Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Framing: It's not "deregulation", it's "Playing without any rules."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:05 PM
Original message
Framing: It's not "deregulation", it's "Playing without any rules."
Republicans want the wealthy to be able to play any games they want with our money, without any rules at all.

How would that work in football?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's like removing weight classes in boxing
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 06:09 PM by anonymous171
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think we're already seeing how it works
And it ain't pretty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. There's a word for "no rules:" anarchy.
Republicans are anarchists!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronopio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. "No rules" in football would mean "no competition" and "no game".
Each team could declare themselves the winner and not play. Or buy out all of the other teams.

The idea that works is that rules are written to ensure the state of competition for the purpose of ensuring the continued benefits of competition.

It's like nuclear fission - if competition is not carefully managed, the process expends itself.

Of course, what the rules should be and who makes/enforces them are more advanced questions, but as a nation, America hasn't gotten to answering the basic ones yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC