|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
SHRED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 07:58 PM Original message |
Palin to be "protected" during debate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 07:59 PM Response to Original message |
1. Why did the Obama-Biden campaign go along with this? NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dansolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 08:07 PM Response to Reply #1 |
15. Maybe that was the concession they had to make |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greg K (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 10:34 PM Response to Reply #15 |
88. Why? What concession did McCain make? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FloridaGrl (615 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 08:17 PM Response to Reply #1 |
25. yeah? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trueblue2007 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 08:20 PM Response to Reply #1 |
30. Because that lipstick on a BITCH ordered it that way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trueblue2007 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 09:32 PM Response to Reply #30 |
63. PALIN is a PIG |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
samsingh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 10:20 PM Response to Reply #63 |
83. she's a bitchy pig? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Triana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 09:38 PM Response to Reply #30 |
71. I agree. Palin is a BITCH. du Jour. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spider Jerusalem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 08:00 PM Response to Original message |
2. you know, they should have thought of that before they selected her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DesertFlower (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 08:01 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. i agree. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 08:00 PM Response to Original message |
3. Ms. Palin, a relatively inexperienced debater, at a disadvantage and largely on the defensive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jbnow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 08:18 PM Response to Reply #3 |
27. She's not an inexperienced debater. I saw her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 10:33 PM Response to Reply #27 |
87. You're exactly right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vanderBeth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 08:01 PM Response to Original message |
5. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hisownpetard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 08:05 PM Response to Reply #5 |
13. Did McCain also forbid them from using multi-syllabic words (like nincompoop, imbecile |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 08:02 PM Response to Original message |
6. And we agreed to this why? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tallison (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 08:49 PM Response to Reply #6 |
36. This is what I don't get |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 10:25 PM Response to Reply #36 |
84. Yep they'd pull out. Obama needs the debates as much as McCain but not if Palin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tallison (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-21-08 01:40 AM Response to Reply #84 |
94. Is this confirmed anywhere? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacebird (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 08:02 PM Response to Original message |
7. so Caribou Barbie isn't really a pitbull in lipstick, but a poor widdle woman who needs protection? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 10:38 PM Response to Reply #7 |
90. It isn't Sarah. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 08:02 PM Response to Original message |
8. I think Biden ought ignore the formal format when it begins. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hisownpetard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 08:03 PM Response to Original message |
9. What colossal gall, for McCain to dictate the terms of the debate to the Commission. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 08:03 PM Response to Original message |
10. We should be HARDER on her, not gentler! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gblady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 08:08 PM Response to Reply #10 |
19. Totally agree... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1corona4u (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 09:23 PM Response to Reply #19 |
55. YEAH!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 10:44 PM Response to Reply #19 |
91. I'm sure she wishes they would let her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarface2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 08:04 PM Response to Original message |
11. thanks but no thanks to the debate on nowhere!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PCIntern (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 08:04 PM Response to Original message |
12. No Prisoners... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 08:05 PM Response to Original message |
14. "relatively inexperienced" and they say she's ready to be prez? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RepublicanElephant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 08:07 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. hey! that's "sexist"!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 08:07 PM Response to Original message |
17. a loose format could leave Ms. Palin...at a disadvantage and largely on the defensive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CurtEastPoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 08:10 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. Ditto! They f'ing OWN that mess! They need to own up to it! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starry Messenger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 08:08 PM Response to Original message |
18. .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 08:09 PM Response to Original message |
20. CHECK THIS OUT: (also from the article) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tallison (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 08:52 PM Response to Reply #20 |
39. What they want is an interview, not a debate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 09:06 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. The Biden people SAID they would be fine either way - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tallison (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 09:12 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. She's not inconsequential - she's a liability |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 09:14 PM Response to Reply #43 |
47. I was trying to imply that my impression from the Biden camp's statement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tallison (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 09:26 PM Response to Reply #47 |
59. No, I got your point; my frustration is with our side's concession |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 09:36 PM Response to Reply #59 |
68. Understood. And wholeheartedly agree. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 10:27 PM Response to Reply #20 |
86. SARAH PLAYLAND IS A RISK TO NATIONAL SECURITY!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sellitman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 08:12 PM Response to Original message |
22. Will Putin be easier on her too? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Politicalboi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-21-08 03:01 AM Response to Reply #22 |
97. Of course he will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ichingcarpenter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 08:12 PM Response to Original message |
23. What the hell is this the special olympics vs the Olympics? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 10:47 PM Response to Reply #23 |
92. Thanks for the Macbeth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 08:15 PM Response to Original message |
24. Oh puhleeze. This are serious times and they call for serious people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RNdaSilva (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
26. In exchange for "sparring" in the presidential debate... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tallison (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 08:55 PM Response to Reply #26 |
40. Olbermann's doing that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RNdaSilva (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 09:21 PM Response to Reply #40 |
53. Yes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 10:48 PM Response to Reply #26 |
93. I'm loving that he's doing that . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gatorboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 08:19 PM Response to Original message |
28. This should be expected from Palin considering she offered a stand-in for Alaskan debate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bad Thoughts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 08:19 PM Response to Original message |
29. Palin's got it in the bag |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 08:43 PM Response to Reply #29 |
34. In what respect, Charlie? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FVZA_Colonel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 08:51 PM Response to Reply #34 |
38. The assumption is that she succeeds at short, catch sound-bites, while Biden gives long, detail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDJay (229 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 08:22 PM Response to Original message |
31. OMFG... Seriously. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1corona4u (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 09:27 PM Response to Reply #31 |
60. Yeah, where's the fucking pitbull with the lipstick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
32. GGGRRRRRRR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frank Booth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
33. Pathetic. Just pathetic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kirby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 08:44 PM Response to Original message |
35. Palin to Master Debater Committee re: Fairness - Thanks, but No Thanks. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crappyjazz (886 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
37. If you can't stand the heat, get out of Hillary's kitchen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fed_up_mother (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 09:01 PM Response to Original message |
41. A tighter format could prevent a Biden gaffe - remember Gore walking over to Bush? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PlanetBev (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 09:12 PM Response to Reply #41 |
45. I agree, fed_up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firedupdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
44. I hate that bitch...I'm a woman and I can say it...she fucking sucks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1corona4u (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 09:13 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. Agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trueblue2007 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 09:26 PM Response to Reply #44 |
58. Me too sweetie. I hate Palin too and I also think she's a bitch. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 09:14 PM Response to Original message |
48. Palin: not ready on day one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firedupdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 09:17 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. That should be their slogan! Not Ready On Day one! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PlanetBev (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 09:15 PM Response to Original message |
49. You'd best believe that Rachel and Keith will hammer away on this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
screembloodymurder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
50. God damn it, Obama is ahead! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firedupdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 09:19 PM Response to Reply #50 |
52. Agreed. No negotiations..have the idiot show up and be ready for the debate! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ailsagirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 09:21 PM Response to Original message |
54. Might they wire her up like *shrub* ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1corona4u (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 09:29 PM Response to Reply #54 |
61. Some of us have written to Gwen, and asked that she be checked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ailsagirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 09:40 PM Response to Reply #61 |
72. Thanks much!! I just sent a comment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Undercurrent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 09:24 PM Response to Original message |
56. Time to collect the angry mob, and storm the castle gate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nichomachus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 09:25 PM Response to Original message |
57. Ah -- the low expectations game all over again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ima_sinnic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 09:29 PM Response to Original message |
62. hey, fweeper lurkers, aren't you proud of your intellecutal giant, Phailin Palin? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Politicalboi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-21-08 03:09 AM Response to Reply #62 |
98. Hot Dog! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Monk06 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 09:32 PM Response to Original message |
64. Biden will hit her with substance and she'll respond with mechanical talking points |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 09:32 PM Response to Original message |
65. This is Joe Biden - trust me, he'll still make mince meat of her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mabus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 09:34 PM Response to Original message |
66. This isn't going to make the press happy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 09:35 PM Response to Original message |
67. Special Debate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arugula Latte (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 09:37 PM Response to Original message |
69. So she's ready to be president but she's not ready to debate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCBob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 09:37 PM Response to Original message |
70. It won't matter. She will look bad not matter what. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Connonym (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 10:12 PM Response to Reply #70 |
78. But remember W in the debates? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCBob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 10:20 PM Response to Reply #78 |
82. True. But I doubt the "tragically clueless" will even watch this debate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Top Cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 09:40 PM Response to Original message |
73. This latest move should show those thinking about voting for Palin/McCain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knitter4democracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 09:43 PM Response to Original message |
74. Hmm. I think Rove's plan could backfire. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Agent William (628 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-21-08 04:07 AM Response to Reply #74 |
99. True... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 09:46 PM Response to Original message |
75. This is being set up so that she will benefit from "the soft bigotry of lowered expectations". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
76. Doesn't matter. She's toast no matter what. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FightingIrish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 10:02 PM Response to Original message |
77. They should open the debate with a disclaimer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avaistheone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 10:14 PM Response to Original message |
79. Sssesh Palin is already whining. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jennicut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 10:16 PM Response to Original message |
80. If she can't handle going toe to toe with Joe Biden then why should she be the next VP? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 10:17 PM Response to Original message |
81. repeat after me, do no let those fuckers dictate terms.....repeat after me, do not let those fuckers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 10:26 PM Response to Original message |
85. PLEASE send her back here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-20-08 10:37 PM Response to Original message |
89. This might actually help Joe Biden |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TooRaLoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-21-08 01:47 AM Response to Original message |
95. Well, DUH. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Life Long Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-21-08 01:55 AM Response to Original message |
96. Biden will give Palin an education, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-21-08 04:13 AM Response to Original message |
100. Yeah - you don't learn "free-wheeling, direct exchanges" from those beauty pagent questions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-22-08 02:54 PM Response to Original message |
101. Ohhhhhhhhhhh, NOW she's inexperienced. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tanyev (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-22-08 03:23 PM Response to Reply #101 |
102. Yeah, what happened to all that executive experience she's supposed to have? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:45 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC