Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can Obama win without PA?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
blueinindiana Donating Member (575 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 03:11 PM
Original message
Can Obama win without PA?
Edited on Sun Sep-21-08 03:11 PM by blueinindiana
I starting to have serious doubts about Obama and PA for many reasons the main being RACISM but also Governor Ed Rendell who would rather see 4 years of McCain and another Clinton run than a Obama victory.

i also fear for Ohio due to racsim.

How is Obama supposed to win if he can't win PA or OH?

I foresee Obama winning the popular vote and losing electorally.

He going to do better in red states but not enough to win them and thus winning the popular vote but still lose the election.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. We would need Florida
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueinindiana Donating Member (575 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Florida will not go Obama
Racism and his middle name will make sure of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Keep the faith. It's nearly dead even in every poll coming out of FL right now.
Palm Beach County types are spooked by Palin and Obama has just now launched his criticisms of McLame's maniacal SS privatization scheme. The Campaign is determined to keep FL in play all the way until election day. Watch it happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PermanentRevolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
28. You can tell that all the way from Indiana, huh?
'Cause those of us that actually live here aren't quite so certain of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
45. Dang!! you seem sure of yourself
ain't you, my God people what the hell is wrong with you folks????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
50. I think Florida is within our grasp.
Certainly McCain will carry the Panhandle counties but the level of activity and commitment is up in the I-4 corridor, Miami-Dade is a more contemporary Miami-Dade, there's been no significant decline in support for the blue counties in SE Florida -- Broward or Palm Beach, McCain wants off-shore drilling in a state dependent on tourist dollars generally and beach tourist dollars especially, Biden is more persuasive to older voters than Palin in a state where there are kazillions of older voters, recent polling shows Obama near-tied or slightly ahead, and McCain's presence in the state is lackluster.

I say we carry Florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. If he loses PA, he loses several other states...
IMO. We are pushing hard here...AA voters are going to turn out in record numbers...I've never seen the community so mobilized...now all we have to do is get them all counted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. thanks!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueinindiana Donating Member (575 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. I agree
If he loses PA he will also lose OH and Michigan at the very least.


It is sad this country still judges people by their race instead of their character.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
43. From your lips.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. Where's Hillary? We need her in PA (and FL)
Hillary, Bill come out wherever you are...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
globalvillage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. Rendell is campaigning for Obama
I saw him yesterday. Are you seeing somewhere that he's not?

http://www.kerryvision.net/2008/09/created_with_admarkets_flickrs.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
30. Rendell forming 'truth squad' to defend Obama
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/08265/913835-470.stm?cmpid=news.xml

<snip>
Gov. Ed Rendell said he plans to announce a "truth squad" initiative tomorrow to counter "lies and distortions" by the campaign of Arizona Sen. John McCain, the Republican presidential nominee.

At a news conference yesterday morning in Pittsburgh with Mayor Luke Ravenstahl and former Iowa Gov. Tom Vilsack, Mr. Rendell said that television ads and statements by the campaign have inaccurately suggested that Mr. McCain's Democratic opponent, Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, would raise taxes on most Americans.

The vast majority, in fact, would receive bigger tax breaks under Mr. Obama's tax plan, he said, outlining various groups of lower- and middle-income people, ranging from a single parent with young children to couples and elderly widows, that he said would do better.

Mr. Rendell and others have accused the McCain campaign before of making false statements about Mr. Obama's tax plan. Last week, for example, FactCheck.org said the McCain campaign "has released yet another ad that makes false claims."
<snip>


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
globalvillage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. Thanks, I was looking for that.
I was taking pictures, and not able to take notes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. Obama needs all the states Kerry won, plus a couple of others (w/o Ohio)
If Obama can't win PA, then he will lose other states that Kerry carried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
d_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. McCain won't be taking any kerry states *
Edited on Sun Sep-21-08 03:20 PM by d_b
bet the house on it.

but if he did lose PA, he could get to 270 by winning Virginia (He'd also need NV, CO, NM). And Virginia is looking quite good for us. McCain unable to escape MOE + Barack ground game = Win.

*assuming there are no shenanigans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberadorHugo Donating Member (557 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. Your concerned is duly noted.
Personally, I do not share it. Pittsburgh and the outer suburbs of Philly have been trending blue since the early-1990s and record turn out in both the inner suburbs and Philadelphia proper will be more than enough to but BHO over the top. GOBAMA!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
12. theoretically yes, but in reality, no. However, odds are strong that
Obama will win PA, though OH looks to be more difficult. But Obama is in far better shape than McCain is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
13. He'll win Pennsylvania
He has to. We have no other choice. Which is why we will all keep working, despite the concern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
14. Ignore Zogby interactive polls
If you do that, McCain hasn't been up in a PA poll in months. Can you answer one question for me? Why are people betting on intrade that McCain only has a 30% chance of winning PA, while Obama has a 70% chance of winning it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberadorHugo Donating Member (557 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. The 30% percent are morans...
Edited on Sun Sep-21-08 03:23 PM by LiberadorHugo
They're the same sort of people who will piss away their government cheques at the slot machines or at the race tracks and then thump their Bibles and complain that those good-for-nothing heathens are spending $20 a week on PokerStars. :-)

Fundamental principle of GOP crapitalism:

Haliburton and Bechtel: Legitimate, patriotic businesses!!!!!

Sportsbook and PokerStars: Fronts through which the Big Scary Gangsters launder our money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
15. No! PA must go blue and I think it will. We might actually get CO and NM as well
Ohio and Florida are the ones to watch I think. Those are more up for grabs then PA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 03:22 PM
Original message
Thank you for your firm concern.
We appreciate the doom and gloom...especially now. Thank you for it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
19. It's amazing. Sheer negativity. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iiibbb Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
17. Short answer... yes.
Several scenarios where he loses PA and wins.

http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PerfectSage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
18. I'm not concerned. Even Rove.com.s electoral map shows Obama leading in PA.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
20. This post is absurd, as is your post about Florida.
Ask the elderly Jews in Florida how much they like Sarah Palin. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
21. we can't win without pa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
22. MI, OH, FL and PA will all be close. Obama needs any 2 out of 4.
If Obama wins 2 of the above, he can pick up the slack in VA, IA, NV, NM, CO or MO.

I know it is tense right now. But the debates have not even started yet.

My personal opinion is a little different than some. I think Obama has the most to gain from the debates. He doesn't have to "win" them in the classic sense, like Kerry did in 04.

A lot of people WANT to support Obama but are uncertain about whether he is up to the job, due to the experience thing mainly. If Obama can hold his own, he will do good enough to make these people comfortable to support him. McCain is gonna come off old, and people will prefer something else. Obama will win the debates by tying them, in my view.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
23. .
Edited on Sun Sep-21-08 04:22 PM by AtomicKitten
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
24. the key states are the three bellwether states: Missouri, Ohio, and Penn
we don't need Florida if he wins these three.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John1956PA Donating Member (282 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
25. In PA, seniors and pro-life voters (especially Catholics) are big factors.
Edited on Sun Sep-21-08 03:31 PM by John1956PA
Casey beat Santorum handily in 2006 because Casey appealed to pro-lifers. Also, in 2006, Rendell beat Swann handily because seniors related to Rendell's elder appearance. PA is a tough nut for liberals to crack. But, it is likely that the vote in Philly, Pittsburgh, Erie, Scranton, and a handful of other cities with populations over 50,000 will offset the rural vote which would never go more than 33% for the Democratic candidate regardless of who he or she might be. Obama can win here if he is strong in the debates. I think Obama needs PA to win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. Excuse me, but Big Ed looked "elder"? Bwahaha! He's the halest fellow well-met YOU'LL ever see!
Edited on Sun Sep-21-08 04:05 PM by WinkyDink
He defeated Swannie because the latter was a MORON.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John1956PA Donating Member (282 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. Elder not elderly.
From Dictionary.com:

dictionary results for: elder

1. of greater age; older.

. . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MgtPA Donating Member (390 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #25
51. Casey beat Santorum because Santorum is vomit on a plate!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grandpappy Donating Member (75 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #25
52. Why Erie?
Erie is republican strong hold. Along with the western counties bordering Ohio except in the south eastern part of the state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John1956PA Donating Member (282 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. I stand corrected about Erie.
I thought that the city of Erie favored the Democrats. You are also correct in stating that the Northwest rural counties such as Crawford, Warren, Mercer, Jefferson, Venango, and Bradford are strongly Republican. Evenly split is Lawrence County where the cities of New Castle and Ellwood favor the Democrats and the rural townships favor the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grandpappy Donating Member (75 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #53
61. No problem
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TimeChaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #25
65. A pro-life, life-long Catholic Republican I know in PA
is voting for Obama in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
26. It's theoretically possible for him to win and lose Pennsylvania but unlikely
Pennsylvania and other "swing states" are "swing states" because they are somewhat of a bellwether for the rest of the nation. If Obama loses this swing state that tends to favor Democrats then he likely won't win the swing states that tend to favor Republicans.

Still it is theoretically possible. There used to be an old saying "As Maine goes, so goes the nation" because it was the traditional bellwether. Then in 1936 Roosevelt beat Landon in every state except for Maine and Vermont and one of Roosevelt's political advisors re-coined the phrase "As Maine goes, so goes Vermont".

That said, Obama will win Pennsylvania.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DiamondKrosse Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #26
58. No Dem has won the Presidency without PA since
Edited on Sun Sep-21-08 08:51 PM by DiamondKrosse
1948, when Harry Truman beat Tom Dewey in his famous upset win. However, oddly enough, it did go with Hoover in 1932, one of the few states to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bermudat Donating Member (985 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
27. He will win if all the young folks who registered to vote actually vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BklynChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
29. no we can't. but we WILL win PA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
31. Your comment about Rendell is asinine. Moreover, PA. will go BLUE.
Edited on Sun Sep-21-08 04:02 PM by WinkyDink
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
33. PA is going for the Democrat. Period.
There are 1,000,000 more registered Democrats than Republicans in PA.

How did Rendell, a Jewish former mayor and former D.A. of a "big city in SE of PA" (not western PA or upstate PA), get into office, not once, but TWICE after the so-called "popular" Republican PA governor Tom Ridge became the head of more "big government" (and similarly a Democrat, Bob Casey became governor TWICE after an earlier "popular" Republican PA governor named Dick Thornburgh had become head of the DOJ as the U.S. Attorney General)?

PA is no longer a "red state". It is solidly purple turning blue. And IMHO, there are some hardened Democrats upstate who have been Democrats for life and would rather sit home (if they don't want Obama) than pull the repuke lever. I think that considering that McLame had been a moderate candidate until his body was co-opted by the lunatic fringe neocons and religious nutjobs, he probably would have done better than he will now. And with the Catholic vote here, as they learn about Palin's brand of "religion", they are going to shy away from the rest of her unorthodox philosophy once they get beyond the anti-abortion part. And correspondingly, the hunters may also shy away from her brand of "cheating" while hunting. These are more who may sit home if they refuse to vote for Obama.

I expect the racism may turn out to be what some are dubbing "reverse-Bradley", where they will still lie to the pollsters, but the other way, being too embarrassed to publicly admit to holding their noses and voting for their pocketbooks (and for a black man). Many of these folks react similarly as lone Democrats living in red communities who feared being labeled as a Democrat (and in some cases, being forced to hide their preferred party lest they be ostracized or get less services, etc), and thus either didn't bother to vote, or registered independent and only voted in general elections, or registered Republican but crossed over during a general election.

I am more concerned about what is up with Indiana, which sits right next to Illinois? :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
35. There's a lot of posters wondering about MI, PA, OH, FL
and most, including you, are now on my ignore list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
37. Yes, but it won't be an issue, IMO.
We carry the Keystone State.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Secret_Society Donating Member (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
38. Yes but I wouldn't worry about PA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
39. PA is a lock. Sheesh.
Edited on Sun Sep-21-08 05:08 PM by BlooInBloo
EDIT: And I can't WAIT to shove PRESIDENT OBAMA in PA racist hicks' faces next year.

EDITEDIT: per 538.com, Obama wins PA 85% of the time in simulations. That's a lock.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadrasT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #39
48. Cheers for this:
"EDIT: And I can't WAIT to shove PRESIDENT OBAMA in PA racist hicks' faces next year."

I'll second that. I've been dealing with PA racist hicks my whole life (grew up in RED Lancaster County, since then have moved farther east where it's not quite so horrendous).

I will positively relish shoving PRESIDENT OBAMA in their faces. :woohoo:

GOBAMA!!! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
40. If he wins IA, NM, loses PA, but wins FL, he will have exactly 270.
Edited on Sun Sep-21-08 05:07 PM by zlt234
If he doesn't win one of PA, OH, or FL, it is very difficult for him to win. I don't think anyone would disagree with me there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
41. This is so fucking stupid
Obama is not going to lose Pennsylvania. Every four years we have this silly talk. It's ridiculous.

PA is a blue state. I lived in the central part of it for 8 years. It is a blue state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. What's stupid is to assert we will win it because you live in the central part of it.
I still think we are more likely to win it, but I am not about to pretend that it will be easy, or that it will be a massive win, or that it might not be a squeaker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. It won't be a squeaker
5%

bookmark it.

keep working, but by all means bookmark it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
42. and you also believe that it is impossible for Obama to win Indiana

so its all pretty consistent for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #42
55. Ah - I didn't realize the poster's history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
darius15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
47. Unless McCain wins the popular vote by 4-6 percent, PA goes blue.
Count on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sampsonblk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
49. Don't worry about PA
The Keystone state is solid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
54. No chance in hell
Because it's not an isolated outcome. Pennsyalvania is several points blue compared to the nation itself. If we lose Pennsylvania, it means it's a national trend and everything else of significance is also lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
56. Stop worrying about that stupid AP article...
and mindless concern-trolling talking heads. Barack knows what he is doing, and he's going to win PA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
57. PA is a MUST (and we will if we FIGHT) and Florida is VERY doable. Also,
It is very competetive in IN, NC, NV, VA, and OH, and we're winning in CO, IA, and NM right now which were all red last time. With the right ATTACK-THE-BASTARDS-RELENTLESSLY campaign, we can and will this election even in some RED territory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paregdem Donating Member (221 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
59. Rendell Forming 'Truth Squad' to Defend Obama
Sorry if this has already been posted, I had to hurry and add the article below that was in today's Pittsburgh Post-Gazette before I got the chance to read all of the replies.

Rendell Forming 'truth squad' to defend Obama

Sunday, September 21, 2008
By Joe Fahy, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Gov. Ed Rendell said he plans to announce a "truth squad" initiative tomorrow to counter "lies and distortions" by the campaign of Arizona Sen. John McCain, the Republican presidential nominee.

At a news conference yesterday morning in Pittsburgh with Mayor Luke Ravenstahl and former Iowa Gov. Tom Vilsack, Mr. Rendell said that television ads and statements by the campaign have inaccurately suggested that Mr. McCain's Democratic opponent, Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, would raise taxes on most Americans.

The vast majority, in fact, would receive bigger tax breaks under Mr. Obama's tax plan, he said, outlining various groups of lower- and middle-income people, ranging from a single parent with young children to couples and elderly widows, that he said would do better.

Paul Lindsay, a McCain campaign spokesman, said that at a time of increased economic hardship, Pennsylvania families deserve to know about Mr. Obama's record, including that he has voted for higher taxes "nearly 100 times" in the Senate and "plans to tax coal and natural gas that are an engine for job growth in the state." In February, Mr. Obama did tell a San Antonio newspaper, "What we ought to tax is dirty energy, like coal and, to a lesser extent, natural gas." But the remark was made after he was asked whether taxes should be levied on renewable energy sources and "was not a general call for increasing taxes on coal or natural gas," according to FactCheck.org. Mr. Obama "certainly does not have any such proposal as part of his public platform," the Web site noted.

Mr. Rendell and others have accused the McCain campaign before of making false statements about Mr. Obama's tax plan. Last week, for example, FactCheck.org said the McCain campaign "has released yet another ad that makes false claims."

"As we keep saying," the Web site noted, "Obama says he'll raise income taxes and capital gains taxes only for couples earning more than $250,000 per year or singles making over $200,000."

Less clear is how Mr. Obama, if elected, would accomplish those goals, particularly facing budget deficits and a struggling economy, said G. Terry Madonna, a political science professor and pollster from Franklin & Marshall College in Lancaster.

Mr. Rendell was in town yesterday for political meetings and appearances, but no official business, said his spokesman, Chuck Ardo.

The news conference was held at Grandview Park, Mount Washington, where the Obama campaign kicked off "Steps for Change," a local effort to register new voters. While those efforts have been ongoing, "Steps for Change" acknowledged Pittsburgh's status as the U.S. city with the most public stairways -- 712, with a total of 44,645 steps.

Polls show the race between Mr. McCain and Mr. Obama has narrowed in Pennsylvania, considered a battleground state.

Speaking to a small group of Obama canvassers at the news conference, Mr. Ravenstahl and Mr. Vilsack, a Pittsburgh native, urged them to press on.

"We need to continue to do whatever we can" before the Nov. 4 election, Mr. Ravenstahl told the group. "You all will make the difference."

Joe Fahy can be reached at jfahy@post-gazette.com or 412-263-1722.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
60. I'm only having serious doubts about you.
Can't win Indiana, can't win PA. Polls showing otherwise.

GTFO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
darius15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #60
62. Come, on leave him alone.We're all Democrats here.
Edited on Sun Sep-21-08 08:59 PM by darius15
If he was a rethug, we would know and the admins would remove him right away.

Although pretty much everyone here disagrees with the OP that we can't win PA, let's leave the "GTFO" stuff outta this thread, please?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #62
71. Do you know how many trolls we have here?
Go take a look at all the "concern posts" all ready for Monday morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
63. Obama will win PA and OH and likely FL also. The outcome in Obama's favor will be nearly certain
by 9 pm EST on election night. A lot of people talk about 2004 but this does not even come close to resembling 2004. There was an incumbent president in 2004. Obama is a better candidate than Kerry and is running a better campaign. Palin has energized some of the Republican base, yes, but it is offset by her high negatives with the rest of the electorate. McCain loses some independents and potential Hillary defectors with Palin on board.
And Palin will tilt some wavering moderate Republicans against McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
64. You really seem to love talking about an impending Obama loss, racism, & bashing the Clintons
Take your incessant negativity somewhere else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
66. We don't win without PA. Thats the bottom line
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
67. If he were to lose PA, states like MN MI and OH would already be lost.
So its not all that likely of a situation to begin with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberadorHugo Donating Member (557 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #67
68. And when, pretell, has MN ever gone red?
Just wondering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
69. We're not gonna lose PA, so quit bellyaching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okieinpain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
70. I have this funny feeling that it will not even be close on 11/04.
and I'm one of those person's that was worried about the polls after the repug's convention. not saying obama isn't going to have to work for it, but when it breaks it's going to break big.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 05:26 AM
Response to Original message
72. My wife and I are in PA, and our votes will carry the state
for Obama.

mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 05:27 AM
Response to Original message
73. I don't believe Rendell is a PUMA. He is an old school Dem. He'll work for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarbonDate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 05:46 AM
Response to Original message
74. Obama needs Pennsylvania.
Or Ohio.

Or Florida.

McCain needs both Ohio and Florida, plus Colorado or one other surprise.

But in reality, Obama needs every state he can get. That said, this thing's not in the bag, but I like our chances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC