Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did McCain Really Leave Fellow Vietnam & Laos POW's To Die in '92? - Looks Like It...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Indi Guy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 07:57 AM
Original message
Did McCain Really Leave Fellow Vietnam & Laos POW's To Die in '92? - Looks Like It...
Edited on Mon Sep-22-08 08:12 AM by Indi Guy

New book exposes little-known facts on presidential candidate John McCain

By C.J. Raven
U.S. Veteran Dispatch
September 14, 2008

A just released book about the 2008 Republican presidential nominee takes a critical look at Arizona Sen. John McCain's rise to power and his amazingly successful political career, which continues to draw its inspiration from a questionable military career.

Vetting John McCain is based on carefully researched and meticulously documented public and military records, eyewitness accounts, and on statements McCain made in his book, Faith of My Fathers: A Family Memoir.

Written by Vietnam veteran and former Green Beret Ted Sampley, the book explores McCain's years at the United States Naval Academy, his early career as a Navy aviator, and his exploits before and after his five and one-half years in a Vietnamese prisoner of war camp.

Sampley, a long-time POW/MIA activist delves into McCain's puzzling relationship with his former captors and his apparent abandonment of other Americans left behind in Vietnam as missing or prisoners of war.

Leaders of the POW/MIA movement describe how they fought to have McCain and the U.S. government investigate reported sightings of missing and imprisoned military members, and describe their contemptuous treatment by McCain and his staff
.
http://www.usvetdsp.com/sep08/vetting_mccain.htm



Other sources:
http://www.etherzone.com/2008/lebo091708.shtml
http://forums.the-dispatch.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/9071076365/m/3711080377/r/7571060377
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20081006/schanberg

While independently reasearching this story, I stumbled upon this DU link -- http://journals.democraticunderground.com/berni_mccoy/517

Google "vetting John McCain" and "Ted Sampley"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Ted Sampley is a nut
He went after Kerry and McCain.. Part of that reason was he had an organization.. POW families, I can't remember the name, but anyway, they went at it hammer and tongs, when it was exposed by McCain that Sampley and another guy, were using 75% of the donations up .. only 25% was going to what they organization was originally set up for.. and he has been dogging McCain ever since. He dogged Kerry.

Now this is ancient history, I may have forgotten some of the specifics. But Ted Sampley, take with a dose of ExLax
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Actually worse
He was telling families that he knew that US POWs were still alive in captivity and that the government had reasons not to obtain their release. He took money from these people and other people who wanted only to help the troops. They and other con men pushed many stories - all of which were debunked by the committee - which was chaired by John Kerry, not a likely person to want to protect President Nixon's reputation. (The media (and Bill Clinton) always credited McCain on this committee but Kerry was the chair and did by far the most work The ranking member was Bob Smith. McCain was important mainly for who he was,)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Your right! It was the committee chaired by Kerry
This is one of those things that were in the misty back of my brain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sampley is a con man and degenerate person who profitted from the despair of people who lost loved
Edited on Mon Sep-22-08 08:49 AM by karynnj
ones. You should consider removing both these posts because - innocently - you are abetting something on the level of the SBVT.

He is on the level of the SBVT. There are many things to go after McCain on this is not one of them. This man is poison.

The effort to determine if POWs was held was led by John Kerry and almost every Vietnam vet in the Senate was on the committee. They all signed off on the final report - including Bob Smith, the extremely conservative Senator who came in as the clear proponent of the believe that people were left behind.

Kerry had Nixon administration people testify before the committee and even had questions submitted to Nixon. With his history, both in supporting veterans and having been personally targeted by Nixon, he had no reason to let them off the hook. In addition, Kerry gave Smith, who was the ranking member (not McCain, who thought it politically risky) half the staff of the committee - in stead of having more staff himself.

Kerry negotiated the ability of the Senate team and the investigators to go anywhere with no notice. CSPAN had a long (several hours) video replayed sometime last year that showed one trip over there by Kerry, Bob Smith and another Senator. The impression I got was how immense the job was. They had taken the reports of any sightings and mapped them and concentrated on those areas. (Later the investigators looked into each individual account and did there best to determine the circumstances.) All the committee members made trips to Vietnam. Kerry made 14, some to areas he was in. Bob Smith, at one point in the CSPAN footage, speaking of how hard this was for him spoke of how tough this had to be for Kerry. For all of them, this was a difficult, grueling effort that was always seen as a no win situation. (Kerry's entire staff was said to have wanted him not to accept the committee assignment, much less the chairmanship. It was Kerry's managerial skill that designed a process that the others agreed with and his diplomatic skills that kept the committee fights from destroying the effort.

Kerry also pushed the Vietnamese and neighboring countries to undertake a more concerted effort to repatriate remains. This effort was later included in the treaty. At this point, a MUCH lower percent of Americans unaccounted for exists from the Vietnam War than from the Korean War and WWII.

So, why do these stories exist. The reason that committee started was a Newsweek cover that purported to show three POWs still in captivity. The committee debunked this ultimately showing the picture was a fraud, they were not American and it was not Vietnam. What there was were various conscienceless people who raised money from the families and friends of the missing soldiers - saying they would do the investigation the country didn't do. Shapley was one of the most prominent of these and he verbally attacked McCain at many of these hearings - to the point where he was ordered thrown out by Kerry. The committee proved many of these people were con men and that they had actually done nothing other than raise money.

In addition to the conmen were the conned. Some were people who had lost people and who, not only never had the cloture that a body would provide, but had people holding out hope that they were still alive. Then throw in people on both the far left and the far right who are intensely suspicious of the government.

Now, take it a step forward, what is the gain to Vietnam to keep these men for what is now more than 3 decades after the war. During that time, they would need to pay guards and costs of shelter. In addition, as it is secret, they can't be put to work in the country and they can't be used as a bargaining chip. The committee checked every large building in the areas where there were rumours and they interacted with people in the area to learn what they knew - knowing they might not get the full truth.

In the CSPAN video tape, you have the Senators, especially Kerry speaking (through a US interpretor) with citizens everywhere - often with not Vietnamese officials. In a very cute segment, Kerry had a large group of little kids following him. At the beginning, he pointed to an animal and said a name and the kids corrected his pronunciation. Both the kids and Kerry were laughing. Later, he asked if they had seen Americans like him and they hadn't. (Seeing this reminded me of how my kids (then 6,8 and 11) were asked if they knew Hebrew by El AL when we flew out of NYC on a trip that was to Eqypt, where my sister was living and Israel. The 8 year old said yes, so they switched to Hebrew, and she stammered she only knew things like (Jewish prayers). That guy then came over spoke to our questioner and the tone changed immensely - they knew from the innocent 8 year old that we were a Jewish family with kids. In this case, if there were Americans - a kid might have blurted it out - especially to the Senator, who they were fascinated by.

In addition, you need to find a reason why not just McCain, but all the members of that committee could either be conned by the Vietnamese or lying on purpose. I seriously doubt either Kerrey, who spoke of hating Nixon, or Kerry would have any interest in covering up for Nixon. (Kerry was still pushing the real time investigation of BCCI, which was showing a huge amount of corruption from both Democrats and Republicans. That investigation was hard to understand, where the POW one wasn't. Kerry had also exposed the (then) ongoing gun and drug running to illegally support the Contras. So, you can't claim he didn't have the guts to expose something as awful as Americans spending over 2 decades in captivity.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. Isn't That A Right Wing Meme?
It goes as thus:

The evil VietNameze are still holding American prisoners and therefore we should not have normalized relations with them...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aldo Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. Look folks, if the MSM would do its job, we wouldn't have to depend on fringe outlets
But it doesn't. So we have to try to judge the message itself, not just the messenger. The MSM has reported amazing allegations and statements over the years, but usually only once with no follow up. A breaking news story that is never repeated. Read Schanberg -- make up your own mind.

http://www.nationinstitute.org/p/schanberg09182008pt1
http://www.villagevoice.com/2004-02-17/news/did-america-abandon-vietnam-war-p-o-w-s-part-1/6

I believe this tragedy/issue is the great sleeper of this age of RepubliCON Treason. It speaks across the Red/Blue state divide. Join it to the other Repuke acts of treason: VA treatment of wounded veterans, exposure of troops to DU munitions, 9/11, etc. It's all of a piece -- a cloth woven from a single thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. This has been debunked YEARS ago
What is with your Lyndon LaRouche, 911 conspiracy posts?

I read Schanberg and I think he was taken in by conmen - it happens. I believe John kerry and the 8 other veterans who spent an enormous amount of time in Vietnam working on this and the US investigators who followed up on the Senators to do this job
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC