Drunken Irishman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-08 12:58 PM
Original message |
Obama opens up 8 point lead in Minnesota. |
KitchenWitch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message |
graywarrior
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Once he states pulling ahead in a few states, it will become contagious |
|
I hope he kicks McCain's ass.
|
Iris
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
24. from the looks of the threads in GDP - you are right, graywarrior! |
|
:applause: :applause: :applause: :applause:
|
featherman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message |
3. MN has never worried me. Disappointed in ND however. |
KitchenWitch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. I have been disappointed in ND for years.... |
southpaw
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I think Obama is owning the post-convention campaign |
TomClash
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-08 01:00 PM
Response to Original message |
|
He should have a 15 point lead in MN.
|
alcibiades_mystery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
13. He should have a 40% lead nationally |
TomClash
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
17. No but he should be up by 8-10% nationally |
|
and if he doesn't win Minnesota going away, he doesn't win.
I'll take an 8 point lead, but I'd expect him to be up by more. It's a reflection on the country, not him. I like the guy.
|
alcibiades_mystery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-08 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
20. Why? On what basis? I'm interested in hearing an analysis to that effect |
|
The polls have him up between 4% and 9% nationally. Why is that below what should be expected?
|
TomClash
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
|
1. McCain is a poor candidate and Barack is a good candidate.
2. The economy is shit and getting worse - with or without the global financial crisis - and the incumbent party is responsible.
3. The War is still unpopular - surge or no surge - and it's expensive. He opposed the war.
|
alcibiades_mystery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
|
Edited on Mon Sep-22-08 03:20 PM by alcibiades_mystery
1. I'm not convinced. McCain is a poor candidate, perhaps, but the right has been densely organized and extremely effective in getting their partisans out for forty years. They're also very good at pushing on middle of the road issues. I see no reason why ANY stuffed suit with an R behind his/her name would be 10% back.
2. The 1968 election was close in the popular vote after the most disastrous party performance probably ever seen. incumbent party does not have the same dynamics as incumbent candidate. Also, see #1.
3. The war is increasingly unimportant in people's minds as the death toll has remained well below the outrage threshold for many months. It's a wash, at best.
Once again, I think these "Obama should have a 12% point lead" posts are just weird, unsupportable nonsense. They're mostly used to poo-poo any lead Obama DOES have, and usually by people who shake their fist at the sky when he DOESN'T have a lead. Some people can't see good news when it's sitting in front of them. But don't worry. I think the so-called "Bradley effect" is also anachronistic bullshit.
|
TomClash
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
|
I think comparing 1968 to today is "unsupportable nonsense." It wasn't an election about economics, for starters.
The reason the war is less important is that the poor economic health of the country has captured the moment. Still, most people oppose it - McCain would be very lucky if it's a wash.
As Barack says, you can put lipstick on a pig, but it's still a pig. McCain is a pig as a candidate - that's why they selected Palin.
I'm not shaking my fist at anything - I just think by all rights his lead should be bigger than it is. I've been through too many elections to be celebrating small leads in the polls.
|
CoffeeCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-08 01:04 PM
Response to Original message |
7. McCain got a bounce out of MN... |
|
...because his Convention was in that state. Now that the spark has been extinguished--by their own stupidity and nasty campaigning--the McCain numbers come back to reality.
Obama will easily take MN.
|
dflprincess
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-08 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. Don't take Minnesota for granted. |
|
And it pains me to say that.
Last week the Minnesota Poll, which is often thought to lean a bit toward DFLers, had McCain and Obama tied at 45% each and the results of elections here have been affected by third parties (in particular, the last 3 elections for governor, but Nader did take 5% of the vote in 2000).
McCain has been running ads hear constantly, I haven't seen any Obama ads.
|
jrockford
(504 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. Whenever I try to get a sign, they are always out! |
|
Yet, at least where I travel, I don't really see too many Obama signs. That said, I don't see a lot of McCain ones either. I work downtown Minneapolis and live about 20 minutes north. We have one McCain sign in our neighbourhood and it's a private neighbourhood on the lake. 8 years ago, there were Bush signs all over this particular area. Just one McCain sign...
|
melody
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
14. You honestly think we'll lose Minnesota? n/t |
dflprincess
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-08 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
|
I think Minnesota is apt to blue, but it's not impossible that it could go the other way. I am concerned with how much advertising McCain is doing here while Obama is not doing much, if any. It is true that Obama lawn signs are hard to come by, but I did hear from one person who knows more than I, that they think the Obama campaign underestimated how big a deal lawn signs are here and just didn't send enough - though there have been reports that that situation is changing.
It was pretty close that last 2 presidential elections and in a close race third party voters could cause us problems. Pray for good weather in Minnesota on November 4 as good weather tends to favor the DFL turnout.
|
melody
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
16. Looking at all the aspects, I can't see a way we'll lose it |
|
Not that we won't have to work for it ... we have to work for everything. lol
|
jrockford
(504 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-08 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
25. I tried getting one last week |
|
...and they were out at ALL of the offices in MN. But they said they were getting some in on Saturday in St. Paul to be distributed later to the other offices, not sure whether they still have any - I've not had a chance to get to the nearest office. When I was at the State Fair, they were completely out of signs then too.
Still, I think it's nice that you don't see too many McCain signs. I see one very large one on 394W on a fence. And then there's one in my neighbourhood, which like I said before, was littered with "W" signs last election. I just don't think the support is there. The only McCain sign in this area is right next door. He has a NOBama sign as well. His SUV is adorned with flags and Coleman stickers. And he still has mini flags all over the place from 4th of July.
Anyway, can't wait to get my Obama sign.
|
budkin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-08 01:04 PM
Response to Original message |
8. That's what I'm talking about! |
DarthDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-08 01:09 PM
Response to Original message |
|
For ScottyRazz Thumb-On-Scale Effect.
|
grantcart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-08 01:24 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Franken/Coleman tied can you edit your OP to include that too -- tks |
AtomicKitten
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-08 02:17 PM
Response to Original message |
18. To the Greatest Page!!! |
notsoaveragejoe
(15 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-08 02:17 PM
Response to Original message |
yellerpup
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-08 02:56 PM
Response to Original message |
|
And to that I add... :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: K&R! :dem:
|
saltpoint
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-08 08:08 PM
Response to Original message |
27. Good numbers for Obama. |
|
I hope it is a stong blue tide that puts Al Franken in the Senate and swamps Norm Coleman.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:02 AM
Response to Original message |