LynneSin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-23-08 07:25 AM
Original message |
If electoral college was based on donations lead by state, Obama would win in a landslide |
|
Edited on Tue Sep-23-08 07:26 AM by LynneSin
http://www.newsmeat.com/Check out that top map, I can't imagine how a person, who is out-raising another candidate mainly by small donations is still running a close raise to the other candidate.
|
jakem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-23-08 07:28 AM
Response to Original message |
1. maybe it is how elections should happen... |
|
$25 max per person, the most money raised in 9 months wins.
|
tekisui
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-23-08 07:28 AM
Response to Original message |
2. I simply don't believe the polls are accurate. |
|
I think the trends they show are probably indicative of the movement of Independents/undecideds, but the numbers are falsely skewed 5 points or so towards mcPOW. For various reasons.
|
LynneSin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-23-08 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. polls are going to use 'likely voters' which lean towards the republicans |
|
but you factor in all the new voters registered this election, which is leaning very strongly democrat - there is a large group of voters whose voices are not heard in these polls.
|
SheilaT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-23-08 07:50 AM
Response to Original message |
|
There are only twelve states in which McCain is ahead in fund-raising. And other than in Arizona, his fund-raising lead is nowhere near what it should be, given how very Republican some of those states are supposed to be. Like Kansas, which is one of those considered a lock for him. He's only ahead by some $93,000. Heck, even Arkansas, headquarters of that Evil Empire, Walmart, is only $212,000 to the good for McCain. And they have a LOT of overpaid executives there, most of whom are probably donating in lockstep to McCain's campaign.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:08 PM
Response to Original message |