|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
99th_Monkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-22-08 03:24 PM Original message |
Nat'l Assoc. of Police Organizations ENDORSED OBAMA today! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grannie4peace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-22-08 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
1. that's good --we need them on our side |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
featherman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-22-08 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
2. Always a good counter weight to the NRA which operates as a propoganda arm for the GOP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-22-08 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
3. NAPO supports Assault Weapons Ban, firearms used by 80 million gun-owners. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-22-08 04:09 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. All the more reason to welcome this endorsement. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-22-08 04:11 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. That makes sense if you want to show Obama will ban firearms covered by H.R. 1022. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-22-08 04:01 PM Response to Original message |
4. Very good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-22-08 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
5. This is Fucking HUGE! Why doesn't it have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chulanowa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-22-08 04:25 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. Because there's a bit of cognitive dissonance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-22-08 04:55 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Not all of them..I'm one Democratic voter who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-22-08 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
6. Excellent! k/r/nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knixphan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-22-08 04:09 PM Response to Original message |
7. yeah, baby! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemReadingDU (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-23-08 07:56 AM Response to Original message |
12. Great! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skipos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-23-08 08:03 AM Response to Original message |
13. Who did they endorse in 04 and 00? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:44 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC