Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Good Laugh LTTE on McCain/Palin being candidates of change

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 06:06 AM
Original message
A Good Laugh LTTE on McCain/Palin being candidates of change
A Good Laugh

I heard a really funny joke this week. A lifelong government employee who has been in Congress for nearly 30 years and whose campaign is run by lobbyists is teaming up with a woman who is known as the Queen of Pork-Barrel Earmarks and are trying to sell themselves as the candidates of change. That is hysterical. The only thing John McCain and Sarah Palin will change in Washington is running up the deficit even further while we enrich lobbyists, getting into wars with Russia and Iran and destroying Social Security and Medicare and having the middle class pay for it all. How can John McCain seriously sell himself as a candidate of change? That’s the biggest joke in politics since Howard Stern ran for governor of New York, or since Ross Perot added Admiral Stockdale to his ticket.

http://www.remindernews.com/SpeakOut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. Let's just not hope the joke's on us again
The Republican ticket would be guaranteed a solid 42% even if the ticket
were comprised, AGAIN, of Bush and Cheney. For that matter, they could
count on a solid 42% if their ticket were comprised of Osama bin Laden
and Benedict Arnold. If McFailin' takes office, it will be the sickest
joke of our lifetimes, and one I'd rather not have to tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. If they got 42%, it would be an historic landslide loss
even bigger percentage-wise than Mondale losing to Reagan or McGovern v Nixon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. That's just the percentage that would vote for them blindly
I was guessing, at that. I didn't include the other 10% who will vote for
them because they actually LIKE what they see and hear. It's still an uphill battle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow2u3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. The only thing McLame changed
His tune. This is what he is:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC