underpants
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-19-08 10:31 AM
Original message |
Is the Palin smilie sexist? |
Captain Hilts
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-19-08 10:35 AM
Response to Original message |
pnwmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-19-08 10:35 AM
Response to Original message |
2. That's not the Palin smilie. |
Wickerman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-19-08 10:35 AM
Response to Original message |
3. I think it violates her copyright on the "lipstick on anything" deal |
|
so, yeah, since it is damaging to Sarah, it's sexist - cause she should be judged on her own merits, not on her sex. :crazy:
|
johnlal
(974 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-19-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message |
4. The lipstick is OK. The face should be more porcine. nt |
underpants
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-19-08 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. (pauses....shifts to the right) In what respect johnlal? |
johnlal
(974 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-19-08 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
bushisanidiot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-19-08 10:52 AM
Response to Original message |
7. a smilie with a question mark over it's head would be better. |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-19-08 10:52 AM by bushisanidiot
or one with a finger up it's nose.. 'course that could easily be confused with AWOL Bush. heh..
and i agree that a smilie with lipstick on it is probably violating a the copywrite that Palin has on lipstick. :P
|
ellacott
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-19-08 10:56 AM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:14 PM
Response to Original message |