By Greg Sargent - September 22, 2008, 9:47AM
The Obama campaign is going after McCain over a story in today's
New York Times reporting that McCain campaign manager Rick Davis took a staggering $30,000 a month for five years as the head of a group set up by Fannie and Freddie to defend them against stricter government regulations.
The Obama campaign's broadside came in response to a
McCain ad released this morning tying Obama to the Rezko mess. From Obama campaign spokesperson Bill Burton:
"It's no coincidence that on the very day newspapers reported that John McCain's campaign manager was paid $2 million to lobby against tighter regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the McCain campaign would launch this false, gratuitous attack. Barack Obama was elected to the Illinois Senate as an independent Democrat. He took on the Chicago Democratic organization in a primary to win a seat in the US Senate. And in both Illinois and Washington, he has challenged the Old Guard for landmark ethics reforms."
In the current environment, the
Times story should be an important one by any measure. In one particularly choice nugget, a former Fannie exec explains why currying favor with Davis was seen as so valuable to the mortgage giants:
"The value that he brought to the relationship was the closeness to Senator McCain and the possibility that Senator McCain was going to run for president again," said Robert McCarson, a former spokesman for Fannie Mae, who said that while he worked there from 2000 to 2002, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac together paid Mr. Davis's firm $35,000 a month. Mr. Davis "didn't really do anything," Mr. McCarson, a Democrat, said.
So according to this exec, it was worth it to Fannie, in its quest to fend off regulatory oversight, to pay tens of thousands of dollars a month to Davis simply because of the possibility that McCain would become president.