Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So, this Bail Out is a GOP trick to distance McCain From Bush?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 09:36 PM
Original message
So, this Bail Out is a GOP trick to distance McCain From Bush?
Edited on Tue Sep-23-08 09:38 PM by FrenchieCat
and have the Democrats, including Obama vote for a Bazillion Dollar Bail out that McCain and Republicans won't vote to support? If it is in the GOP platform NOT to support such a Bail Out, and it is the White House and Big Business' fault that it happened, why should Democrats support such a Vote?

So even if the measure fail, will those who voted for it have it used against them during their campaign?

If that is what is happening, have the Democrats figured this out yet?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mth44sc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. This thing
is a way for Bush to blame his recession on the Dems when and if they tell him to take a flying F---ing leap...

If they don't - then they are going to own whatever happens...

At least that is what the repubs are hoping. Trouble is - most folks blame them for the mess to begin with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. So Obama shouldn't be voting on this.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mth44sc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. At best
we oughta be voting for a limited and targeted recovery program - and then see where we are in January.

This wholesale buy up of the banking systems junk is just plain foolish.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seaglass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Voting is not optional on this. It's too important and he will look
spineless if he no shows; there is no legitimate way for him to explain not voting on this to the general public. Too much of a risk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Why not. Sounds like something that was drummed up from Bush CO.,
and pushed by Wall Street and the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seaglass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Because the whole damn country is watching what is going on
and to have the Democratic nominee blow off a vote will look exactly like he is avoiding a tough decision and there is no way to SPIN that to make him look good.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. So McCain is not going to vote on it......
But ok. whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wmbrew0206 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. I thought he played it smart. If the bill is going to pass by a wide margin...
Obama will stay on the campaign trail.

If it is going to be close, he'll be there to vote on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's probably a little more complex than that
McShame cares nothing about doing what's right or even what he believes.
He will take the opposite position, permitted.

He'll claim that Obama doesn't care about the country and will drive us into a Depression for politics, if he says no deal and if he goes for it then McCain will play the conservative angle.

McCain has to be tied down on this or culled from the herd. No money, no surrogates, and a public blackballing and support for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIdaho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. Obama must vote
or it ties into a broader narrative that he never takes a hard stand. If its any consolation NO NONE in congress feels like helping BushCo these days and congressional republicans justifiably feel like they have been thrown to the wolves so I suspect the deal will be "everybody in the boat or the boat stays at the dock."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. If he votes, it has to be against it.......
then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeckind Donating Member (406 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
11. been screaming at the TV all day
I've been screaming at the TV all day on this. How is it that our dems are so smart but they haven't managed to recognize a repub tactic in 30 years?

This issue is a repub issue designed entirely to enflame their base and move the independents. Been looking for an October surprise? Surprise!

Only one option for the dems as I see it-- refuse to play the game. Forget the regulation idea. That word has way too many syllables for the common folk to grasp. And besides the regulators are part of the same thieving group that did this in the first place.

And forget the idea of helping the little guy with his mortgage. They're gone by now and besides, as far as the repubs are concerned, they don't deserve to be rewarded with a free house. Now a greedy thieving banker, that's just the american dream in action.

So as I see it the only possible solution is a delaying action. Argue amounts, argue rules, argue breakups, argue weather ... whatever. Just don't do a vote. It's a lot of money and just throwing good after bad. Kick it down the road and insist on the division of derivatives into individual cases which can ride on their own merits.

The way the thing is structured now the taxpayer picks up the bill for the bad elements of the derivatives and the investment guy gets to keep the good one. Talk about buying pigs in a poke...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Median Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
12. Hey, If McCain Does Not Support The Bush-Paulson Plan, Why Should The Democrats?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
13. In the first place, if Bush and Cheney support it, we know that it is
bad for America. Why would we suddenly decide that Bush is right on this?

Vote NO bailout. Yes to oversight from this point on. That alone would stimulate confidence in the market.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
15. No gov't bailouts is in the GOP platform which contradicts McBush's current faux populist stance.
I heard McBush say that nobody should look to his vote as having any relevance. Riiiiight.

No worries. I think the GOP is talking out of both sides of their mouth and they have been rendered impotent on the economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC