Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Michigan? We're going to lose MICHIGAN?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:08 PM
Original message
Michigan? We're going to lose MICHIGAN?
is that possible? Or are they talking about voter fraud?

I'm terribly worried about this election but Michigan is not on my radar. . . or just barely on my radar.

I know there are tons of religious nut cases in Michigan, home of religious nut case Amway. But TURN RED? Really?

Talk me down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Great post!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
97. Not so. Doesn't reveal source is editorial by EJ Dione and Chris Cilizza until
farther down the line. I don't like big ambiguous concern posts that don't even have the courtesy to give their sources. Why not say simply that "EJ Dionne and Chris Cilizza are saying Michigan will be a battleground state, and I thought we would clearly win Michigan. I'm worried about that." Then your readers will know what your concern is founded upon.

Instead of that, an urgent panicky question is asked. OMG, talk me down! A really vague hyperbolic concern post with no sourcing.

Yet many sincere people respond with latest poll data showing we lead in Michigan.

Then others share their explanations for what could possibly account for results contrary to those we have all seen, because obviously, having made such a strong declaration, the poster must be referring to some new data we haven't seen yet.

There are several exchanges including those who ask about the source of the writer's concern. And finally, way down the thread, Hamlette finally reveals the source of concern:

It isn't the MSM, it's EJ Dionne and Chris Cilizza (sp)

who say it will be the battleground state this year, like Ohio last time and FL in 2000.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not possible
2004 was the year of the religious nutcase according to the Chinese calendar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endthewar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. That's not behavior we can believe in
:rofl:

Alright, I've gotta come up with a new line. This one is getting kind of stale. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #18
36. How about....
"You are not fooling anyone....TROLL."

:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endthewar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Nah, don't want to accuse you of being a troll
You turn Texas blue yet? Check the national polls to see all of the great work I've done turning Massachusetts blue. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. I must say Texas is a little tricky, but I am working on it.
And as for Mass....GOOD FOR YOU!

:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #38
99. The problem with Texas is it's so damn big and expensive
Jon Cornyn would be well on his way to being an ex-Senator if he represented a smaller and slightly less red state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Its the economy in Michigan.....and yes I've been warning you all for months that Mi. is dicey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. But Why Would The Crap Economy Help the REPUBLICANS Who Broke IT?!?!??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #16
31. Because we have a Dem governor.
Many are blaming her and therefore Dems as well.

Obama's not helped himself here, either, what with the primary debacle and a couple of snippy comments on an earlier visit this summer that got a lot of airtime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. Obama is not here enough. Its that simple. It's going to take a lot of work to
get voters enthused about either candidate. On the up side, I drive the highway every day and I DO NOT see the number of republican bumper stickers I saw in 2000 and 2004.

But I also do not see the Obama stickers much either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #37
48. There are more in our area.
Here in Battle Creek, I'm seeing Obama stickers and signs far more than I would've expected and far more than I saw Kerry stuff in 2004. If those are any indicator, we actually might win Calhoun County.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #48
84. I loved Batle Creek....
It was such a cute town...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #31
53. Let's not lay the primary "debacle" at Obama's feet, OK?
Of all the parties responsible for stirring the ire of Michiganders in regards to the Michigan primary, Obama is LEAST to blame.

That said, the Dem governor has an effect, plus the animosity revolving around the Kwame Kilpatrick situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #53
58. People do blame him, though.
He refused to campaign here, but now he's coming around and asking for money. That leaves a sour taste in a lot of people's mouths. I've heard Dems here say they're not sure about the guy. I'm just saying--how would you feel being treated like that, regardless of the reason?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Levgreee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #58
60. sounds like the legacy of Hillary's smears on Obama....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #60
73. In part, that's true.
He didn't help his case, though, by how he handled his first few visits here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FVZA_Colonel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #58
71. How can that many people really be blaming him if he's up by anywhere from 4 to 9 points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #71
74. He'd be up by more, though.
I'm sure Dems have mostly forgiven him by now and will definitely vote for him, but for our independents on Dem calling lists who get the mailers and phone calls begging for money, I think more would be pro-Obama if he came up here more often and really addressed the primary debacle when he did get here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #58
94. "he refused to campaign here"
My point is that it is unfortunate that people are so misinformed as to exactly what went down in Michigan, and people continue to blame Obama and/or the DNC. Just as with your "he refused to campaign here" statement. The agreement was that NO ONE would campaign in Michigan, because Michigan had broached the national DNC agreement on the order of primaries. Obama is not in any way individually responsible for Michigan's decision, nor the response by the DNC.

Sadly, it appears that far too many people are uninformed and it is the nature of the beast that it is contagious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue_onyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #31
77. I remember a poll from months ago that showed....
more people blamed the economy on Bush than Granholm. Also, yesterday a new poll showed Granholm with a 50% approval rating, higher than usual...especially considering the economy here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #77
81. Thank goodness.
I've heard a lot of negative about her lately, which surprises me, given that the Republicans in the legistlature have stymied any and all possibilities for fixing Michigan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue_onyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #81
83. Yeah, it's nice to hear good news
The problem for Granholm is the news doesn't cover all the games the Republicans in the House (particularly Mike Bishop) play. So people just say, "Hey, nothing is happen so must be the Governor's fault." I think her helping move the process of Kilpatrick leaving office along probably helped her in the poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #16
34. Because the people of Michigan are equal opportunity 'screw you Washington' voters
He who has the most supporters vote wins the game in Michigan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
30. I agree with you I been watching all of michigans blogs and
slowly but surely the liberal voice is being silenced by the wingnut loud braying jackasses. Even strong liberal leaning bloggers are starting to repeat the right lies. They are finding themselves in dead end jobs with little health care then blame the poor for having better health care then they have.

So any debates lapse into why me and not them arguements where even the disabled are seen as low life free loaders to lazy to work. SSI folks are getting nut checks, seems a news paper ran an article about how it was easier to get an SSI check if one has a mental condition then if one had a health problem. The wingnuts claimed they saw people walk into a SS building claiming mental health was keeping them from working and walking out of the building with a SSI check in hand. No debunking happened.

When one see's a blogger that time after time has done their best to debunk this crap start repeating right wingnut crap, all one needs to do is pack up and leave city or state for work 24 hours after they leave. Then you take into account michigans hidden racism, every city in michigan has a black side of town and a white side, though the outer edges are being "invaded" by non whites. Michigan turning red wouldn't surprise me, it happened in 1969 when michigan voted for Nixon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #30
40. Nobody walks into SS and walks out w/an SSI check. I know, I work in that area.
The only way Obama would win in a landslide in Michigan is if or when Michiganders are more pissed off than they are concerned with racial issues.

Michigan residents who have not left the state, who continue to live and maybe work here, are tired. We have had a recession in Michigan for over 7 years. So, only one thing is for sure among Michigan residents as a result of the last few days economic upheaval.

It is this...welcome now, to the United States of Michigan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Labors of Hercules Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #30
51. Wow, that's one sardonic screenname ya got there...
Edited on Sat Sep-20-08 09:03 AM by Labors of Hercules
your just one giant happy pill, aren't you? :P :pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #51
64. After what I been through these last few weeks what can I say, I'm tired of
the people I know from michigan and Ohio repeating the crap, Obama is a muslim that took the oath of office on the Koran who won't wear a flag pin has a muslim flag in his office and has no real experince on running the government. Yet Mcshitforbrains and Moose lady from alaska are both experinced and will change all of Michigan and Ohio's problems.

Meanwhile, everything is the poor caused all of this weeks problems for Wall st, if they had only paid their bills an didn't take out loans on houses they couldn't afford, Wall st would be in great shape. So it's our duty as good american tax payers to bail out Wall st and billionares. Facts be damned these people believe these things just as sure as they believe they can buy a place in the after life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flying Dream Blues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #64
89. Oh and don't forget it was "Clinton who wanted more poor people to have houses and so forced
the banks to offer mortgages to them" So it's not just the poor, but the Clintons... a repuke two-fer!
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
67. And don' forget racism in Michigan. There's some there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #67
75. More than some.
Especially in the rural areas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #67
80. I think that most of that crap is among the older voters, 60's, 70"s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Marist Poll
Released today: Obama up by nine points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
25. Same poll had Obama up 57-35% among Michigan independants....
Another poll today showed Michigan at 50-41. I'm not worried, McCain/Palin isn't an acceptable alternative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannie4peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. if conyers has anything to do with it , we won't :):):)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safeinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thats the west side of the state
The east has more balance. Plus the east side has more voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. huh? BHO is ahead 50-41 as of today on Hardball n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonn1997 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. BHO? That's a new one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #17
44. I'm a lazy typist
sue me

:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shaniqua6392 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. Obama is 9 points ahead here right now!!
I don't know anyone in my family or circle of friends who is voting for McSame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demokatgurrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. Michigan is now 48:45 Obama:McBush
according to electoral-vote.com

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
10. look here now-
Marist: Ohio Tied, Obama Leads in Michigan, Pennsylvania
New polls from Marist College in three key battleground states:

Ohio: Obama 44%, McCain 44%

Michigan: Obama 50%, McCain 41%

Pennsylvania: Obama 45%, McCain 42%
http://politicalwire.com/archives/2008/09/19/marist_ohio_tied_obama_leads_in_michigan_pennsylvania.html

now breath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. ELECTION fraud. They will challenge every voter they can challenge to create ELECTION fraud. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
43. They're even buying lists of foreclosures for this purpose
never mind that people may still be living in their houses while foreclosure proceedings are going on. :grr: :banghead:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=3481019&mesg_id=3481019

More evidence that repukes really don't believe in democracy, because when ordinary people actually vote, they lose. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. Yup, I actually posted that last week too but my thread dropped like a rock. Long
as the word gets out there, I don't care.

Soulless bastards. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. Republicans are saying
New York is in striking distance for McCain. Wanna buy a bridge?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. lieberman saying Washington State will surprise
everyone and go for mccain:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoccoR5955 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. And what, prey tell, does LIEberman say for his home state, CT???
I suppose he thinks McAncient is a shoe in, or he would be pushing him there.
The senator from CT is delirious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. I'm wondering if lieberman dares show his
flabby face in Connecticut on the campaign trail now that you mention it.

He should get pelted be rotten tomatoes like they use to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chan790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #33
90. No...he does not.
Edited on Sun Sep-21-08 11:06 AM by Chan790
I've got my tomatoes at the ready though. SOB can't hide forever.

Edit: I've got a rail for him too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FVZA_Colonel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #19
70. I'm pretty sure Obama has pulled ahead by several points in recent days.
How much is it exactly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoccoR5955 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #12
24. There are only 3 Republicans in NY saying that...
They are patients in psychiatric institutions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unfrigginreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. Nope
We're up all over including Michigan. The MSM are always lagging indicators. When a poll like Marist, well rtespected, puts you on top, believe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
14. There have been two polls out today showing Obama with the largest leads in MI so far this year.
The Hardball tools don't know what they are talking about. The female reporter was with the McCain campaign so she saw lots of support for Palin/McCain. Well, no kidding - when you go to a Palin/McCain rally, you run into a lot of Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
15. Marist poll has Obama up by 9, all polls have Obama ahead here, if only slightly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endthewar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
20. MI is definitely leaning toward Obama
However, the Detroit political machine is undergoing all sorts of chaos with the resignation of Kilpatrick. Had McCain chosen Romney, Michigan might truly be a toss-up. But since he chose Palin, Michigan should be in the clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue_onyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #20
78. I don't think Romney would've changed a thing
He was born here and lived here until he was 18...that's it. It's been 40 years since he's been here or since his father was Governor. If he had served as Governor of Michigan (not Massachusetts) then he may have had an effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
21. Time to send in Jim Webb!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Nobody here cares much about Jim Webb.. Levin and Conyers mostly.. Stabenow a bit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
featherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
22. ??? Who says we're losing Michigan?
Michigan has voted blue every election since the 1984 Reagan blowout. I expect it will again. But with the usual low single digit margin.

The media may have to pretend MI is a battleground state because the GOP is putting resources there along with the Kerry states of PA, NH and WI.

They have to play offense SOMEWHERE otherwise they'd just be playing defense in FL, CO, VA, NV, NC, MT, IN, ND, WV, etc.
Not a good strategy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #22
35. It isn't the MSM, it's EJ Dionne and Chris Cilizza (sp)
who say it will be the battleground state this year, like Ohio last time and FL in 2000.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
featherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #35
42. Yeah, I read the E.J. article... but like I said, they gotta write about something
that the GOP is pinning it's hopes on... some kinda offense. So... more print filler for the news cycle. Not serious IMO although as I said MI usually polls and votes in the single digits so there you go... a "battleground".

McCain/Palin ain't winning Michigan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
26. No we are not. Michigan had to be one of the worst states hit by the forclosure
crisis

After the financial fiasco, and the focus being redirected from lipstick on a pig to the economy, people are becoming aware of who really got them into this situation, and it was the republican deregulation phil graham/mccain philosophy


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoccoR5955 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
27. Whatcha been smokin?
It's the economy, stupid!
As long as the economy is in the crapper, and grandpa keeps saying things like he did today (the economic mess is Obama's fault) he will lose. Just get out the vote on election day, to make sure of it. It's in our hands now. If we get out the vote, we get our candidate in office. If we sit on our keisters, and only make sure that we alone vote, we get what we deserve, for being lazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PerfectSage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
29. Obama MI Win percentage 83% at 538.com also O 51.5% M 46.2% vote split projection
Edited on Fri Sep-19-08 07:28 PM by PerfectSage


MI has always been projected as blue always will be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AkFemDem Donating Member (308 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
32. Relax. The only way we lose it is if that lake spills over and sucks it all under.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #32
49. Not necessarily.
We don't know what the massive demographics change has done to the state's voting numbers. We've lost a huge number of people here in the last few years, running away from foreclosed homes and no jobs. Much of the state is reddest red, but we usually go blue if Detroit goes blue. With the population loss in Detroit, the rest of the state might be more in play than usual.

I'm not saying we're lost, but I think we need to work harder to make sure we don't go for McCain. Remember, McCain won the primary here in 2000. There are a lot of Michigan Republicans who like him a lot. They have a decent machine here (controlled the state congress for many, many years until two years ago when we won back the House by a slim margin). We shouldn't dismiss that entirely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
41. Can we do away with "talk me down"
I love Rachel Maddow. But that is getting really old really really fast.

Appologies if that was not a reference. But I still have come to hate that phrase.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #41
62. I agree I think you should start a thread on it

I am guessing she may be the only pundit who actually reads DU lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
45. No way, and go Green, beat Notre Dame.
Just thought I would throw that into the mix here.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #45
50. Whooo! Go State!
Sorry, can't help myself when I see Sparty. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
milkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
47. No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenEyedLefty Donating Member (708 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
52. I live in Oakland County, MI
Michigan has gone Dem for the last 4 elections (Kerry, Gore, Clinton, Clinton). Oakland County was blue for the last two elections (Kerry and Gore). I don't see that changing this time around. There's an electricity in the air that I haven't sensed in, well, ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tokenlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
54. Whether we're up or down by a few points, who knows...just get us some blasted yard signs !!!!
Edited on Sat Sep-20-08 09:42 AM by tokenlib
Here in Lansing, MI we can't get a yard sign unless we steal one--no we won't do that. The local Obama office is begging and begging. Many of us unemployed and treading water can't afford the online cost plus shipping--so we wait for the shipments so we can get one for $2 to $5.

For all the posts about how you either see a lot of signs--or don't in a given community--keep it in mind, sometimes you can't get a sign even if you want one. And a hell of a lot of people want them and cannot get them here in the state capitol of all places...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
55. Over 70% of MI's congresspersons are very pro-gun or pro-gun. The perception that a candidate
supports banning semiautomatic firearms could cost votes in those congressional districts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
D23MIURG23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
56. MI is a toss up, but I think we'll win it.
It didn't go to bush either time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimlup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
57. Ann Arbor, Detroit and UP are blue
Ann Arbor is one of the deepest blue regions in the country but much of the rest of the state is red. Rural Michigan is reactionary for sure. The repuklian legislator has done everything they can to disenfrancize voters in the blue areas. They've passed new laws on registration and voter ID requirements.

We're working like crazy to hold Michigan despite these changes in the election laws. We'll hold Michigan but it will be tight!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #57
76. just not true
The Democrats were competitive in almost every district in the midterms. The idea that everywhere other than Ann Arbor and Detroit are "red" is false, and reflects a prejudice that too many (suburban) Detroiters and A squared folks have about the rest of the state, and that is counter-productive and damaging to the success of the party in the state. Many, many rural districts in Michigan are 40-49% Democratic, and they are all trending Democratic now. Beyond that, you are ignoring Flint, Saginaw, Jackson, Lansing - but then Ann Arbor and suburban Detroiters do that a lot.

Our biggest political challenge in Michigan is the divide between rural and suburban and between the haves and the have nots. Gentrified city slicker liberalism works against the party and keeps putting wind back in the sails of the Republicans, and it is contradictory and oppositional to Michigan's strong Labor and Grange roots - real Democrats, traditional Democratic party ideals and principles, not whatever it is that is happening in Ann Arbor or Royal Oak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimlup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #76
88. Didn't mean to offend but...
Edited on Sun Sep-21-08 11:02 AM by jimlup
What I mean is that most of the rest of Michigan has fallen to the red. Repukes won the races, I've seen the map. Show me the data and I'll believe you but I have seen the map from 2006 and the repukes held strong in most if not all of rural Michigan. I'm not saying that there isn't a democratic base and I'm not saying places like Kalamazoo and Jackson aren't competitive but the repukes won them. That IS my point.

Ann Arbor is 80% blue. Detroit and its metro area are blue but not as deep. You are including much of the Detroit metro area in your counter point, and yes, I inadvertently left them out while thinking that "Detroit" was all I needed to say. I wish I had the map that was published in the paper after the 2006 midterms. Sorry if I offended you but if you remove Ann Arbor and Detroit(and metro area) from the state, it goes RED always and consistently.

I was registering voters (in Ann Arbor) and a woman from Saline who was visiting for Saturday breakfast and shopping told me:

"I'm voting for McCain. I'm afraid of them terrorists".

You can't tell me that this type of thinking doesn't dominate much of rural Michigan. I grew up in rural Michigan. I hope we can turn the tide somewhat this year, and yes, there exists a core democratic base but then you have to consider "them terrorists".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue_onyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #88
96. If you remove the main urban areas in most states,
they would go red as well. It's not just a Michigan thing. Rural areas in most states are Republican. If you took Seattle out of Washington, it would probably go red too. I bet if you took NYC and it's surrounding suburbs out of New York, that state would at least be a "purple" state. You can find extremely conservative areas in almost any state. Metro Detroit is half the state's population so to remove it when discussing the state doesn't make sense. Yes, you are right that rural Michigan is conservative but I just think that's true of most states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
5thGenDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #88
98. I live in Saginaw
Which is very, very blue. Saginaw Township, traditionally Republican, is also trending towards the Dems the past two election cycles.
Additionally, you forget to mention Flint (blue as it gets) and Bay City (a teeny bit more purplish recently, but still with a deep bluish tint).
John
Oh, and the Saginaw County Democratic Party HQ has lots of Obama yard signs -- $5 each. In fact, I've got a spare here in my living room. You see 'em all over Saginaw; they outnumber McCain signs probably ten to one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
59. We're going to win Michigan. Stop worrying about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
codjh9 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
61. Yahoo's composite poll has us up by 3% in MI right now (Sat. afternoon)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmic Charlie Donating Member (684 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
63. what is the true purpose of a post like this?
Edited on Sat Sep-20-08 03:27 PM by Cosmic Charlie
fear is an infection, why are you trying to pass out blankets covered in it?

Talk to the Hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
budkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
65. LMAO! Get real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmoney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
66. From parts of Michigan, you can see CANADA!
Ergo, national defense is their top priority.... and who needs a job with moose plentiful for the hunting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
68. Ah, I found the post! Read this Hamlette and cheer up.
http://www.topnews.in/usa/michigan-polls-obama-has-edge-over-mccain-21267
Obama has a lead over McLiar in alot of polls. Small but not insignificant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flowomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
69. Michigan is in play.....
at least according to 538.com today:

"Two new polls in Michigan, from ARG and EPIC-MRA (for the Detroit News) also show a tight race, with Obama leads of 2 points and 1, respectively. Each of these polls have had a slight Republican lean so far, and so they are not necessarily inconsistent with other polling that gives Obama a slightly more comfortable margin. Still, for the reasons I outlined at TNR last week, I think Michigan comes attached with more X-factors than, say, Pennsylvania or Wisconsin, and remains Obama's most difficult defensive state."

http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #69
86. yeah, but Nate still projects an Obama win in MI 84% of the time
one % point less than PA.

I've been watching CO and NH more closely. I guess I'll just have to worry about MI too. Maybe some volunteers from IL can help out, like we in Utah are helping in CO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RooseveltTruman Donating Member (92 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
72. Why Michigan is so up-for-grabs
What's also hurting Dems in Michigan is the unpopularity of the state Democratic party. Everywhere else across the nation, the Democratic parties of each state are experiencing a resurgence in strength. Even Republican Texas has seen it's Democratic party grow, along with hopes of taking back the state house.

However, Michigan is excluded from this trend. Michigan's economy is poor, and many view Gov. Jennifer Granholm as not doing enough to fix it (her approval is at 36% right about now). Also in play is Kwame Kilpatrick's corruption, indictment and resulting resignation. Not only is this a blow to the state Dem party, but also--unfortunately--will make Whites uneasy about voting in a Black man to the highest office of the land.

As many commentators have noted, Michigan's race relations are rather poisonous.

Michigan will be a close state, but my guess is Obama will win narrowly. McCain's best hope to win Michigan would have been to name Romney as his running mate--the only state (besides maybe Nevada) Romney would have been of help to. Obama will churn out the large Black population in Detroit (about 83%) and will win just enough suburban votes to give him narrow victory.

It's this same dynamic, though, that's helping Obama in Ohio. The state Republican party there is VERY unpopular, having just given the boot in '06 to corrupt Bob Taft, whose approval stood at 9% (seriously) and denied the governorship to corrupt, vote-stealing Secretary of State Ken Blackwell by a huge margin. If this were in the climate of 2004, McCain would likely be cleaning up in Ohio; Ohioans would see his "Straight Talk" and military credentials and likely line up to vote for him (not to mention that Obama typically has trouble with the "working class Whites"). But, thanks to the state party's corruption, Obama looks to have a strong fighting chance here. He likely would have been close anyway, thanks to the economy and the war, but with the "Republican" label being about 2x worse in Ohio than it is everywhere else, Obama's chance are doubly good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue_onyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #72
79. A few points.
Granholm had a 50% approval in the last poll I saw yesterday. That is higher than she has typical gotten lately but it may be because of her part in helping push Kilpatrick out of office. Also, Democrats did take back the Michigan house in 2006 and came close in many state senate races (third parties messed up up several races).

I don't think Michigan will be close...I'm guessing a 7-8% win. With our economy, I think Obama will finish stronger than Gore or Kerry did in 2000 or 2004. I also don't think Romney would've helped McCain. People, I think, overestimate the effect the Romney name has here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RooseveltTruman Donating Member (92 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #79
82. Hmmm...
Hmmm. I don't see how Michigan won't be close. John McCain is more popular there than other Republicans would be--Michigan was one of the states to give him a victory in 2000--and Obama is, quite bluntly, Black. Detroit and Michigan have FAMOUSLY poisonous race relations there. And this is one state where the economy could play to McCain's advantage, given that many people in Michigan blame the Democrats, in particular Granholm. Not to mention, Obama's push for higher fuel efficiency standards make him unpopular amongst Motor City bigwigs, who'll no doubt use their money to push against Obama...and, quite possibly, the workers under them will oppose Obama for fear of job loss.

I think Obama will win, but by a slim margin. Gore won by 5.14%, Kerry by 3.42%...my guess is Obama will DEFINITELY be less than Gore's margin and will more than likely be slightly less than Kerry's margin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue_onyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #82
85. But this isn't 2000
and this isn't the McCain from 2000. I believe his reputation has been very hurt by the his support of Bush's failed policies. Detroit has had race issues but they have gotten better and will continue to. The people who will have the biggest issue with race will be older voters, who are more likely to vote for McCain anyway.

I'm not so sure how the fuel standards will effect voters because I think people actually want higher fuel efficiency. If we didn't have high gas prices, I think this would be a bigger problem. The workers at the car companies realize they need to make more fuel efficient car now. Yeah, it will piss off the "bigwigs" but they would vote Republican even if it was Bush.

I still believe Obama will win strongly here....guess we'll just have to wait to see who's right :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
87. ELECTION fraud, NOT voter fraud!
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
91. Michigan goes blue on November 4.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Herman74 Donating Member (429 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
92. We're Not Losing Michigan, and Obama has to Concentrate on states like Colorado, Ohio, etc...
...we need to focus on turning some red states blue, not keeping blue states blue.

Michigan won't go McCain, as it's known that he would be worse for the economy. Should people worry a bit about the state, send in Joe Biden to Flint and Detroit every now and then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tokenlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
93. Obama can start a debate with McCain over another unemployment extension for hard hit states like MI
Edited on Sun Sep-21-08 11:27 AM by tokenlib
The initial 13 week extension is about up. The employment situation in Michigan has deteriorated further since the stimulus was passed. Such a focus on the economy would yet again put McCain on the defensive.. And it would appeal to over 10% of Michigan voters (and other rust belt voters)who are in the economic shit-can and are despondent and desparate. The congressional democrats had wanted a 26 week extension anyhow..

Michigan should go blue--but a little direct immediate offering of help to the hurting could go a long way to lock the state up..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bkinsd Donating Member (175 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
95. Marist Poll has Obama ahead by 9 in Michigan
This is from a poll from September 19.

BARACK OBAMA LEADS JOHN MCCAIN BY 9 PERCENTAGE POINTS IN THE WAKE OF NATION’S ECONOMIC CRISIS:
In a survey conducted entirely after this week’s economic crisis hit, Senator Barack Obama leads Senator John McCain -- 50% to 41% -- among Michigan’s registered voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressiveforever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
100. I sincerely believe Obama will carry every state Kerry did
Started to say carry every state Kerry carried- but it would be hard to be taken serious---add to the mix Iowa, New Mexico and Colorado and the rest is gravy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
101. Uh, no we're not. Sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DontBlameMe Donating Member (889 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
102. Unlikely.
Grand Rapids is the Repub stronghold, Detroit the more liberal area.

East Lansing, where I live, has a pretty good mix. So far, I've seen 2 McCain signs, 3 bumper stickers, total.

I've seen probably 30 Obama signs, probably 100+ bumper stickers. Even "regular" Republicans I know can't believe anyone would vote for the Grandpa/Caribou Barbie ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC