Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Grampa and Barbie on the Economy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 04:32 PM
Original message
Grampa and Barbie on the Economy
:D

Grampa and Barbie on the Economy
By Ruth Conniff, September 18, 2008


The economy is in a meltdown, and John McCain can't figure it out. On the day the Dow tanked and Merrill Lynch and Lehman Brothers fell, he declared that the fundamentals of the economy are sound. Then he had to try to explain his comment away--by "fundamentals" he meant "American workers." Now he is calling for putting "an end to the abuses on Wall Street."

How is that, exactly? On the campaign trail, McCain has repeatedly declared that too much government regulation is the problem. A decade ago, an article in the Washington Post points out, he and Senator Phil "a nation of whiners" Graham teamed up deregulate the financial industry helping to set up the current collapse.

McCain's economic advisers haven't done him a lot of good lately. First Graham had to quit after his "whiners" comment about the country facing a "mental recession." Then, this week, former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina had to cancel interviews after admitting that she didn't think Palin or McCain could run a large company.

Oops.

Bad economic news makes the idea of electing someone who has admitted to knowing little about the economy, and a running mate who knows even less, considerably less attractive.

McCain has clung to the old Republican cut-taxes-and-government-regulation mantra far too long, even as the economic ground has shifted under his feet. His sudden burst of populism on the campaign trail--complaining about "greed" on Wall Street, doesn't change the fact that his tax plan is startlingly regressive--giving only $19 a year in tax cuts to the bottom fifth of taxpayers, and $140,000 to the top 1 in 1000. For the middle class, he offers considerably less than Barack Obama--$319 to Obama's $2,136.

Stirring up the base with a "culture wars" message has worked for the Republicans in the past as a distraction from dull policy debates. But with pension funds losing money, a "psychology of fear gripping investors," as The New York Times put it today, credit drying up, interest going up on mortgages and student loans, and job cuts looming, voters are not feeling quite so distractable.

more...

http://www.progressive.org/mag/rc091708.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC