Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Exclusive: New Doubts Over Palin's Troopergate Claims

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:42 PM
Original message
Exclusive: New Doubts Over Palin's Troopergate Claims
Exclusive: New Doubts Over Palin's Troopergate Claims
Internal Government Document Contradicts Sarah Palin, Campaign
By JUSTIN ROOD
September 19, 2008—


An internal government document obtained by ABC News appears to contradict Sarah Palin's most recent explanation for why she fired her public safety chief, the move which prompted the now-contested state probe into "Troopergate."

Fighting back against allegations she may have fired her then-Public Safety Commissioner, Walt Monegan, for refusing to go along with a personal vendetta, Palin on Monday argued in a legal filing that she fired Monegan because he had a "rogue mentality" and was bucking her administration's directives.

"The last straw," her lawyer argued, came when he planned a trip to Washington, D.C., to seek federal funds for an aggressive anti-sexual-violence program. The project, expected to cost from $10 million to $20 million a year for five years, would have been the first of its kind in Alaska, which leads the nation in reported forcible rape.

The McCain-Palin campaign echoed the charge in a press release it distributed Monday, concurrent with Palin's legal filing. "Mr. Monegan persisted in planning to make the unauthorized lobbying trip to D.C.," the release stated.

But the governor's staff authorized the trip, according to an internal travel document from the Department of Public Safety, released Friday in response to an open records request.

<snip>

http://www.abcnews.go.com/print?id=5844710

And the hits just keep on coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Betsy Ross Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. The sub-plot thickens.
This may, we can hope, turn into her downfall. But there are so many others happening these days.Yeah, and why doesn't she wear a wedding ring?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Happyhippychick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is that $10 million before or after Palin subsidized the program by charging for the rape kits?
Just wondering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. Palin's lack of interest in programs to prevent rape and assist victims
of rape should turn the rest of the women away from her and Hank Hill's daddy:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh well, on to the next excuse while pretending the last excuse wasn't made
Palin's lawyers have convened a creative staff meeting to come up with the next creative lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. Am I reading that right? They fired him for trying to get anti-sexual-violence funding?
That was the last straw???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. through the looking glass. yes, that's what they said. What a pathetic
lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. 5th Rec'd! Oooops! Docs they didn't think or care about?
I'm hoping Walt Monegan has his day in court and wish him the best.

"Contacted Friday, Monegan confirmed the travel authorization was to pursue funding for the anti-sexual-violence program. He said the travel authorization form was completed in a fashion consistent with practice, even though it showed no expenditures. The signed form approved the travel, he said, and authorized him to use a government credit card or seek reimbursement for expenses he incurred during the trip.

Monegan said he didn't know why Palin's chief of staff approved a trip that confounded her other aides. "It sounds like it's a breakdown of communication internal to the governor's staff," he said.

The McCain-Palin campaign did not respond to requests for comment."




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. K/R.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. A big K&R - Sarah is a LIAR n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
10. I wish that someone did an ad using this, the rape victim having to pay for rape kits
and Palin's objection to abortion due to rape.

This could be an incredibly powerful ad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC