Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

abc: New Doubts Over Palin's Troopergate Claims

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 10:02 AM
Original message
abc: New Doubts Over Palin's Troopergate Claims
http://www.abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5844710&page=1

An internal government document obtained by ABC News appears to contradict Sarah Palin's most recent explanation for why she fired her public safety chief, the move which prompted the now-contested state probe into "Troopergate."

An internal government document obtained by ABC News appears to contradict Sarah Palin's most recent explanation for why she fired her public safety chief Walt Monegan, the move which prompted the now-contested state probe into "Troopergate."

Fighting back against allegations she may have fired her then-Public Safety Commissioner, Walt Monegan, for refusing to go along with a personal vendetta, Palin on Monday argued in a legal filing that she fired Monegan because he had a "rogue mentality" and was bucking her administration's directives.

"The last straw," her lawyer argued, came when he planned a trip to Washington, D.C., to seek federal funds for an aggressive anti-sexual-violence program. The project, expected to cost from $10 million to $20 million a year for five years, would have been the first of its kind in Alaska, which leads the nation in reported forcible rape.

The McCain-Palin campaign echoed the charge in a press release it distributed Monday, concurrent with Palin's legal filing. "Mr. Monegan persisted in planning to make the unauthorized lobbying trip to D.C.," the release stated.

But the governor's staff authorized the trip, according to an internal travel document from the Department of Public Safety, released Friday in response to an open records request.

The document, a state travel authorization form, shows that Palin's chief of staff, Mike Nizich, approved Monegan's trip to Washington, D.C., "to attend meeting with Senator Murkowski." The date next to Nizich's signature reads June 18.

In response to inquiries about the document Friday, the McCain-Palin campaign provided a statement from Randy Ruaro, another aide to Palin.

According to Ruaro, Monegan asked for -- and received -- approval for the travel without telling Palin's staff his reason for going. "As a matter of routine, the travel was approved by Mike Nizich ... weeks before the actual purpose was made clear by former Commissioner Monegan," Ruaro wrote.

"When you receive permission to travel, it does not mean that you receive blanket authorization to discuss or do whatever you would like on that trip," he added.

Last week a legislative panel approved a subpoena for Nizich to be interviewed by Stephen Branchflower, the prosecutor hired to conduct the Alaska Legislature's inquiry into Troopergate. The Attorney General informed the Legislature earlier this week that Nizich and other state employees subpoenaed in the matter would not submit to interviews.

Nizich did not respond to a message left Friday afternoon.

In Palin's court filing Monday – to stop an investigation by her state Personnel Board she earlier had requested – her lawyer, Thomas V. Van Flein, included numerous emails from her staff expressing confusion and incredulity over Monegan's planned D.C. trip. None of those emails were sent by or to Nizich, although he was cc'd on several.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. If approval of travel does not include approval of the PURPOSE of the travel, shouldn't
the purpose of the travel be a part of the travel request?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sammytko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. it always was when I traveled with the military..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CitizenPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. bad walt monegan!
trying to help women! The Pig will get you for this! Note to Walt: Helping women protect themselves or advance themselves or empower themselves in ANY way paints a target on your back in the Puke party.

I know this isn't really why she fired him; but it's interesting that she's offering up an excuse that makes her look like such a cold-hearted bi*ch. We're supposed to vote for you because you're a woman....and oh, yes, this is SO something Hillary would have done; fire someone for trying to get funding for battered women. the mere fact that she wouldn't add this funding to her budget makes her look like a TOTAL as&, given the stats of rape and abuse in Alaska. And now, a male trooper basically says he will find the funding for it no matter what....and she fires him? Way to go???


Patriarchal Barbie strikes again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. DU-ly Forwarded WIDELY! Thanks Much yourguide! Kiss!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. kiss kiss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. Why Does Sarah Palin HATE Rape Victims???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Basement Beat Donating Member (303 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Pundits should be asking this. She is fucking evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. There should be an ad that shows this in juxtaposition to her charging for rape kits
and being against abortion in cases of rape.

Yes, she is fucking evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeadElephant_ORG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Strongly agree. there is a pattern of evidence emerging. Pundits need to go after this. the $$
the $$ part is very much of interest. Those rape kits cost $1000 dollars!! Definitely high enough to make a lot of women just give up.

In contrast, the anti-rape program was only 20 million dollars tops. The infamous Bridge to Nowhere cost 20 times as much: $400 million.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Why would she do this? She wants her church to own this sort of program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chitty Donating Member (918 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. Because it's their fault.
They ask for it. Sluts you know.

They get what's coming to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msallied Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. It could be projection...
She herself might be a rape victim, and she's projecting the horrible feelings about herself onto others. I don't want to feel sorry for the woman, but it is one theory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. It seems enough of a psychosis on her part that you might be right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeadElephant_ORG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. deleted
Edited on Sat Sep-20-08 11:59 AM by DeadElephant_ORG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeadElephant_ORG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
16. Your question should be a top level post
Will you ask your question as a new post?

Otherwise I'll do it, and credit you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Hello and Please Do It! I'm a bit busy tonight with work and I do feel it is important
enough to spend some time to expound upon this subject.

I truly appreciate your offering to do it!

I believe the vast majority of women (and men affected by rape) must see how she has worked against the best interests of women. If they knew, I would say that the McPalin ticket would only garner the backwash (33%) of the vote.

If only a 527 group would do a nationwide ad addressing this and unfortunately I'm not connected nor do I have video editing skills to put a video up on youtube. (sigh)

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
11. Every move Palin makes in this case
every new lame excuse and every new effort to stonewall the investigation makes it seem to me that she would have been better off coming clean and admitting that she wanted to get Wooten fired because of a personal dislike for him. If she hadn't been picked by McCain as his running mate, and if she had cooperated fully with the investigation, she might have come out with some minor sanctions and maybe a slap on the wrist and then moved on. But with Republican hitmen taking over her defense of troopergate, I think they've made things much worse for her. The Republican attitude that their candidates are never wrong and can never admit mistakes has given the very opposite impression to the American people in this matter: that Sarah Palin must have committed a major crime in Troopergate because of the ultra defensive posture she's now taken, the bouncing from one excuse to the other, and the extreme Cheney-like stonewalling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
13. Palin's offensive stance on women's issues is the REAL scandal in troopergate and why McSame wants
it SHUT DOWN! Democrats needs to grill her on it. I hope Biden mentions HIS work on reducing women's violence and Palin's attacks on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
President Decider Donating Member (646 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
17. The closer this investigations gets to ending, the more McCain's people realize "SHE'S SCREWED" ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
20. And, what is the burning reason they want this covered up
now? Seems terribly innocent enough..Walt Monegan wanted to help victims of sexual abuse and palin's abuse of power won out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC