Fire Walk With Me
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-08 03:31 PM
Original message |
PBS Poll: Is Palin qualified to be vice-president? (Currently, Yes=55%) |
graywarrior
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-08 03:33 PM
Response to Original message |
1. This god damn poll is like herpes. |
KewlKat
(867 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-08 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
so true.........thanks for the laugh!
|
napi21
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-08 03:33 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Done...still Plain 55%! Grrrrrrrrrr n/t |
d_b
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-08 03:35 PM
Response to Original message |
3. the poll is freeped to shit |
|
the first few days showed much different percentages.
|
Slit Skirt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-08 03:37 PM
Response to Original message |
4. you can vote as many times as you want |
AtomicKitten
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-08 03:37 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Ms. Palin's nomination forever puts to rest the argument of experience. |
|
It was a really dumb move on the part of McBush because he effectively neutered his own argument against Obama re: experience, and the wingnut response to this is proof-positive the GOP is entirely full of shit.
|
Speck Tater
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-08 03:39 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Well, that settles it then. |
|
If the PBS poll says it true, I guess it's true. We can all pack up and go home now. It's hopeless.
Get a grip. Any Internet poll is PURE BS. It has no value whatsoever. It has no meaning whatsoever. It wouldn't matter if it said 100% yes. It's still utterly pointless to even think about it, let lone worry about it.
|
Orsino
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-08 03:39 PM
Response to Original message |
7. The fact that this poll exists means she has already lost it. n/t |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:08 PM
Response to Original message |