Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Help me out here - I went to Arizona State

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rufus dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:23 PM
Original message
Help me out here - I went to Arizona State
It is no Harvard or Stanford, but hey at least it isn't University of Idaho.


Anyway I need some help with logic. Fox and Dobbs are pushing that the meltdown is Clinton's fault. Clinton signed a deregulation bill written by and approved by Republicans, except for one vote by a Democrat. Clinton left office almost eight years ago and for the first six years all of Gov't was controlled by Republicans. Can anyone logically explain, or even give a semi literate opinion on how this can be tied to Clinton. Seriously.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why do you hate America?
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rufus dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I have to admit
For the past couple of weeks I have hated about 45% of the electorate in the USA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Aw, that's only if you believe the polls. I don't believe a word of them.
I don't answer my land line unless I recognize the phone number. Could be a telemarketer. Could be a pollster. I'm sure a lot of people are like me. The people responding to the polls are those who don't care if they're speaking to a telemarketer. So the numbers of real voters vs. "I'll talk to a telemarketer" people are skewed to start with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Clinton and the other dem were the only ones who voted yes...
Every other Dem was against it. It was a Republican bill. They wanted it and Bill Clinton being a good moderate Republican assented. So how does this absolve the Republicans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. "He didn't fight our assinine ideas hard enough!!!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rufus dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Shouldn't that be the point made by the talking heads?
Come on, it is something that shouldn't be open to debate, but they are going to use it as a diversion. One Democratic Senator, no longer in office, voted yes, the Repukes, including McCain all voted yes. It was written by a chief McCain economic adviser, END OF STORY. With the added zinger, "this is why things are so messed up, you don't take responsibility for your mistakes."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. Here's the one I read that frosted my ass
I blame Clinton only to the extent he trusted these assholes and didn't make sure all of his economic policies were written with solid measures to protect us.

The one that really gets me is that it's Clinton's fault because he encouraged programs to help people in minority neighborhoods to buy, in order to correct the red line policies of the past. First it was the poor people's fault, now it's the minority's fault. That's the line that's going to stick - if we don't get three words out there right now - Gramm-Leach-Bliley.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. Are we having a McSame's staff meeting here! ROFLMAO
Lobbyists' good ole boys would have you believe that. There are 7 of them on his campaign committee! Just say'n. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rufus dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. More of a Devils advocate approach.
To me this claim is just so ridiculous and lame but I have a feeling that it will be pushed very hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AldebTX Donating Member (739 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. Because
You have to think like a Repug. If its something bad...it HAD to come from a Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. Talkingpointsmemo Explains: "Republicans and the Credit Crisis"



This seemingly innocuous power point slide from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) was used in June of 2004 to explain to market participants a new ruling on how broker dealers could compute their "net capital". Instead of the previous fixed limits on leverage of 10:1, broker dealers like Lehman Brothers could use their own "internal models" to determine how much leverage they could put on their capital. As we saw with the crash of Bear Stearns and now Lehman Bros., both firms were leveraged more than 30:1.

When you combine this ridiculous willingness to let broker dealers determine their own leverage with the decision three years later to alter the short selling rules to make it easier to short a stock, you have a recipe for financial chaos. These are both Bush administration SEC moves. They stem from a idealogical hatred of regulation. They cannot be blamed on Democrats. This needs to be stated clearly by Obama and Biden.

http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/09/14/republicans_and_the_credit_cri/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
12. Fellow (sister) Sundevil here
What a great place to go to school!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abumbyanyothername Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
13. I will make an effort here, but realize that this is not MY opinion
Clinton has been parading around the country taking credit for the peace, prosperity and balanced budget that marked his administration since he left office (in shame, no less). Leaving aside the peace, the prosperity and balanced budget were forced upon him by a Republican controlled congress that swept into power in '94.

If he wants to take the credit for all the growth and prosperity that flowed from the massive deregulation passed by the Republican congress, he should step up to the plate and shoulder the blame too.

(Again, note that this is just my effort to construct a reasonable argument to support the positions of the people OP is hearing from.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
14. Plenty of other people you could say should have stepped on the brakes along the way.
The deregulation of the financial services sector has been a long process. Even recently when there were very clear signs that the mortgage mess was brewing, Greenspan kept rates low, and even talked up adjustable rate mortgages at a time when rates were near historic lows. People who were sounding the alarm were ignored, and in fact Bush's Office Comptroller of the Currency filed suit against states that tried to enforce laws against predatory lending. The Supreme Court ruled in the OCC's favor overturning consumer protection laws that individual state shad passed.

http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/04/18/news/banks.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC