gut clearly has shit for brains. And look who the fuck is giving her advice: on foreign policy, it’s people like Robert Kagan, Randy Schueneman, William Kristol, and Joe Fucking Lieberman. What do think these neoconservative assholes are telling her? Probably stuff like “sure, we can start another war. Those Iranians are pussies.” And the only thing that scares me more than the McCain/Palin foreign policy advisers are their economic advisers. Sorry, but getting financial advice from some supply-side Kool-aid drinking hardcore lobbyists like the Pfotenhauers does not strike me as a good idea. And it only gets worse from there. Do you really think that Carly Fiorina and Phil Gramm are the people that should be giving the McCain/Palin ticket economic advice? A CEO who drove her company into the ground, and the guy who is almost singlehandedly responsible for the banking meltdown going on right now? Hell, look at what is happening with UBS since Gramm jumped on board, and then look at the other Swiss banks who didn’t jump on the mortgage securities bandwagon in comparison. “One of these things is not like the others, one of these things does not belong.” UBS just wrote down a few more billion dollars (I think their total losses are somewhere around $40 billion now), and they probably aren’t done yet. Much of that is due to Gramm and his policies that the UBS board enacted. Is THAT a guy you want to take financial or economic advice from?
So ultimately, if the choice is between a smart person who has little experience but good advisers, and a person with their head up their ass with little experience with shitty advisers, who are YOU going to pick?
|